Test Failed
Push — master ( 08713d...9fa0b4 )
by Kirill
03:13
created

DirectiveBuilder::buildArguments()   A

Complexity

Conditions 2
Paths 2

Size

Total Lines 9

Duplication

Lines 0
Ratio 0 %

Code Coverage

Tests 0
CRAP Score 6

Importance

Changes 0
Metric Value
cc 2
nc 2
nop 2
dl 0
loc 9
ccs 0
cts 7
cp 0
crap 6
rs 9.9666
c 0
b 0
f 0
1
<?php
2
/**
3
 * This file is part of Railt package.
4
 *
5
 * For the full copyright and license information, please view the LICENSE
6
 * file that was distributed with this source code.
7
 */
8
declare(strict_types=1);
9
10
namespace Railt\SDL\Compiler\Builder\Definition;
11
12
use Railt\Parser\Ast\LeafInterface;
13
use Railt\Parser\Ast\RuleInterface;
14
use Railt\Reflection\Contracts\Definition;
15
use Railt\Reflection\Definition\Dependent\DirectiveLocation;
16
use Railt\Reflection\Definition\DirectiveDefinition;
17
use Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\Definition\DirectiveDefinitionNode;
18
use Railt\SDL\Compiler\Builder\Builder;
19
use Railt\SDL\Exception\TypeConflictException;
20
21
/**
22
 * Class DirectiveBuilder
23
 */
24
class DirectiveBuilder extends Builder
25
{
26
    /**
27
     * @param RuleInterface|DirectiveDefinitionNode $rule
28
     * @param Definition $parent
29
     * @return Definition
30
     * @throws \Railt\Io\Exception\ExternalFileException
31
     */
32
    public function build(RuleInterface $rule, Definition $parent): Definition
33
    {
34
        $directive = new DirectiveDefinition($parent->getDocument(), $rule->getTypeName());
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
It seems like you code against a concrete implementation and not the interface Railt\Parser\Ast\RuleInterface as the method getTypeName() does only exist in the following implementations of said interface: Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...DirectiveDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...tion\EnumDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...ion\InputDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...InterfaceDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...on\ObjectDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...on\ScalarDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...on\SchemaDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...tion\TypeDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...ion\UnionDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\TypeHintNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\TypeNameNode.

Let’s take a look at an example:

interface User
{
    /** @return string */
    public function getPassword();
}

class MyUser implements User
{
    public function getPassword()
    {
        // return something
    }

    public function getDisplayName()
    {
        // return some name.
    }
}

class AuthSystem
{
    public function authenticate(User $user)
    {
        $this->logger->info(sprintf('Authenticating %s.', $user->getDisplayName()));
        // do something.
    }
}

In the above example, the authenticate() method works fine as long as you just pass instances of MyUser. However, if you now also want to pass a different implementation of User which does not have a getDisplayName() method, the code will break.

Available Fixes

  1. Change the type-hint for the parameter:

    class AuthSystem
    {
        public function authenticate(MyUser $user) { /* ... */ }
    }
    
  2. Add an additional type-check:

    class AuthSystem
    {
        public function authenticate(User $user)
        {
            if ($user instanceof MyUser) {
                $this->logger->info(/** ... */);
            }
    
            // or alternatively
            if ( ! $user instanceof MyUser) {
                throw new \LogicException(
                    '$user must be an instance of MyUser, '
                   .'other instances are not supported.'
                );
            }
    
        }
    }
    
Note: PHP Analyzer uses reverse abstract interpretation to narrow down the types inside the if block in such a case.
  1. Add the method to the interface:

    interface User
    {
        /** @return string */
        public function getPassword();
    
        /** @return string */
        public function getDisplayName();
    }
    
Loading history...
Compatibility introduced by
$parent->getDocument() of type object<Railt\Reflection\Contracts\Document> is not a sub-type of object<Railt\Reflection\Document>. It seems like you assume a concrete implementation of the interface Railt\Reflection\Contracts\Document to be always present.

This check looks for parameters that are defined as one type in their type hint or doc comment but seem to be used as a narrower type, i.e an implementation of an interface or a subclass.

Consider changing the type of the parameter or doing an instanceof check before assuming your parameter is of the expected type.

Loading history...
35
        $directive->withOffset($rule->getOffset());
36
        $directive->withDescription($rule->getDescription());
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
It seems like you code against a concrete implementation and not the interface Railt\Parser\Ast\RuleInterface as the method getDescription() does only exist in the following implementations of said interface: Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...DirectiveDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...tion\EnumDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...ion\InputDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...InterfaceDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...on\ObjectDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...on\ScalarDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...on\SchemaDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...tion\TypeDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...ion\UnionDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...\ArgumentDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...EnumValueDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...ent\FieldDefinitionNode, Railt\SDL\Compiler\Ast\D...nputFieldDefinitionNode.

Let’s take a look at an example:

interface User
{
    /** @return string */
    public function getPassword();
}

class MyUser implements User
{
    public function getPassword()
    {
        // return something
    }

    public function getDisplayName()
    {
        // return some name.
    }
}

class AuthSystem
{
    public function authenticate(User $user)
    {
        $this->logger->info(sprintf('Authenticating %s.', $user->getDisplayName()));
        // do something.
    }
}

In the above example, the authenticate() method works fine as long as you just pass instances of MyUser. However, if you now also want to pass a different implementation of User which does not have a getDisplayName() method, the code will break.

Available Fixes

  1. Change the type-hint for the parameter:

    class AuthSystem
    {
        public function authenticate(MyUser $user) { /* ... */ }
    }
    
  2. Add an additional type-check:

    class AuthSystem
    {
        public function authenticate(User $user)
        {
            if ($user instanceof MyUser) {
                $this->logger->info(/** ... */);
            }
    
            // or alternatively
            if ( ! $user instanceof MyUser) {
                throw new \LogicException(
                    '$user must be an instance of MyUser, '
                   .'other instances are not supported.'
                );
            }
    
        }
    }
    
Note: PHP Analyzer uses reverse abstract interpretation to narrow down the types inside the if block in such a case.
  1. Add the method to the interface:

    interface User
    {
        /** @return string */
        public function getPassword();
    
        /** @return string */
        public function getDisplayName();
    }
    
Loading history...
37
38
        $this->buildLocations($directive, $rule);
0 ignored issues
show
Compatibility introduced by
$rule of type object<Railt\Parser\Ast\RuleInterface> is not a sub-type of object<Railt\SDL\Compile...irectiveDefinitionNode>. It seems like you assume a concrete implementation of the interface Railt\Parser\Ast\RuleInterface to be always present.

This check looks for parameters that are defined as one type in their type hint or doc comment but seem to be used as a narrower type, i.e an implementation of an interface or a subclass.

Consider changing the type of the parameter or doing an instanceof check before assuming your parameter is of the expected type.

Loading history...
39
        $this->buildArguments($directive, $rule);
0 ignored issues
show
Compatibility introduced by
$rule of type object<Railt\Parser\Ast\RuleInterface> is not a sub-type of object<Railt\SDL\Compile...irectiveDefinitionNode>. It seems like you assume a concrete implementation of the interface Railt\Parser\Ast\RuleInterface to be always present.

This check looks for parameters that are defined as one type in their type hint or doc comment but seem to be used as a narrower type, i.e an implementation of an interface or a subclass.

Consider changing the type of the parameter or doing an instanceof check before assuming your parameter is of the expected type.

Loading history...
40
41
        return $directive;
42
    }
43
44
    /**
45
     * @param DirectiveDefinition $directive
46
     * @param DirectiveDefinitionNode $rule
47
     * @throws \Railt\Io\Exception\ExternalFileException
48
     */
49
    private function buildArguments(DirectiveDefinition $directive, DirectiveDefinitionNode $rule): void
50
    {
51
        foreach ($rule->getArguments() as $ast) {
52
            /** @var Definition\Dependent\ArgumentDefinition $argument */
53
            $argument = $this->dependent($ast, $directive);
54
55
            $directive->withArgument($argument);
56
        }
57
    }
58
59
    /**
60
     * @param DirectiveDefinition $directive
61
     * @param DirectiveDefinitionNode $rule
62
     * @throws \Railt\Io\Exception\ExternalFileException
63
     */
64
    private function buildLocations(DirectiveDefinition $directive, DirectiveDefinitionNode $rule): void
65
    {
66
        $locations = \array_merge(
67
            DirectiveLocation::EXECUTABLE_LOCATIONS,
68
            DirectiveLocation::SDL_LOCATIONS
69
        );
70
71
        /** @var LeafInterface $ast */
72
        foreach ($rule->getLocations() as $ast => $name) {
73
            $location = new DirectiveLocation($directive, $name);
74
            $location->withOffset($ast->getOffset());
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
The method getOffset cannot be called on $ast (of type integer|string).

Methods can only be called on objects. This check looks for methods being called on variables that have been inferred to never be objects.

Loading history...
75
76
            if (! \in_array($name, $locations, true)) {
77
                $error = \sprintf('Invalid directive location %s, only one of {%s} allowed',
78
                    $location, \implode(', ', $locations));
79
                throw (new TypeConflictException($error))->throwsIn($directive->getFile(), $ast->getOffset());
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
The method getOffset cannot be called on $ast (of type integer|string).

Methods can only be called on objects. This check looks for methods being called on variables that have been inferred to never be objects.

Loading history...
80
            }
81
82
            $directive->withLocation($location);
83
        }
84
    }
85
}
86