64% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have
checked you do not need it.
The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that
someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.
This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.
$child of type object<tomzx\AbstractParser\NodeInterface> is not a sub-type of object<tomzx\HtmlParser\Node>. It seems like you assume a concrete implementation of the interface tomzx\AbstractParser\NodeInterface to be always present.
This check looks for parameters that are defined as one type in their type
hint or doc comment but seem to be used as a narrower type, i.e an
implementation of an interface or a subclass.
Consider changing the type of the parameter or doing an instanceof check before assuming
your parameter is of the expected type.
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.
The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.
This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.