|
1
|
|
|
package it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.timeline.scheduling; |
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
import java.util.ArrayList; |
|
4
|
|
|
import java.util.Collections; |
|
5
|
|
|
import java.util.List; |
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.domain.component.Decision; |
|
8
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.domain.component.ex.FlawSolutionApplicationException; |
|
9
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.domain.component.ex.RelationPropagationException; |
|
10
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.domain.component.sv.StateVariable; |
|
11
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.ex.ConsistencyCheckException; |
|
12
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.flaw.Flaw; |
|
13
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.flaw.FlawSolution; |
|
14
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.relations.Relation; |
|
15
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.relations.RelationType; |
|
16
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.relations.temporal.BeforeRelation; |
|
17
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.query.TemporalQueryType; |
|
18
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.Resolver; |
|
19
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.ResolverType; |
|
20
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.ex.UnsolvableFlawException; |
|
21
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.time.lang.query.IntervalOverlapQuery; |
|
22
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.utils.properties.FilePropertyReader; |
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
/** |
|
25
|
|
|
* |
|
26
|
|
|
* @author anacleto |
|
27
|
|
|
* |
|
28
|
|
|
*/ |
|
29
|
|
|
public final class TimelineSchedulingResolver extends Resolver<StateVariable> |
|
30
|
|
|
{ |
|
31
|
|
|
private boolean load; |
|
32
|
|
|
private double schedulingCost; |
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
/** |
|
35
|
|
|
* |
|
36
|
|
|
*/ |
|
37
|
|
|
protected TimelineSchedulingResolver() { |
|
38
|
|
|
super(ResolverType.TIMELINE_SCHEDULING_RESOLVER.getLabel(), |
|
39
|
|
|
ResolverType.TIMELINE_SCHEDULING_RESOLVER.getFlawTypes()); |
|
40
|
|
|
// set load flag |
|
41
|
|
|
this.load = false; |
|
42
|
|
|
} |
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
/** |
|
45
|
|
|
* |
|
46
|
|
|
*/ |
|
47
|
|
|
private void load() { |
|
48
|
|
|
// get deliberative property file |
|
49
|
|
|
FilePropertyReader properties = new FilePropertyReader( |
|
50
|
|
|
FRAMEWORK_HOME + FilePropertyReader.DEFAULT_DELIBERATIVE_PROPERTY); |
|
51
|
|
|
// get weight |
|
52
|
|
|
this.schedulingCost = Double.parseDouble(properties.getProperty("scheduling-cost")); |
|
53
|
|
|
// set flag |
|
54
|
|
|
this.load = true; |
|
55
|
|
|
} |
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
/** |
|
58
|
|
|
* |
|
59
|
|
|
*/ |
|
60
|
|
|
@Override |
|
61
|
|
|
protected void doApply(FlawSolution solution) |
|
62
|
|
|
throws FlawSolutionApplicationException |
|
63
|
|
|
{ |
|
64
|
|
|
// get the flaw solution to consider |
|
65
|
|
|
DecisionPrecedenceConstraint pc = (DecisionPrecedenceConstraint) solution; |
|
66
|
|
|
// get reference and target decisions |
|
67
|
|
|
Decision reference = pc.getReference(); |
|
68
|
|
|
Decision target = pc.getTarget(); |
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
// create relation |
|
71
|
|
|
BeforeRelation before = this.component.create(RelationType.BEFORE, reference, target); |
|
72
|
|
|
// set bounds |
|
73
|
|
|
before.setBound(new long[] { |
|
74
|
|
|
0, |
|
75
|
|
|
this.component.getHorizon()}); |
|
76
|
|
|
// add created relation to solution |
|
77
|
|
|
solution.addCreatedRelation(before); |
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
try |
|
80
|
|
|
{ |
|
81
|
|
|
// propagate relations |
|
82
|
|
|
this.component.activate(before); |
|
83
|
|
|
// add activated relations to solution |
|
84
|
|
|
solution.addActivatedRelation(before); |
|
85
|
|
|
debug("Precedence constraint successfully created and activated:\n" |
|
86
|
|
|
+ "- temporal constraint: " + before + "\n"); |
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
// check feasibility |
|
89
|
|
|
this.tdb.verify(); |
|
90
|
|
|
} |
|
91
|
|
|
catch (RelationPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) |
|
92
|
|
|
{ |
|
93
|
|
|
// write error message |
|
94
|
|
|
error("Error while applying flaw solution:\n" |
|
95
|
|
|
+ "- solution: " + solution + "\n" |
|
96
|
|
|
+ "- unfeasible precedence constraint: " + before + "\n"); |
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
// deactivate relation |
|
99
|
|
|
this.component.deactivate(before); |
|
100
|
|
|
// delete relation |
|
101
|
|
|
this.component.delete(before); |
|
102
|
|
|
// not feasible solution |
|
103
|
|
|
throw new FlawSolutionApplicationException(ex.getMessage()); |
|
104
|
|
|
} |
|
105
|
|
|
} |
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
/** |
|
109
|
|
|
* |
|
110
|
|
|
*/ |
|
111
|
|
|
@Override |
|
112
|
|
|
protected List<Flaw> doFindFlaws() |
|
113
|
|
|
{ |
|
114
|
|
|
// check flag |
|
115
|
|
|
if (!this.load) { |
|
116
|
|
|
this.load(); |
|
117
|
|
|
} |
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
// list of critical sets |
|
120
|
|
|
List<Flaw> flaws = new ArrayList<>(); |
|
121
|
|
|
// list of active decisions |
|
122
|
|
|
List<Decision> decisions = this.component.getActiveDecisions(); |
|
123
|
|
|
// sort decisions |
|
124
|
|
|
Collections.sort(decisions); |
|
125
|
|
|
// look for peaks |
|
126
|
|
|
for (int index = 0; index < decisions.size() - 1; index++) |
|
127
|
|
|
{ |
|
128
|
|
|
// get active decision |
|
129
|
|
|
Decision reference = decisions.get(index); |
|
130
|
|
|
// find possibly overlapping decisions |
|
131
|
|
|
for (int jndex = index + 1; jndex < decisions.size(); jndex++) |
|
132
|
|
|
{ |
|
133
|
|
|
// get another active decision |
|
134
|
|
|
Decision target = decisions.get(jndex); |
|
135
|
|
|
// check if intervals can overlap |
|
136
|
|
|
IntervalOverlapQuery query = this.tdb.createTemporalQuery( |
|
137
|
|
|
TemporalQueryType.INTERVAL_OVERLAP); |
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
// set time points |
|
140
|
|
|
query.setReference(reference.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
141
|
|
|
query.setTarget(target.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
142
|
|
|
// process query |
|
143
|
|
|
this.tdb.process(query); |
|
144
|
|
|
// check overlapping |
|
145
|
|
|
if (query.canOverlap()) |
|
146
|
|
|
{ |
|
147
|
|
|
// conflict found |
|
148
|
|
|
BinaryDecisionConflict c = new BinaryDecisionConflict( |
|
149
|
|
|
FLAW_COUNTER.getAndIncrement(), |
|
150
|
|
|
this.component); |
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
// set overlapping decisions |
|
153
|
|
|
c.setDecisions(new Decision[] { |
|
154
|
|
|
reference, |
|
155
|
|
|
target |
|
156
|
|
|
}); |
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
// check if decisions overlaps |
|
159
|
|
|
debug("Overlapping tokens:\n" |
|
160
|
|
|
+ "- component: " + this.component + "\n" |
|
161
|
|
|
+ "- reference token: " + reference + "\n" |
|
162
|
|
|
+ "- target token: " + target + "\n"); |
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
// add conflict |
|
165
|
|
|
flaws.add(c); |
|
166
|
|
|
} |
|
167
|
|
|
} |
|
168
|
|
|
} |
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
// if (!flaws.isEmpty()) { |
|
171
|
|
|
// |
|
172
|
|
|
// // randomly select a scheduling flaw from the component |
|
173
|
|
|
// List<Flaw> conflicts = new ArrayList<>(); |
|
174
|
|
|
// Random rand = new Random(System.currentTimeMillis()); |
|
175
|
|
|
// conflicts.add(flaws.get(rand.nextInt(flaws.size()))); |
|
176
|
|
|
// // get conflicts |
|
177
|
|
|
// return conflicts; |
|
178
|
|
|
// } |
|
179
|
|
|
// else { |
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
// return the list of flaws |
|
182
|
|
|
return flaws; |
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
// } |
|
186
|
|
|
} |
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
/** |
|
191
|
|
|
* |
|
192
|
|
|
*/ |
|
193
|
|
|
protected void doComputeFlawSolutions(Flaw flaw) |
|
194
|
|
|
throws UnsolvableFlawException |
|
195
|
|
|
{ |
|
196
|
|
|
// get detected conflict |
|
197
|
|
|
BinaryDecisionConflict conflict = (BinaryDecisionConflict) flaw; |
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
// check possible precedence constraints |
|
200
|
|
|
Decision reference = conflict.getDecisions()[0]; |
|
201
|
|
|
Decision target = conflict.getDecisions()[1]; |
|
202
|
|
|
// create possible solutions |
|
203
|
|
|
DecisionPrecedenceConstraint pc1 = new DecisionPrecedenceConstraint(conflict, reference, target, this.schedulingCost); |
|
204
|
|
|
DecisionPrecedenceConstraint pc2 = new DecisionPrecedenceConstraint(conflict, target, reference, this.schedulingCost); |
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
View Code Duplication |
try |
|
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
{ |
|
208
|
|
|
// create relation reference -> target |
|
209
|
|
|
BeforeRelation before = this.component.create(RelationType.BEFORE, reference, target); |
|
210
|
|
|
// set bounds |
|
211
|
|
|
before.setBound(new long[] { |
|
212
|
|
|
0, |
|
213
|
|
|
this.component.getHorizon()}); |
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
// add create relation |
|
216
|
|
|
pc1.addCreatedRelation(before); |
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
// activate relation |
|
219
|
|
|
if (this.component.activate(before)) { |
|
220
|
|
|
// add activated relations |
|
221
|
|
|
pc1.addActivatedRelation(before); |
|
222
|
|
|
} |
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
// check consistency |
|
225
|
|
|
this.tdb.verify(); |
|
226
|
|
|
// add solution and deactivate relation |
|
227
|
|
|
conflict.addSolution(pc1); |
|
228
|
|
|
} |
|
229
|
|
|
catch (RelationPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) { |
|
230
|
|
|
// discard relation |
|
231
|
|
|
debug("Unfeasible precedence constraint:\n" |
|
232
|
|
|
+ "\t- reference: " + reference + "\n" |
|
233
|
|
|
+ "\t- target: " + target + "\n"); |
|
234
|
|
|
} |
|
235
|
|
|
finally { |
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
// deactivate relation |
|
238
|
|
|
for (Relation rel : pc1.getActivatedRelations()) { |
|
239
|
|
|
// deactivate relation |
|
240
|
|
|
this.component.deactivate(rel); |
|
241
|
|
|
} |
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
for (Relation rel : pc1.getCreatedRelations()) { |
|
244
|
|
|
// delete relation |
|
245
|
|
|
this.component.delete(rel); |
|
246
|
|
|
} |
|
247
|
|
|
} |
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
View Code Duplication |
try |
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
{ |
|
252
|
|
|
// create relation reference -> target |
|
253
|
|
|
BeforeRelation before = this.component.create(RelationType.BEFORE, target, reference); |
|
254
|
|
|
// set bounds |
|
255
|
|
|
before.setBound(new long[] { |
|
256
|
|
|
0, |
|
257
|
|
|
this.component.getHorizon()}); |
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
// add created relation |
|
260
|
|
|
pc2.addCreatedRelation(before); |
|
261
|
|
|
// check if relation is feasible |
|
262
|
|
|
if (this.component.activate(before)) { |
|
263
|
|
|
// add activated relation |
|
264
|
|
|
pc2.addActivatedRelation(before); |
|
265
|
|
|
} |
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
// check consistency |
|
268
|
|
|
this.tdb.verify(); |
|
269
|
|
|
// add solution and deactivate relation |
|
270
|
|
|
conflict.addSolution(pc2); |
|
271
|
|
|
} |
|
272
|
|
|
catch (RelationPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) { |
|
273
|
|
|
// discard relation |
|
274
|
|
|
debug("Unfeasible precedence constraint:\n" |
|
275
|
|
|
+ "\t- reference: " + target + "\n" |
|
276
|
|
|
+ "\t- target: " + reference + "\n"); |
|
277
|
|
|
} |
|
278
|
|
|
finally { |
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
// deactivate relation |
|
281
|
|
|
for (Relation rel : pc2.getActivatedRelations()) { |
|
282
|
|
|
// deactivate relation |
|
283
|
|
|
this.component.deactivate(rel); |
|
284
|
|
|
} |
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
for (Relation rel : pc2.getCreatedRelations()) { |
|
287
|
|
|
// delete relation |
|
288
|
|
|
this.component.delete(rel); |
|
289
|
|
|
} |
|
290
|
|
|
} |
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
// check if any solution has been found |
|
294
|
|
|
if (conflict.getSolutions().isEmpty()) { |
|
295
|
|
|
throw new UnsolvableFlawException("Unsolvable decision conflict on timeline:\n" |
|
296
|
|
|
+ "\t- component: " + this.component.getName() + "\n" |
|
297
|
|
|
+ "\t- decisions: " + conflict.getDecisions()[0] + ", " + conflict.getDecisions()[1] + "\n"); |
|
298
|
|
|
} |
|
299
|
|
|
} |
|
300
|
|
|
} |
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|