|
1
|
|
|
package it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.timeline.scheduling; |
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
import java.util.ArrayList; |
|
4
|
|
|
import java.util.Collections; |
|
5
|
|
|
import java.util.List; |
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.domain.component.Decision; |
|
8
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.domain.component.ex.FlawSolutionApplicationException; |
|
9
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.domain.component.ex.RelationPropagationException; |
|
10
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.domain.component.sv.StateVariable; |
|
11
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.ex.ConsistencyCheckException; |
|
12
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.flaw.Flaw; |
|
13
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.flaw.FlawSolution; |
|
14
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.relations.RelationType; |
|
15
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.lang.relations.temporal.BeforeRelation; |
|
16
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.query.TemporalQueryType; |
|
17
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.Resolver; |
|
18
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.ResolverType; |
|
19
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.microkernel.resolver.ex.UnsolvableFlawException; |
|
20
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.time.TemporalInterval; |
|
21
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.time.ex.TemporalConstraintPropagationException; |
|
22
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.time.lang.TemporalConstraintType; |
|
23
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.time.lang.allen.BeforeIntervalConstraint; |
|
24
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.time.lang.query.IntervalOverlapQuery; |
|
25
|
|
|
import it.cnr.istc.pst.platinum.ai.framework.utils.properties.FilePropertyReader; |
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
/** |
|
28
|
|
|
* |
|
29
|
|
|
* @author alessandro |
|
30
|
|
|
* |
|
31
|
|
|
*/ |
|
32
|
|
|
public final class TimelineSchedulingResolver extends Resolver<StateVariable> |
|
33
|
|
|
{ |
|
34
|
|
|
private boolean load; |
|
35
|
|
|
private double schedulingCost; |
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
/** |
|
38
|
|
|
* |
|
39
|
|
|
*/ |
|
40
|
|
|
protected TimelineSchedulingResolver() { |
|
41
|
|
|
super(ResolverType.TIMELINE_SCHEDULING_RESOLVER.getLabel(), |
|
42
|
|
|
ResolverType.TIMELINE_SCHEDULING_RESOLVER.getFlawTypes()); |
|
43
|
|
|
// set load flag |
|
44
|
|
|
this.load = false; |
|
45
|
|
|
} |
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
/** |
|
48
|
|
|
* |
|
49
|
|
|
*/ |
|
50
|
|
|
private void load() { |
|
51
|
|
|
// get deliberative property file |
|
52
|
|
|
FilePropertyReader properties = new FilePropertyReader( |
|
53
|
|
|
FRAMEWORK_HOME + FilePropertyReader.DEFAULT_DELIBERATIVE_PROPERTY); |
|
54
|
|
|
// get weight |
|
55
|
|
|
this.schedulingCost = Double.parseDouble(properties.getProperty("scheduling-cost")); |
|
56
|
|
|
// set flag |
|
57
|
|
|
this.load = true; |
|
58
|
|
|
} |
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
/** |
|
61
|
|
|
* |
|
62
|
|
|
*/ |
|
63
|
|
|
@Override |
|
64
|
|
|
protected void doApply(FlawSolution solution) |
|
65
|
|
|
throws FlawSolutionApplicationException { |
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
// get the flaw solution to consider |
|
68
|
|
|
OverlappingSetSchedule schedule = (OverlappingSetSchedule) solution; |
|
69
|
|
|
// list of committed relations |
|
70
|
|
|
List<BeforeRelation> committed = new ArrayList<>(); |
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
try { |
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
// apply all precedence constraints |
|
75
|
|
|
for (PrecedenceConstraint pc : schedule.getConstraints()) { |
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
// get reference and target decisions |
|
78
|
|
|
Decision reference = pc.getReference(); |
|
79
|
|
|
Decision target = pc.getTarget(); |
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
// create relation |
|
82
|
|
|
BeforeRelation before = this.component.create( |
|
83
|
|
|
RelationType.BEFORE, |
|
84
|
|
|
reference, |
|
85
|
|
|
target); |
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
// set bounds |
|
88
|
|
|
before.setBound(new long[] { |
|
89
|
|
|
0, |
|
90
|
|
|
this.component.getHorizon()}); |
|
91
|
|
|
// add created relation to solution |
|
92
|
|
|
solution.addCreatedRelation(before); |
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
// add relation to committed |
|
95
|
|
|
committed.add(before); |
|
96
|
|
|
// propagate relations |
|
97
|
|
|
this.component.activate(before); |
|
98
|
|
|
// add activated relations to solution |
|
99
|
|
|
solution.addActivatedRelation(before); |
|
100
|
|
|
// check feasibility |
|
101
|
|
|
this.tdb.verify(); |
|
102
|
|
|
} |
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
} catch (RelationPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) { |
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
// write error message |
|
107
|
|
|
error("Error while applying flaw solution:\n" |
|
108
|
|
|
+ "- solution: " + solution + "\n"); |
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
// clear data structure by remove all committed relations |
|
111
|
|
|
for (BeforeRelation before : committed) { |
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
// deactivate relation |
|
114
|
|
|
this.component.deactivate(before); |
|
115
|
|
|
// delete relation |
|
116
|
|
|
this.component.delete(before); |
|
117
|
|
|
} |
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
// not feasible solution |
|
120
|
|
|
throw new FlawSolutionApplicationException(ex.getMessage()); |
|
121
|
|
|
} |
|
122
|
|
|
} |
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
// protected void doApply(FlawSolution solution) |
|
126
|
|
|
// throws FlawSolutionApplicationException |
|
127
|
|
|
// { |
|
128
|
|
|
// // get the flaw solution to consider |
|
129
|
|
|
// DecisionPrecedenceConstraint pc = (DecisionPrecedenceConstraint) solution; |
|
130
|
|
|
// // get reference and target decisions |
|
131
|
|
|
// Decision reference = pc.getReference(); |
|
132
|
|
|
// Decision target = pc.getTarget(); |
|
133
|
|
|
// |
|
134
|
|
|
// // create relation |
|
135
|
|
|
// BeforeRelation before = this.component.create(RelationType.BEFORE, reference, target); |
|
136
|
|
|
// // set bounds |
|
137
|
|
|
// before.setBound(new long[] { |
|
138
|
|
|
// 0, |
|
139
|
|
|
// this.component.getHorizon()}); |
|
140
|
|
|
// // add created relation to solution |
|
141
|
|
|
// solution.addCreatedRelation(before); |
|
142
|
|
|
// |
|
143
|
|
|
// try |
|
144
|
|
|
// { |
|
145
|
|
|
// // propagate relations |
|
146
|
|
|
// this.component.activate(before); |
|
147
|
|
|
// // add activated relations to solution |
|
148
|
|
|
// solution.addActivatedRelation(before); |
|
149
|
|
|
// debug("Precedence constraint successfully created and activated:\n" |
|
150
|
|
|
// + "- temporal constraint: " + before + "\n"); |
|
151
|
|
|
// |
|
152
|
|
|
// // check feasibility |
|
153
|
|
|
// this.tdb.verify(); |
|
154
|
|
|
// } |
|
155
|
|
|
// catch (RelationPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) |
|
156
|
|
|
// { |
|
157
|
|
|
// // write error message |
|
158
|
|
|
// error("Error while applying flaw solution:\n" |
|
159
|
|
|
// + "- solution: " + solution + "\n" |
|
160
|
|
|
// + "- unfeasible precedence constraint: " + before + "\n"); |
|
161
|
|
|
// |
|
162
|
|
|
// // deactivate relation |
|
163
|
|
|
// this.component.deactivate(before); |
|
164
|
|
|
// // delete relation |
|
165
|
|
|
// this.component.delete(before); |
|
166
|
|
|
// // not feasible solution |
|
167
|
|
|
// throw new FlawSolutionApplicationException(ex.getMessage()); |
|
168
|
|
|
// } |
|
169
|
|
|
// } |
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
/** |
|
172
|
|
|
* |
|
173
|
|
|
*/ |
|
174
|
|
|
@Override |
|
175
|
|
|
protected List<Flaw> doFindFlaws() { |
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
// check flag |
|
178
|
|
|
if (!this.load) { |
|
179
|
|
|
this.load(); |
|
180
|
|
|
} |
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
// list of critical sets |
|
183
|
|
|
List<Flaw> CSs = new ArrayList<>(); |
|
184
|
|
|
// list of active decisions |
|
185
|
|
|
List<Decision> decisions = this.component.getActiveDecisions(); |
|
186
|
|
|
// sort decisions |
|
187
|
|
|
Collections.sort(decisions); |
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
// look for critical sets |
|
190
|
|
|
for (int index = 0; index < decisions.size() - 1; index++) { |
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
// get active decision |
|
193
|
|
|
Decision activity = decisions.get(index); |
|
194
|
|
|
// prepare a critical set |
|
195
|
|
|
OverlappingSet cs = new OverlappingSet( |
|
196
|
|
|
FLAW_COUNTER.getAndIncrement(), |
|
197
|
|
|
this.component); |
|
198
|
|
|
// add current activity |
|
199
|
|
|
cs.add(activity); |
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
// find possibly overlapping decisions |
|
202
|
|
|
for (int jndex = index + 1; jndex < decisions.size(); jndex++) { |
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
// get another activity of the component |
|
205
|
|
|
Decision other = decisions.get(jndex); |
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
// check overlapping condition with the critical set |
|
208
|
|
|
if (this.conflict(cs, other)) { |
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
// add the activity to the critical set |
|
211
|
|
|
cs.add(other); |
|
212
|
|
|
} |
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
} |
|
215
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
// check the size of the critical set |
|
217
|
|
|
if (cs.size() > 1) { |
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
// the critical set actually represents a flaw of the component |
|
220
|
|
|
CSs.add(cs); |
|
221
|
|
|
} |
|
222
|
|
|
} |
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
// get the list of critical sets found |
|
225
|
|
|
return CSs; |
|
226
|
|
|
} |
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
/** |
|
229
|
|
|
* Check if an activity overlaps ALL the activities composing a Critical Set |
|
230
|
|
|
* |
|
231
|
|
|
* @param cs |
|
232
|
|
|
* @param activity |
|
233
|
|
|
* @return |
|
234
|
|
|
*/ |
|
235
|
|
|
private boolean conflict(OverlappingSet cs, Decision activity) { |
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
// conflicting flag |
|
238
|
|
|
boolean conflict = true; |
|
239
|
|
|
// get events of the critical set |
|
240
|
|
|
List<Decision> activities = cs.getDecisions(); |
|
241
|
|
|
// check set of events |
|
242
|
|
|
for (int index = 0; index < activities.size() && conflict; index++) { |
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
// get an activity of the critical set |
|
245
|
|
|
Decision csActivity = activities.get(index); |
|
246
|
|
|
// check overlapping condition |
|
247
|
|
|
IntervalOverlapQuery query = this.tdb.createTemporalQuery(TemporalQueryType.INTERVAL_OVERLAP); |
|
248
|
|
|
// set intervals |
|
249
|
|
|
query.setReference(csActivity.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
250
|
|
|
query.setTarget(activity.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
251
|
|
|
// process query |
|
252
|
|
|
this.tdb.process(query); |
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
// check whether the (flexible) temporal interval can overlap or not |
|
255
|
|
|
conflict = query.canOverlap(); |
|
256
|
|
|
} |
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
// get result |
|
259
|
|
|
return conflict; |
|
260
|
|
|
} |
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
// @Override |
|
264
|
|
|
// protected List<Flaw> doFindFlaws() { |
|
265
|
|
|
// |
|
266
|
|
|
// // check flag |
|
267
|
|
|
// if (!this.load) { |
|
268
|
|
|
// this.load(); |
|
269
|
|
|
// } |
|
270
|
|
|
// |
|
271
|
|
|
// // list of critical sets |
|
272
|
|
|
// List<Flaw> flaws = new ArrayList<>(); |
|
273
|
|
|
// // list of active decisions |
|
274
|
|
|
// List<Decision> decisions = this.component.getActiveDecisions(); |
|
275
|
|
|
// // sort decisions |
|
276
|
|
|
// Collections.sort(decisions); |
|
277
|
|
|
// |
|
278
|
|
|
// |
|
279
|
|
|
// // look for peaks |
|
280
|
|
|
// for (int index = 0; index < decisions.size() - 1; index++) { |
|
281
|
|
|
// // get active decision |
|
282
|
|
|
// Decision reference = decisions.get(index); |
|
283
|
|
|
// // find possibly overlapping decisions |
|
284
|
|
|
// for (int jndex = index + 1; jndex < decisions.size(); jndex++) |
|
285
|
|
|
// { |
|
286
|
|
|
// // get another active decision |
|
287
|
|
|
// Decision target = decisions.get(jndex); |
|
288
|
|
|
// // check if intervals can overlap |
|
289
|
|
|
// IntervalOverlapQuery query = this.tdb.createTemporalQuery( |
|
290
|
|
|
// TemporalQueryType.INTERVAL_OVERLAP); |
|
291
|
|
|
// |
|
292
|
|
|
// // set time points |
|
293
|
|
|
// query.setReference(reference.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
294
|
|
|
// query.setTarget(target.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
295
|
|
|
// // process query |
|
296
|
|
|
// this.tdb.process(query); |
|
297
|
|
|
// // check overlapping |
|
298
|
|
|
// if (query.canOverlap()) |
|
299
|
|
|
// { |
|
300
|
|
|
// // conflict found |
|
301
|
|
|
// BinaryDecisionConflict c = new BinaryDecisionConflict( |
|
302
|
|
|
// FLAW_COUNTER.getAndIncrement(), |
|
303
|
|
|
// this.component); |
|
304
|
|
|
// |
|
305
|
|
|
// // set overlapping decisions |
|
306
|
|
|
// c.setDecisions(new Decision[] { |
|
307
|
|
|
// reference, |
|
308
|
|
|
// target |
|
309
|
|
|
// }); |
|
310
|
|
|
// |
|
311
|
|
|
// // check if decisions overlaps |
|
312
|
|
|
// debug("Overlapping tokens:\n" |
|
313
|
|
|
// + "- component: " + this.component + "\n" |
|
314
|
|
|
// + "- reference token: " + reference + "\n" |
|
315
|
|
|
// + "- target token: " + target + "\n"); |
|
316
|
|
|
// |
|
317
|
|
|
// // add conflict |
|
318
|
|
|
// flaws.add(c); |
|
319
|
|
|
// |
|
320
|
|
|
// |
|
321
|
|
|
// } else { |
|
322
|
|
|
// |
|
323
|
|
|
// // check if decisions overlaps |
|
324
|
|
|
// debug("NOT overlapping tokens:\n" |
|
325
|
|
|
// + "- component: " + this.component + "\n" |
|
326
|
|
|
// + "- reference token: " + reference + "\n" |
|
327
|
|
|
// + "- target token: " + target + "\n"); |
|
328
|
|
|
// } |
|
329
|
|
|
// } |
|
330
|
|
|
// } |
|
331
|
|
|
// |
|
332
|
|
|
// // get the list |
|
333
|
|
|
// return flaws; |
|
334
|
|
|
// } |
|
335
|
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
/** |
|
337
|
|
|
* |
|
338
|
|
|
*/ |
|
339
|
|
|
@Override |
|
340
|
|
|
protected void doComputeFlawSolutions(Flaw flaw) |
|
341
|
|
|
throws UnsolvableFlawException { |
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
// get the critical set |
|
344
|
|
|
OverlappingSet cs = (OverlappingSet) flaw; |
|
345
|
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
/* |
|
347
|
|
|
* A state variable does not allow any pair of overlapping of its activities. |
|
348
|
|
|
* |
|
349
|
|
|
* Each total ordering of the activities that compose a critical set may represent a solution |
|
350
|
|
|
* |
|
351
|
|
|
*/ |
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
// compute all possible solutions of the critical set |
|
354
|
|
|
this.computeCriticalSetSolutions(cs); |
|
355
|
|
|
} |
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
/** |
|
358
|
|
|
* |
|
359
|
|
|
* @param cs |
|
360
|
|
|
* @throws UnsolvableFlawException |
|
361
|
|
|
*/ |
|
362
|
|
|
private void computeCriticalSetSolutions(OverlappingSet cs) |
|
363
|
|
|
throws UnsolvableFlawException { |
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
// get the list of overlapping activities |
|
366
|
|
|
List<Decision> activities = new ArrayList<>(cs.getDecisions()); |
|
367
|
|
|
// compute feasible schedules |
|
368
|
|
|
this.doFindFeasibleSchedule(new ArrayList<>(), activities, cs); |
|
369
|
|
|
// check if no feasible solution exists |
|
370
|
|
|
if (cs.getSolutions().isEmpty()) { |
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
// unsolvable flaw |
|
373
|
|
|
throw new UnsolvableFlawException("Unsolvable flaw found on componnet \"" + this.component + "\"\n" |
|
374
|
|
|
+ "- flaw: " + cs + "\n\n"); |
|
375
|
|
|
} |
|
376
|
|
|
} |
|
377
|
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
/** |
|
379
|
|
|
* A solution to a critical set on a State Variable is a total ordering of the activities of the critical set. |
|
380
|
|
|
* |
|
381
|
|
|
* This method computes all possible orderings of the activities that are part of a critical set (i.e., the |
|
382
|
|
|
* permutations). The permutations that represent valid temporal constraints are considered as valid |
|
383
|
|
|
* solutions to the critical set |
|
384
|
|
|
* |
|
385
|
|
|
* @param schedule |
|
386
|
|
|
* @param cs |
|
387
|
|
|
* @param flaw |
|
388
|
|
|
*/ |
|
389
|
|
|
private void doFindFeasibleSchedule(List<Decision> schedule, List<Decision> cs, OverlappingSet flaw) { |
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
// check if a schedule is ready for temporal checking |
|
392
|
|
|
if (cs.isEmpty()) { |
|
393
|
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
// check schedule resource feasibility first and then temporal feasibility |
|
395
|
|
|
if (this.checkTemporalFeasibility(schedule)) { |
|
396
|
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
// create flaw solution |
|
398
|
|
|
OverlappingSetSchedule solution = new OverlappingSetSchedule(flaw, this.schedulingCost); |
|
399
|
|
|
// set resulting constraints |
|
400
|
|
|
for (int i= 0; i < schedule.size() - 1; i++) { |
|
401
|
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
// add precedence constraint |
|
403
|
|
|
solution.addConstraint(schedule.get(i), schedule.get(i + 1)); |
|
404
|
|
|
} |
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
// add solution to the flaw |
|
407
|
|
|
flaw.addSolution(solution); |
|
408
|
|
|
} |
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
} else { |
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
// check possible schedules until no solution is found |
|
413
|
|
|
for (int index = 0; index < cs.size(); index++) { |
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
// get an activity from the critical set |
|
416
|
|
|
Decision activity = cs.remove(index); |
|
417
|
|
|
// add the activity to the possible schedule |
|
418
|
|
|
schedule.add(activity); |
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
// recursively build the permutation |
|
421
|
|
|
this.doFindFeasibleSchedule(schedule, cs, flaw); |
|
422
|
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
// remove event from the permutation |
|
424
|
|
|
schedule.remove(activity); |
|
425
|
|
|
// restore data of the critical set |
|
426
|
|
|
cs.add(index, activity); |
|
427
|
|
|
} |
|
428
|
|
|
} |
|
429
|
|
|
} |
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
/** |
|
432
|
|
|
* |
|
433
|
|
|
* @param schedule |
|
434
|
|
|
* @return |
|
435
|
|
|
*/ |
|
436
|
|
View Code Duplication |
private boolean checkTemporalFeasibility(List<Decision> schedule) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
// feasibility flag |
|
439
|
|
|
boolean feasible = true; |
|
440
|
|
|
// list of propagated constraints |
|
441
|
|
|
List<BeforeIntervalConstraint> committed = new ArrayList<>(); |
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
// check pairs of events |
|
444
|
|
|
for (int index = 0; index < schedule.size() - 1 && feasible; index++) { |
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
try { |
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
// get activities |
|
449
|
|
|
Decision a1 = schedule.get(index); |
|
450
|
|
|
Decision a2 = schedule.get(index + 1); |
|
451
|
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
// get associated tokens and temporal intervals to check schedule feasibility |
|
453
|
|
|
TemporalInterval i1 = a1.getToken().getInterval(); |
|
454
|
|
|
TemporalInterval i2 = a2.getToken().getInterval(); |
|
455
|
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
// create precedence constraint "i1 < i2" |
|
457
|
|
|
BeforeIntervalConstraint before = this.tdb.createTemporalConstraint( |
|
458
|
|
|
TemporalConstraintType.BEFORE); |
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
// set constraint data |
|
461
|
|
|
before.setReference(i1); |
|
462
|
|
|
before.setTarget(i2); |
|
463
|
|
|
before.setLowerBound(0); |
|
464
|
|
|
before.setUpperBound(this.tdb.getHorizon()); |
|
465
|
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
// add constraints to committed |
|
467
|
|
|
committed.add(before); |
|
468
|
|
|
// propagate constraint |
|
469
|
|
|
this.tdb.propagate(before); |
|
470
|
|
|
// check temporal feasibility |
|
471
|
|
|
this.tdb.verify(); |
|
472
|
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
} catch (TemporalConstraintPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) { |
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
// not feasible schedule |
|
476
|
|
|
feasible = false; |
|
477
|
|
|
// log data |
|
478
|
|
|
debug("Component [" + this.label + "] temporally unfeasible schedule:\n" |
|
479
|
|
|
+ "- potential schedule critical set: " + schedule + "\n"); |
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
} finally { |
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
// retract all committed constraints |
|
484
|
|
|
for (BeforeIntervalConstraint before : committed) { |
|
485
|
|
|
// retract temporal constraint |
|
486
|
|
|
this.tdb.retract(before); |
|
487
|
|
|
} |
|
488
|
|
|
} |
|
489
|
|
|
} |
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
// get feasibility flag |
|
492
|
|
|
return feasible; |
|
493
|
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
} |
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
// @Override |
|
497
|
|
|
// protected void doComputeFlawSolutions(Flaw flaw) |
|
498
|
|
|
// throws UnsolvableFlawException |
|
499
|
|
|
// { |
|
500
|
|
|
// // get detected conflict |
|
501
|
|
|
// BinaryDecisionConflict conflict = (BinaryDecisionConflict) flaw; |
|
502
|
|
|
// |
|
503
|
|
|
// // check possible precedence constraints |
|
504
|
|
|
// Decision reference = conflict.getDecisions()[0]; |
|
505
|
|
|
// Decision target = conflict.getDecisions()[1]; |
|
506
|
|
|
// // create possible solutions |
|
507
|
|
|
// DecisionPrecedenceConstraint pc1 = new DecisionPrecedenceConstraint(conflict, reference, target, this.schedulingCost); |
|
508
|
|
|
// DecisionPrecedenceConstraint pc2 = new DecisionPrecedenceConstraint(conflict, target, reference, this.schedulingCost); |
|
509
|
|
|
// |
|
510
|
|
|
// // temporal constraints |
|
511
|
|
|
// BeforeIntervalConstraint before1 = null; |
|
512
|
|
|
// BeforeIntervalConstraint before2 = null; |
|
513
|
|
|
// |
|
514
|
|
|
// try { |
|
515
|
|
|
// |
|
516
|
|
|
// // create temporal constraint |
|
517
|
|
|
// before1 = this.tdb.createTemporalConstraint(TemporalConstraintType.BEFORE); |
|
518
|
|
|
// before1.setLowerBound(0); |
|
519
|
|
|
// before1.setUpperBound(this.component.getHorizon()); |
|
520
|
|
|
// before1.setReference(reference.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
521
|
|
|
// before1.setTarget(target.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
522
|
|
|
// |
|
523
|
|
|
// // propagate interval constraint |
|
524
|
|
|
// this.tdb.propagate(before1); |
|
525
|
|
|
// // check consistency |
|
526
|
|
|
// this.tdb.verify(); |
|
527
|
|
|
// |
|
528
|
|
|
// // add solution and deactivate relation |
|
529
|
|
|
// conflict.addSolution(pc1); |
|
530
|
|
|
// } |
|
531
|
|
|
// catch (TemporalConstraintPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) { |
|
532
|
|
|
// // discard relation |
|
533
|
|
|
// debug("Unfeasible precedence constraint:\n" |
|
534
|
|
|
// + "\t- reference: " + reference + "\n" |
|
535
|
|
|
// + "\t- target: " + target + "\n"); |
|
536
|
|
|
// } |
|
537
|
|
|
// finally { |
|
538
|
|
|
// |
|
539
|
|
|
// // remove constraint |
|
540
|
|
|
// if (before1 != null) { |
|
541
|
|
|
// // retract constraint |
|
542
|
|
|
// this.tdb.retract(before1); |
|
543
|
|
|
// // clear constraint |
|
544
|
|
|
// before1.clear(); |
|
545
|
|
|
// } |
|
546
|
|
|
// } |
|
547
|
|
|
// |
|
548
|
|
|
// |
|
549
|
|
|
// try { |
|
550
|
|
|
// |
|
551
|
|
|
// // create temporal constraint |
|
552
|
|
|
// before2 = this.tdb.createTemporalConstraint(TemporalConstraintType.BEFORE); |
|
553
|
|
|
// before2.setLowerBound(0); |
|
554
|
|
|
// before2.setUpperBound(this.component.getHorizon()); |
|
555
|
|
|
// before2.setReference(target.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
556
|
|
|
// before2.setTarget(reference.getToken().getInterval()); |
|
557
|
|
|
// |
|
558
|
|
|
// // propagate interval constraint |
|
559
|
|
|
// this.tdb.propagate(before2); |
|
560
|
|
|
// // check consistency |
|
561
|
|
|
// this.tdb.verify(); |
|
562
|
|
|
// |
|
563
|
|
|
// // add solution and deactivate relation |
|
564
|
|
|
// conflict.addSolution(pc2); |
|
565
|
|
|
// } |
|
566
|
|
|
// catch (TemporalConstraintPropagationException | ConsistencyCheckException ex) { |
|
567
|
|
|
// // discard relation |
|
568
|
|
|
// debug("Unfeasible precedence constraint:\n" |
|
569
|
|
|
// + "\t- reference: " + target + "\n" |
|
570
|
|
|
// + "\t- target: " + reference + "\n"); |
|
571
|
|
|
// } |
|
572
|
|
|
// finally { |
|
573
|
|
|
// |
|
574
|
|
|
// // remove constraint |
|
575
|
|
|
// if (before2 != null) { |
|
576
|
|
|
// // retract constraint |
|
577
|
|
|
// this.tdb.retract(before2); |
|
578
|
|
|
// // clear constraint |
|
579
|
|
|
// before2.clear(); |
|
580
|
|
|
// } |
|
581
|
|
|
// } |
|
582
|
|
|
// |
|
583
|
|
|
// |
|
584
|
|
|
// // check if any solution has been found |
|
585
|
|
|
// if (conflict.getSolutions().isEmpty()) { |
|
586
|
|
|
// throw new UnsolvableFlawException("Unsolvable decision conflict on timeline:\n" |
|
587
|
|
|
// + "\t- component: " + this.component.getName() + "\n" |
|
588
|
|
|
// + "\t- decisions: " + conflict.getDecisions()[0] + ", " + conflict.getDecisions()[1] + "\n"); |
|
589
|
|
|
// } |
|
590
|
|
|
// } |
|
591
|
|
|
} |
|
592
|
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|