| Conditions | 10 |
| Total Lines | 96 |
| Code Lines | 39 |
| Lines | 0 |
| Ratio | 0 % |
| Changes | 0 | ||
Small methods make your code easier to understand, in particular if combined with a good name. Besides, if your method is small, finding a good name is usually much easier.
For example, if you find yourself adding comments to a method's body, this is usually a good sign to extract the commented part to a new method, and use the comment as a starting point when coming up with a good name for this new method.
Commonly applied refactorings include:
If many parameters/temporary variables are present:
Complex classes like it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.Resolver.doRestore(FlawSolution) often do a lot of different things. To break such a class down, we need to identify a cohesive component within that class. A common approach to find such a component is to look for fields/methods that share the same prefixes, or suffixes.
Once you have determined the fields that belong together, you can apply the Extract Class refactoring. If the component makes sense as a sub-class, Extract Subclass is also a candidate, and is often faster.
| 1 | package it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver; |
||
| 241 | protected void doRestore(FlawSolution solution) |
||
| 242 | throws RelationPropagationException, DecisionPropagationException { |
||
| 243 | |||
| 244 | // list of restored decisions |
||
| 245 | Set<Decision> dRestored = new HashSet<>(); |
||
| 246 | // list of activated decisions |
||
| 247 | Set<Decision> dActivated = new HashSet<>(); |
||
| 248 | // list of restored relations |
||
| 249 | Set<Relation> rRestored = new HashSet<>(); |
||
| 250 | // list of activated relations |
||
| 251 | Set<Relation> rActivated = new HashSet<>(); |
||
| 252 | |||
| 253 | try { |
||
| 254 | |||
| 255 | // get the list of created decisions |
||
| 256 | for (Decision decision : solution.getCreatedDecisions()) { |
||
| 257 | // get decision component |
||
| 258 | DomainComponent dComp = decision.getComponent(); |
||
| 259 | // restore decision SILENT -> PENDING |
||
| 260 | dComp.restore(decision); |
||
| 261 | // add |
||
| 262 | dRestored.add(decision); |
||
| 263 | } |
||
| 264 | |||
| 265 | |||
| 266 | // check activated decisions |
||
| 267 | for (Decision decision : solution.getActivatedDecisions()) { |
||
| 268 | // get decision component |
||
| 269 | DomainComponent dComp = decision.getComponent(); |
||
| 270 | // activate decision PENDING -> ACTIVE |
||
| 271 | dComp.activate(decision); |
||
| 272 | // add |
||
| 273 | dActivated.add(decision); |
||
| 274 | } |
||
| 275 | |||
| 276 | // get the list of created relations |
||
| 277 | for (Relation relation : solution.getCreatedRelations()) { |
||
| 278 | // get reference component |
||
| 279 | DomainComponent refComp = relation.getReference().getComponent(); |
||
| 280 | // restore relation |
||
| 281 | refComp.restore(relation); |
||
| 282 | // add |
||
| 283 | rRestored.add(relation); |
||
| 284 | } |
||
| 285 | |||
| 286 | // check activated relations |
||
| 287 | for (Relation relation : solution.getActivatedRelations()) { |
||
| 288 | // get reference component |
||
| 289 | DomainComponent refComp = relation.getReference().getComponent(); |
||
| 290 | // activate relation |
||
| 291 | refComp.activate(relation); |
||
| 292 | // add relation to committed list |
||
| 293 | rActivated.add(relation); |
||
| 294 | } |
||
| 295 | |||
| 296 | // check consistency |
||
| 297 | this.tdb.verify(); |
||
| 298 | this.pdb.verify(); |
||
| 299 | |||
| 300 | } catch (DecisionPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) { |
||
| 301 | |||
| 302 | // deactivate activated relations |
||
| 303 | for (Relation rel : rActivated) { |
||
| 304 | |||
| 305 | // get reference component |
||
| 306 | DomainComponent refComp = rel.getReference().getComponent(); |
||
| 307 | // deactivate relation |
||
| 308 | refComp.deactivate(rel); |
||
| 309 | } |
||
| 310 | |||
| 311 | // remove restored relations |
||
| 312 | for (Relation rel : rRestored) { |
||
| 313 | // get reference component |
||
| 314 | DomainComponent refComp = rel.getReference().getComponent(); |
||
| 315 | // deactivate relation |
||
| 316 | refComp.delete(rel); |
||
| 317 | } |
||
| 318 | |||
| 319 | // deactivate decisions |
||
| 320 | for (Decision dec : dActivated) { |
||
| 321 | // get decision component |
||
| 322 | DomainComponent decComp = dec.getComponent(); |
||
| 323 | // deactivate decision |
||
| 324 | decComp.deactivate(dec); |
||
| 325 | } |
||
| 326 | |||
| 327 | // remove restored decisions |
||
| 328 | for (Decision dec: dRestored) { |
||
| 329 | // get decision component |
||
| 330 | DomainComponent decComp = dec.getComponent(); |
||
| 331 | // free decision |
||
| 332 | decComp.free(dec); |
||
| 333 | } |
||
| 334 | |||
| 335 | // throw exception |
||
| 336 | throw new DecisionPropagationException(ex.getMessage()); |
||
| 337 | } |
||
| 354 |