46% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have
checked you do not need it.
The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that
someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.
This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.
65% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have
checked you do not need it.
The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that
someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.
This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.
It seems like $gc->dbRowOperator can also be of type object<Closure>. However, the property $rowOperator is declared as type object<DbRowDirectOperator>. Maybe add an additional type check?
Our type inference engine has found a suspicous assignment of a value to a property.
This check raises an issue when a value that can be of a mixed type is assigned to
a property that is type hinted more strictly.
For example, imagine you have a variable $accountId that can either hold an
Id object or false (if there is no account id yet). Your code now assigns that
value to the id property of an instance of the Account class. This class
holds a proper account, so the id value must no longer be false.
Either this assignment is in error or a type check should be added for that assignment.
classId{public$id;publicfunction__construct($id){$this->id=$id;}}classAccount{/** @var Id $id */public$id;}$account_id=false;if(starsAreRight()){$account_id=newId(42);}$account=newAccount();if($accountinstanceofId){$account->id=$account_id;}
supernova-ws /
SuperNova
Loading history...
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.
The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.
This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.