Completed
Push — master ( c1a156...8cadde )
by Kirill
08:14
created

EnumDefinitionNode::resolve()   A

Complexity

Conditions 1
Paths 1

Size

Total Lines 4

Duplication

Lines 0
Ratio 0 %

Code Coverage

Tests 2
CRAP Score 1

Importance

Changes 0
Metric Value
cc 1
nc 1
nop 1
dl 0
loc 4
ccs 2
cts 2
cp 1
crap 1
rs 10
c 0
b 0
f 0
1
<?php
2
/**
3
 * This file is part of Railt package.
4
 *
5
 * For the full copyright and license information, please view the LICENSE
6
 * file that was distributed with this source code.
7
 */
8
declare(strict_types=1);
9
10
namespace Railt\SDL\Ast\Definition;
11
12
use Railt\Reflection\Contracts\Definition;
13
use Railt\Reflection\Definition\EnumDefinition;
14
15
/**
16
 * Class EnumDefinitionNode
17
 */
18
class EnumDefinitionNode extends TypeDefinitionNode
19
{
20
    /**
21
     * @param Definition $parent
22
     * @return Definition|EnumDefinition
23
     */
24 15
    public function resolve(Definition $parent): Definition
25
    {
26 15
        return new EnumDefinition($parent->getDocument(), $this->getFullName());
0 ignored issues
show
Compatibility introduced by
$parent->getDocument() of type object<Railt\Reflection\Contracts\Document> is not a sub-type of object<Railt\Reflection\Document>. It seems like you assume a concrete implementation of the interface Railt\Reflection\Contracts\Document to be always present.

This check looks for parameters that are defined as one type in their type hint or doc comment but seem to be used as a narrower type, i.e an implementation of an interface or a subclass.

Consider changing the type of the parameter or doing an instanceof check before assuming your parameter is of the expected type.

Loading history...
27
    }
28
}
29