| Total Complexity | 57 |
| Total Lines | 575 |
| Duplicated Lines | 18.43 % |
| Changes | 0 | ||
Duplicate code is one of the most pungent code smells. A rule that is often used is to re-structure code once it is duplicated in three or more places.
Common duplication problems, and corresponding solutions are:
Complex classes like it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.timeline.behavior.planning.TimelineBehaviorPlanningResolver often do a lot of different things. To break such a class down, we need to identify a cohesive component within that class. A common approach to find such a component is to look for fields/methods that share the same prefixes, or suffixes.
Once you have determined the fields that belong together, you can apply the Extract Class refactoring. If the component makes sense as a sub-class, Extract Subclass is also a candidate, and is often faster.
| 1 | package it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.timeline.behavior.planning; |
||
| 40 | public final class TimelineBehaviorPlanningResolver extends Resolver<StateVariable> |
||
| 41 | { |
||
| 42 | private boolean load; |
||
| 43 | private double cost; |
||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | /** |
||
| 46 | * |
||
| 47 | */ |
||
| 48 | protected TimelineBehaviorPlanningResolver() { |
||
| 49 | super(ResolverType.TIMELINE_BEHAVIOR_PLANNING_RESOLVER.getLabel(), |
||
| 50 | ResolverType.TIMELINE_BEHAVIOR_PLANNING_RESOLVER.getFlawTypes()); |
||
| 51 | // set load flag |
||
| 52 | this.load = false; |
||
| 53 | } |
||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | /** |
||
| 56 | * |
||
| 57 | */ |
||
| 58 | private void load() { |
||
| 59 | // get deliberative property file |
||
| 60 | FilePropertyReader properties = new FilePropertyReader( |
||
| 61 | FRAMEWORK_HOME + FilePropertyReader.DEFAULT_DELIBERATIVE_PROPERTY); |
||
| 62 | // get weight |
||
| 63 | this.cost = Double.parseDouble(properties.getProperty("completion-cost")); |
||
| 64 | // set flag |
||
| 65 | this.load = true; |
||
| 66 | } |
||
| 67 | |||
| 68 | /** |
||
| 69 | * |
||
| 70 | */ |
||
| 71 | @Override |
||
| 72 | protected void doApply(FlawSolution solution) |
||
| 73 | throws FlawSolutionApplicationException |
||
| 74 | { |
||
| 75 | // get the flaw solution to apply |
||
| 76 | GapCompletion completion = (GapCompletion) solution; |
||
| 77 | // check solution path |
||
| 78 | if (completion.getPath().isEmpty()) |
||
| 79 | { |
||
| 80 | try |
||
| 81 | { |
||
| 82 | // direct token transition between active decisions |
||
| 83 | Decision reference = completion.getLeftDecision(); |
||
| 84 | Decision target = completion.getRightDecision(); |
||
| 85 | |||
| 86 | // create meets constraint to enforce the desired transition |
||
| 87 | MeetsRelation meets = this.component.create(RelationType.MEETS, reference, target); |
||
| 88 | // add created relation |
||
| 89 | solution.addCreatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 90 | // propagate relation |
||
| 91 | if (this.component.activate(meets)) { |
||
| 92 | // add activated relation to solution |
||
| 93 | solution.addActivatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 94 | } |
||
| 95 | |||
| 96 | // create parameter relations |
||
| 97 | Set<Relation> pRels = this.createParameterRelations(reference, target); |
||
| 98 | // add created relation |
||
| 99 | solution.addCreatedRelations(pRels); |
||
| 100 | // propagate relation |
||
| 101 | for (Relation pRel : pRels) { |
||
| 102 | // activate relation if possible |
||
| 103 | if (this.component.activate(pRel)) { |
||
| 104 | // add activated relation to solution |
||
| 105 | solution.addActivatedRelation(pRel); |
||
| 106 | } |
||
| 107 | } |
||
| 108 | |||
| 109 | // check feasibility |
||
| 110 | this.tdb.verify(); |
||
| 111 | this.pdb.verify(); |
||
| 112 | } |
||
| 113 | catch (TransitionNotFoundException | RelationPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) |
||
| 114 | { |
||
| 115 | // deactivate activated relations |
||
| 116 | for (Relation rel : solution.getActivatedRelations()) { |
||
| 117 | // get reference component |
||
| 118 | DomainComponent refComp = rel.getReference().getComponent(); |
||
| 119 | refComp.deactivate(rel); |
||
| 120 | } |
||
| 121 | |||
| 122 | // delete created relations |
||
| 123 | for (Relation rel : solution.getCreatedRelations()) { |
||
| 124 | // get reference component |
||
| 125 | DomainComponent refComp = rel.getReference().getComponent(); |
||
| 126 | // delete relation |
||
| 127 | refComp.delete(rel); |
||
| 128 | } |
||
| 129 | |||
| 130 | // not feasible solution |
||
| 131 | throw new FlawSolutionApplicationException(ex.getMessage()); |
||
| 132 | } |
||
| 133 | } |
||
| 134 | else |
||
| 135 | { |
||
| 136 | // create the list of the decisions |
||
| 137 | List<Decision> transition = new ArrayList<>(); |
||
| 138 | // add the gap-left decision |
||
| 139 | transition.add(completion.getLeftDecision()); |
||
| 140 | try { |
||
| 141 | |||
| 142 | // intermediate values and related relations can be activated since no synchronization is entailed |
||
| 143 | View Code Duplication | for (ComponentValue value : completion.getPath()) |
|
|
|
|||
| 144 | { |
||
| 145 | // create parameters' labels |
||
| 146 | String[] labels = new String[value.getNumberOfParameterPlaceHolders()]; |
||
| 147 | for (int index = 0; index < labels.length; index++) { |
||
| 148 | // set parameter label |
||
| 149 | labels[index] = "label-" + index; |
||
| 150 | } |
||
| 151 | |||
| 152 | // create pending decision |
||
| 153 | Decision dec = this.component.create(value, labels); |
||
| 154 | // these decisions can be set as mandatory expansion |
||
| 155 | dec.setMandatoryExpansion(); |
||
| 156 | // add created decision to transition |
||
| 157 | transition.add(dec); |
||
| 158 | // add pending decision |
||
| 159 | solution.addCreatedDecision(dec); |
||
| 160 | |||
| 161 | // activate the decision if possible |
||
| 162 | if (!value.isComplex()) { |
||
| 163 | |||
| 164 | // activated decision |
||
| 165 | Set<Relation> list = this.component.activate(dec); |
||
| 166 | // add activated decisions |
||
| 167 | solution.addActivatedDecision(dec); |
||
| 168 | // add activated relations |
||
| 169 | solution.addActivatedRelations(list); |
||
| 170 | } |
||
| 171 | } |
||
| 172 | |||
| 173 | // add the gap-right decision |
||
| 174 | transition.add(completion.getRightDecision()); |
||
| 175 | |||
| 176 | // create relations needed to enforce the transition |
||
| 177 | View Code Duplication | for (int index = 0; index < transition.size() - 1; index++) |
|
| 178 | { |
||
| 179 | // get adjacent decisions |
||
| 180 | Decision reference = transition.get(index); |
||
| 181 | Decision target = transition.get(index + 1); |
||
| 182 | |||
| 183 | // create pending relation |
||
| 184 | MeetsRelation meets = this.component.create(RelationType.MEETS, reference, target); |
||
| 185 | // add created relation |
||
| 186 | solution.addCreatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 187 | // activate relation if possible |
||
| 188 | if (this.component.activate(meets)) { |
||
| 189 | // add to activated relations |
||
| 190 | solution.addActivatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 191 | } |
||
| 192 | |||
| 193 | // create parameter relations |
||
| 194 | Set<Relation> pRels = this.createParameterRelations(reference, target); |
||
| 195 | // check relations |
||
| 196 | for (Relation prel : pRels) { |
||
| 197 | // add relation to solution |
||
| 198 | solution.addCreatedRelation(prel); |
||
| 199 | // activate relation if possible |
||
| 200 | if (this.component.activate(prel)) { |
||
| 201 | // add to activated relations |
||
| 202 | solution.addActivatedRelation(prel); |
||
| 203 | } |
||
| 204 | } |
||
| 205 | } |
||
| 206 | |||
| 207 | // check consistency |
||
| 208 | this.tdb.verify(); |
||
| 209 | this.pdb.verify(); |
||
| 210 | } |
||
| 211 | catch (Exception ex) { |
||
| 212 | |||
| 213 | // deactivate relations |
||
| 214 | for (Relation rel : solution.getActivatedRelations()) { |
||
| 215 | this.component.deactivate(rel); |
||
| 216 | } |
||
| 217 | |||
| 218 | // delete created relations |
||
| 219 | for (Relation rel : solution.getCreatedRelations()) { |
||
| 220 | this.component.delete(rel); |
||
| 221 | } |
||
| 222 | |||
| 223 | // deactivate decisions |
||
| 224 | for (Decision dec : solution.getActivatedDecisions()) { |
||
| 225 | this.component.deactivate(dec); |
||
| 226 | } |
||
| 227 | |||
| 228 | // free created decisions |
||
| 229 | for (Decision dec : solution.getCreatedDecisions()) { |
||
| 230 | this.component.free(dec); |
||
| 231 | } |
||
| 232 | |||
| 233 | // throw exception |
||
| 234 | throw new FlawSolutionApplicationException("Error while applying flaw solution:\n" |
||
| 235 | + "- behavior-completion: " + completion + "\n" |
||
| 236 | + "- message: " + ex.getMessage() + "\n"); |
||
| 237 | } |
||
| 238 | } |
||
| 239 | } |
||
| 240 | |||
| 241 | /** |
||
| 242 | * |
||
| 243 | * @return |
||
| 244 | */ |
||
| 245 | @Override |
||
| 246 | protected List<Flaw> doFindFlaws() |
||
| 247 | { |
||
| 248 | // load flat |
||
| 249 | if (!this.load) { |
||
| 250 | this.load(); |
||
| 251 | } |
||
| 252 | |||
| 253 | // list of gaps |
||
| 254 | List<Flaw> flaws = new ArrayList<>(); |
||
| 255 | // get the "ordered" list of tokens on the component |
||
| 256 | List<Decision> list = this.component.getActiveDecisions(); |
||
| 257 | |||
| 258 | // check gaps between adjacent decisions |
||
| 259 | for (int index = 0; index < list.size() - 1; index++) |
||
| 260 | { |
||
| 261 | // get two adjacent decisions |
||
| 262 | Decision left = list.get(index); |
||
| 263 | Decision right = list.get(index + 1); |
||
| 264 | |||
| 265 | // check if scheduled |
||
| 266 | IntervalOverlapQuery query = this.tdb.createTemporalQuery( |
||
| 267 | TemporalQueryType.INTERVAL_OVERLAP); |
||
| 268 | // set time points |
||
| 269 | query.setReference(left.getToken().getInterval()); |
||
| 270 | query.setTarget(right.getToken().getInterval()); |
||
| 271 | |||
| 272 | // process query |
||
| 273 | this.tdb.process(query); |
||
| 274 | // check if they intervals can overlap |
||
| 275 | if (query.canOverlap()) |
||
| 276 | { |
||
| 277 | // precondition not satisfied |
||
| 278 | debug("No timeline behavior flaw can be detected as tokens are not scheduled:\n" |
||
| 279 | + "- component: " + this.component + "\n" |
||
| 280 | + "- [reason] Behaviors cannot be plant due to potentially overlapping tokens:\n" |
||
| 281 | + "\t- reference: " + left + "\n" |
||
| 282 | + "\t- target: " + right + "\n"); |
||
| 283 | |||
| 284 | // clear data structures and stop inspecting this component for this type of flaws |
||
| 285 | flaws = new ArrayList<>(); |
||
| 286 | break; |
||
| 287 | } |
||
| 288 | else |
||
| 289 | { |
||
| 290 | // check if scheduled |
||
| 291 | IntervalDistanceQuery distance = this.tdb.createTemporalQuery( |
||
| 292 | TemporalQueryType.INTERVAL_DISTANCE); |
||
| 293 | // set time points |
||
| 294 | distance.setReference(left.getToken().getInterval()); |
||
| 295 | distance.setTarget(right.getToken().getInterval()); |
||
| 296 | // process query |
||
| 297 | this.tdb.process(distance); |
||
| 298 | |||
| 299 | // check the distance between the two decisions |
||
| 300 | if (distance.getDistanceLowerBound() >= 0 && distance.getDistanceUpperBound() > 0) |
||
| 301 | { |
||
| 302 | // a gap has been found on the timeline |
||
| 303 | Gap gap = new Gap(FLAW_COUNTER.getAndIncrement(), |
||
| 304 | this.component, |
||
| 305 | left, |
||
| 306 | right, |
||
| 307 | new long[] { |
||
| 308 | distance.getDistanceLowerBound(), |
||
| 309 | distance.getDistanceUpperBound()}); |
||
| 310 | |||
| 311 | // add gap |
||
| 312 | flaws.add(gap); |
||
| 313 | debug("Gap found on component: " |
||
| 314 | + "- component: " + this.component + "\n" |
||
| 315 | + "- reference: " + left + "\n" |
||
| 316 | + "- target: " + right + "\n" |
||
| 317 | + "- distance: [" + distance.getDistanceLowerBound() + ", " + distance.getDistanceUpperBound() + "]\n"); |
||
| 318 | } |
||
| 319 | } |
||
| 320 | } |
||
| 321 | |||
| 322 | |||
| 323 | // get flaws |
||
| 324 | return flaws; |
||
| 325 | } |
||
| 326 | |||
| 327 | /** |
||
| 328 | * |
||
| 329 | */ |
||
| 330 | @Override |
||
| 331 | protected void doComputeFlawSolutions(Flaw flaw) |
||
| 332 | throws UnsolvableFlawException |
||
| 333 | { |
||
| 334 | // get the gap |
||
| 335 | Gap gap = (Gap) flaw; |
||
| 336 | // check gap type |
||
| 337 | switch (gap.getGapType()) |
||
| 338 | { |
||
| 339 | // incomplete time-line |
||
| 340 | case INCOMPLETE_TIMELINE : |
||
| 341 | { |
||
| 342 | // check all (acyclic) paths among tokens |
||
| 343 | List<ValuePath> paths = this.component.getPaths( |
||
| 344 | gap.getLeftDecision().getValue(), |
||
| 345 | gap.getRightDecision().getValue()); |
||
| 346 | |||
| 347 | // check found solutions |
||
| 348 | if (paths.isEmpty()) { |
||
| 349 | // not gap completion found between the two tokens |
||
| 350 | throw new UnsolvableFlawException("Not gap completion found:\n" |
||
| 351 | + "- gap: " + gap + "\n"); |
||
| 352 | } |
||
| 353 | else |
||
| 354 | { |
||
| 355 | // compute a solution for each possible value path |
||
| 356 | for (ValuePath path : paths) |
||
| 357 | { |
||
| 358 | // get steps |
||
| 359 | List<ComponentValue> steps = path.getSteps(); |
||
| 360 | // remove the source and destination values from the path |
||
| 361 | steps.remove(0); |
||
| 362 | steps.remove(steps.size() - 1); |
||
| 363 | // gap solution |
||
| 364 | GapCompletion solution = new GapCompletion(gap, steps, this.cost); |
||
| 365 | |||
| 366 | try |
||
| 367 | { |
||
| 368 | // check solution feasibility |
||
| 369 | if (solution.getPath().isEmpty()) |
||
| 370 | { |
||
| 371 | // direct token transition between active decisions |
||
| 372 | Decision reference = solution.getLeftDecision(); |
||
| 373 | Decision target = solution.getRightDecision(); |
||
| 374 | |||
| 375 | // create meets constraint to enforce the desired transition |
||
| 376 | MeetsRelation meets = this.component.create(RelationType.MEETS, reference, target); |
||
| 377 | // add created relation |
||
| 378 | solution.addCreatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 379 | // propagate relation and activate it if possible |
||
| 380 | if (this.component.activate(meets)) { |
||
| 381 | // add activated relation to solution |
||
| 382 | solution.addActivatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 383 | } |
||
| 384 | |||
| 385 | // create parameter relations |
||
| 386 | Set<Relation> pRels = this.createParameterRelations(reference, target); |
||
| 387 | // add created relation |
||
| 388 | solution.addCreatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 389 | // propagate relation |
||
| 390 | for (Relation pRel : pRels) { |
||
| 391 | // activate relation if possible |
||
| 392 | if (this.component.activate(pRel)) { |
||
| 393 | // add activated relation to solution |
||
| 394 | solution.addActivatedRelation(pRel); |
||
| 395 | } |
||
| 396 | } |
||
| 397 | } |
||
| 398 | else |
||
| 399 | { |
||
| 400 | // create the list of the decisions |
||
| 401 | List<Decision> transition = new ArrayList<>(); |
||
| 402 | // add the gap-left decision |
||
| 403 | transition.add(solution.getLeftDecision()); |
||
| 404 | |||
| 405 | // intermediate values and related relations can be activated since no synchronization is entailed |
||
| 406 | View Code Duplication | for (ComponentValue value : solution.getPath()) |
|
| 407 | { |
||
| 408 | // create parameters' labels |
||
| 409 | String[] labels = new String[value.getNumberOfParameterPlaceHolders()]; |
||
| 410 | for (int index = 0; index < labels.length; index++) { |
||
| 411 | // set parameter label |
||
| 412 | labels[index] = "label-" + index; |
||
| 413 | } |
||
| 414 | |||
| 415 | // create pending decision |
||
| 416 | Decision dec = this.component.create(value, labels); |
||
| 417 | // these decisions can be set as mandatory expansion |
||
| 418 | dec.setMandatoryExpansion(); |
||
| 419 | // add created decision to transition |
||
| 420 | transition.add(dec); |
||
| 421 | // add pending decision |
||
| 422 | solution.addCreatedDecision(dec); |
||
| 423 | |||
| 424 | // activate the decision if possible |
||
| 425 | if (!value.isComplex()) { |
||
| 426 | |||
| 427 | // activated decision |
||
| 428 | Set<Relation> list = this.component.activate(dec); |
||
| 429 | // add activated decisions |
||
| 430 | solution.addActivatedDecision(dec); |
||
| 431 | // add activated relations |
||
| 432 | solution.addActivatedRelations(list); |
||
| 433 | } |
||
| 434 | } |
||
| 435 | |||
| 436 | // add the gap-right decision |
||
| 437 | transition.add(solution.getRightDecision()); |
||
| 438 | |||
| 439 | // create relations needed to enforce the transition |
||
| 440 | View Code Duplication | for (int index = 0; index < transition.size() - 1; index++) |
|
| 441 | { |
||
| 442 | // get adjacent decisions |
||
| 443 | Decision reference = transition.get(index); |
||
| 444 | Decision target = transition.get(index + 1); |
||
| 445 | |||
| 446 | // create pending relation |
||
| 447 | MeetsRelation meets = this.component.create(RelationType.MEETS, reference, target); |
||
| 448 | // add created relation |
||
| 449 | solution.addCreatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 450 | // activate relation if possible |
||
| 451 | if (this.component.activate(meets)) { |
||
| 452 | // add to activated relations |
||
| 453 | solution.addActivatedRelation(meets); |
||
| 454 | } |
||
| 455 | |||
| 456 | // create parameter relations |
||
| 457 | Set<Relation> pRels = this.createParameterRelations(reference, target); |
||
| 458 | // check relations |
||
| 459 | for (Relation prel : pRels) { |
||
| 460 | // add relation to solution |
||
| 461 | solution.addCreatedRelation(prel); |
||
| 462 | // activate relation if possible |
||
| 463 | if (this.component.activate(prel)) { |
||
| 464 | // add to activated relations |
||
| 465 | solution.addActivatedRelation(prel); |
||
| 466 | } |
||
| 467 | } |
||
| 468 | } |
||
| 469 | } |
||
| 470 | |||
| 471 | // check feasibility |
||
| 472 | this.tdb.verify(); |
||
| 473 | this.pdb.verify(); |
||
| 474 | |||
| 475 | // add solution to the flaw since everything is feasible |
||
| 476 | gap.addSolution(solution); |
||
| 477 | // print gap information |
||
| 478 | debug("Gap found on component " + this.component.getName() + ":\n" |
||
| 479 | + "- gap distance: [dmin= " + gap.getDmin() + ", dmax= " + gap.getDmax() + "] \n" |
||
| 480 | + "- left-side decision: " + gap.getLeftDecision() + "\n" |
||
| 481 | + "- right-side decision: " + gap.getRightDecision() + "\n" |
||
| 482 | + "- solution path: " + path + "\n"); |
||
| 483 | } |
||
| 484 | catch (RelationPropagationException | TransitionNotFoundException | DecisionPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) { |
||
| 485 | // discard this path as not temporally feasible |
||
| 486 | warning("Unfeasible transition path for timelime behavior completion:\n" |
||
| 487 | + "- gap distance: [dmin= " + gap.getDmin() +", " + gap.getDmax() + "]\n" |
||
| 488 | + "- path: " + path + "\n"); |
||
| 489 | // + "- path duration: [dmin= " + tranMinDuration + ", " + tranMaxDuration + "]"); |
||
| 490 | } |
||
| 491 | finally { |
||
| 492 | |||
| 493 | // deactivate relations |
||
| 494 | for (Relation rel : solution.getActivatedRelations()) { |
||
| 495 | this.component.deactivate(rel); |
||
| 496 | } |
||
| 497 | |||
| 498 | // delete relation |
||
| 499 | for (Relation rel : solution.getCreatedRelations()) { |
||
| 500 | this.component.delete(rel); |
||
| 501 | } |
||
| 502 | |||
| 503 | // deactivate decision |
||
| 504 | for (Decision dec : solution.getActivatedDecisions()) { |
||
| 505 | this.component.deactivate(dec); |
||
| 506 | } |
||
| 507 | |||
| 508 | // free decision |
||
| 509 | for (Decision dec : solution.getCreatedDecisions()) { |
||
| 510 | this.component.free(dec); |
||
| 511 | } |
||
| 512 | } |
||
| 513 | } |
||
| 514 | } |
||
| 515 | } |
||
| 516 | break; |
||
| 517 | |||
| 518 | // semantic connection missing |
||
| 519 | case SEMANTIC_CONNECTION : { |
||
| 520 | |||
| 521 | // direct connection between decisions |
||
| 522 | GapCompletion solution = new GapCompletion(gap, new ArrayList<ComponentValue>(), this.cost); |
||
| 523 | // add gap solution |
||
| 524 | gap.addSolution(solution); |
||
| 525 | } |
||
| 526 | break; |
||
| 527 | } |
||
| 528 | |||
| 529 | // check if solvable |
||
| 530 | if (!gap.isSolvable()) { |
||
| 531 | throw new UnsolvableFlawException("Unsolvable gap found on component " + this.component.getName() + ":" |
||
| 532 | + "\n- gap: " + flaw + "\n"); |
||
| 533 | } |
||
| 534 | } |
||
| 535 | |||
| 536 | /** |
||
| 537 | * |
||
| 538 | * @param reference |
||
| 539 | * @param target |
||
| 540 | * @return |
||
| 541 | * @throws TransitionNotFoundException |
||
| 542 | */ |
||
| 543 | private Set<Relation> createParameterRelations(Decision reference, Decision target) |
||
| 544 | throws TransitionNotFoundException |
||
| 545 | { |
||
| 546 | // relations |
||
| 547 | Set<Relation> rels = new HashSet<>(); |
||
| 548 | // get transition between values |
||
| 549 | Transition t = this.component.getTransition(reference.getValue(), target.getValue()); |
||
| 550 | |||
| 551 | // reference parameter position index |
||
| 552 | int referenceParameterIndex = 0; |
||
| 553 | while (referenceParameterIndex < reference.getParameterLabels().length) { |
||
| 554 | |||
| 555 | // target parameter position index |
||
| 556 | int targetParameterIndex = 0; |
||
| 557 | while (targetParameterIndex < target.getParameterLabels().length) { |
||
| 558 | |||
| 559 | // check if a parameter constraint exists |
||
| 560 | if (t.existsParameterConstraint(referenceParameterIndex, targetParameterIndex)) { |
||
| 561 | // get parameter constraint type |
||
| 562 | ParameterConstraintType pConsType = t.getParameterConstraintType(referenceParameterIndex, targetParameterIndex); |
||
| 563 | |||
| 564 | // add (local) pending parameter constraint |
||
| 565 | switch (pConsType) { |
||
| 566 | |||
| 567 | // equal parameter constraint |
||
| 568 | case EQUAL : { |
||
| 569 | |||
| 570 | // create (pending) local relation |
||
| 571 | EqualParameterRelation equal = (EqualParameterRelation) this.component.create(RelationType.EQUAL_PARAMETER, reference, target); |
||
| 572 | // set reference parameter label |
||
| 573 | equal.setReferenceParameterLabel(reference.getParameterLabelByIndex(referenceParameterIndex)); |
||
| 574 | // set target parameter label |
||
| 575 | equal.setTargetParameterLabel(target.getParameterLabelByIndex(targetParameterIndex)); |
||
| 576 | // add create relation to solution |
||
| 577 | rels.add(equal); |
||
| 578 | } |
||
| 579 | break; |
||
| 580 | |||
| 581 | // not equal parameter |
||
| 582 | case NOT_EQUAL : { |
||
| 583 | |||
| 584 | // create (pending) local relation |
||
| 585 | NotEqualParameterRelation notEqual = (NotEqualParameterRelation) this.component.create(RelationType.NOT_EQUAL_PARAMETER, reference, target); |
||
| 586 | // set reference parameter label |
||
| 587 | notEqual.setReferenceParameterLabel(reference.getParameterLabelByIndex(referenceParameterIndex)); |
||
| 588 | notEqual.setTargetParameterLabel(target.getParameterLabelByIndex(targetParameterIndex)); |
||
| 589 | // add create relation to solution |
||
| 590 | rels.add(notEqual); |
||
| 591 | } |
||
| 592 | break; |
||
| 593 | |||
| 594 | default : { |
||
| 595 | |||
| 596 | /* |
||
| 597 | * TODO: <<<<----- VERIFICARE SE VANNO GESTITI ALTRI TIPI DI VINCOLI |
||
| 598 | */ |
||
| 599 | |||
| 600 | throw new RuntimeException("Unknown parameter constraint type in state variable transition " + pConsType); |
||
| 601 | } |
||
| 602 | } |
||
| 603 | } |
||
| 604 | |||
| 605 | // next target parameter index |
||
| 606 | targetParameterIndex++; |
||
| 607 | } |
||
| 608 | |||
| 609 | // next index |
||
| 610 | referenceParameterIndex++; |
||
| 611 | } |
||
| 612 | |||
| 613 | // get created relations |
||
| 614 | return rels; |
||
| 615 | } |
||
| 617 |