test_bricknil

Complexity

Total Complexity

8

Size/Duplication

Total Lines	49
Duplicated Lines	0 %

Importance

Changes

0

6 Methods

Rating	Name	Duplication	Size	Complexity
A	Testbricknil.test_motor()	0	7	2
A	Testbricknil.setup()	0	2	1
A	Testbricknil.test_name()	0	2	1
A	Testbricknil.test_messages()	0	5	1
A	Testbricknil.test_increment()	0	6	2
A	AsyncMock.__call__()	0	2	1

import pytest
import os, sys
import logging
from asyncio import coroutine

import smtplib
from mock import Mock
from mock import patch, call
from mock import MagicMock
from mock import PropertyMock

sys.modules['bleak'] = MagicMock()
from  bricknil.process import Process
from bricknil.sensor import TrainMotor

class AsyncMock(MagicMock):
    async def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        return super(AsyncMock, self).__call__(*args, **kwargs)


class Testbricknil:

    def setup(self):
        self.p = Process('test')

    def test_name(self):
        assert self.p.name == 'test'

    def test_increment(self):
        for i in range(10):
            p2 = Process('test2')
            assert self.p.id == p2.id-(i+1)
        assert p2.__str__() == 'test2.11'

The variable p2 does not seem to be defined in case the for loop on line 30 is not entered. Are you sure this can never be the case?

        assert p2.__repr__() == 'Process("test2")'

    def test_messages(self):
        self.p.message('hello')
        self.p.message_info('hello')
        self.p.message_debug('hello')
        self.p.message_error('hello')

    @pytest.mark.curio
    #@patch('test_bricknil.TrainMotor.set_output', new_callable=AsyncMock)
    async def test_motor(self):
        m = TrainMotor('motor')
        m.set_output = Mock(side_effect=coroutine(lambda x,y :'the awaitable should return this'))
        await m.set_speed(10)
        assert m.set_output.call_args == call(0, 10)