Completed
Pull Request — master (#6)
by Rafael
09:32
created

SimpleCollection::map()   A

Complexity

Conditions 2
Paths 2

Size

Total Lines 11
Code Lines 6

Duplication

Lines 0
Ratio 0 %

Importance

Changes 1
Bugs 0 Features 0
Metric Value
c 1
b 0
f 0
dl 0
loc 11
rs 9.4286
cc 2
eloc 6
nc 2
nop 1
1
<?php
2
3
namespace Iris\Mapping;
4
5
class SimpleCollection extends Base
6
{
7
    /**
8
     * {@inheritdoc}
9
     */
10
    public function assign(array $externalData)
11
    {
12
        $order = new \Iris\Transfer\Catalog\ConfigCollection();
13
        //$config = [
14
           //'sku'              => $c['sku'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
15
           //'variation'        => $c['variation'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
16
           //'brand'            => $c['brand'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
17
           //'color'            => $c['color'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
18
           //'gender'           => $c['gender'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
19
           //'color_family'     => $c['color_family'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
20
           //'box_height'       => $c['box_height'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
21
           //'box_width'        => $c['box_width'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
22
           //'box_length'       => $c['box_length'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
23
           //'weight'           => $c['weight'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
24
           //'color_name_brand' => $c['color_name_brand'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
25
           //'quantity'         => $c['quantity'],
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
78% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
26
           //'barcode_ean'      => $c['barcode_ean']
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
75% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
27
        //];
28
29
        return $order;
30
    }
31
32
    /**
33
     * {@inheritdoc}
34
     * @param \Iris\Transfer\Catalog\SimpleCollection $internalData
35
     */
36
    public function map($internalData)
37
    {
38
        $externalData = [];
39
        foreach ($internalData as $simple) {
40
            $externalData[] = [
41
                'sku' => $simple->getSku()
42
            ];
43
        }
44
45
        return $externalData;
46
    }
47
}
48