This project does not seem to handle request data directly as such no vulnerable execution paths were found.
include
, or for example
via PHP's auto-loading mechanism.
These results are based on our legacy PHP analysis, consider migrating to our new PHP analysis engine instead. Learn more
1 | <?php |
||
2 | |||
3 | namespace prgTW\BaseCRM\Resource; |
||
4 | |||
5 | use Doctrine\Common\Inflector\Inflector; |
||
6 | use prgTW\BaseCRM\Exception\ResourceException; |
||
7 | |||
8 | abstract class BaseResource |
||
9 | { |
||
10 | const ENDPOINT_APP = 'https://app.futuresimple.com'; |
||
11 | const ENDPOINT_COMMON = 'https://common.futuresimple.com'; |
||
12 | const ENDPOINT_CORE = 'https://core.futuresimple.com'; |
||
13 | const ENDPOINT_CRM = 'https://crm.futuresimple.com'; |
||
14 | const ENDPOINT_LEADS = 'https://leads.futuresimple.com'; |
||
15 | const ENDPOINT_SALES = 'https://sales.futuresimple.com'; |
||
16 | const ENDPOINT_TAGS = 'https://tags.futuresimple.com'; |
||
17 | |||
18 | const PREFIX = 'api/v1'; |
||
19 | |||
20 | /** @var array */ |
||
21 | protected $data = null; |
||
22 | |||
23 | /** |
||
24 | * @param string $resourceClassName Fully classified class name |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
25 | * |
||
26 | * @return string |
||
27 | */ |
||
28 | protected function getClassNameOnly($resourceClassName = null) |
||
29 | { |
||
30 | $name = null === $resourceClassName ? static::class : $resourceClassName; |
||
31 | $name = explode('\\', $name); |
||
32 | $name = end($name); |
||
33 | |||
34 | return $name; |
||
35 | } |
||
36 | |||
37 | /** |
||
38 | * @param string $resourceClassName Fully classified class name |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Should the type for parameter
$resourceClassName not be string|null ?
This check looks for It makes a suggestion as to what type it considers more descriptive. Most often this is a case of a parameter that can be null in addition to its declared types. ![]() |
|||
39 | * |
||
40 | * @return string |
||
41 | */ |
||
42 | public function getResourceName($resourceClassName = null) |
||
43 | { |
||
44 | $name = $this->getClassNameOnly($resourceClassName); |
||
45 | |||
46 | return Inflector::tableize($name); |
||
47 | } |
||
48 | |||
49 | /** |
||
50 | * @param string $resourceClassName Fully classified class name |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Should the type for parameter
$resourceClassName not be string|null ?
This check looks for It makes a suggestion as to what type it considers more descriptive. Most often this is a case of a parameter that can be null in addition to its declared types. ![]() |
|||
51 | * |
||
52 | * @return string |
||
53 | */ |
||
54 | protected function getChildResourceName($resourceClassName = null) |
||
55 | { |
||
56 | $resourceName = $this->getResourceName($resourceClassName); |
||
57 | $singular = Inflector::singularize($resourceName); |
||
58 | |||
59 | return $singular; |
||
60 | } |
||
61 | |||
62 | /** |
||
63 | * @param array $data |
||
64 | */ |
||
65 | protected function hydrate(array $data) |
||
66 | { |
||
67 | $this->data = []; |
||
68 | View Code Duplication | foreach ($data as $key => $value) |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This code seems to be duplicated across your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
69 | { |
||
70 | $setter = sprintf('set%s', ucfirst(Inflector::camelize($key))); |
||
71 | if (method_exists($this, $setter)) |
||
72 | { |
||
73 | $this->$setter($value); |
||
74 | } |
||
75 | else |
||
76 | { |
||
77 | $this->data[$key] = $value; |
||
78 | } |
||
79 | } |
||
80 | |||
81 | $this->postHydrate($data); |
||
82 | } |
||
83 | |||
84 | /** |
||
85 | * @param array $fieldNames |
||
86 | * |
||
87 | * @throws ResourceException when dehydration has been stopped |
||
88 | * @return array |
||
89 | */ |
||
90 | protected function dehydrate(array $fieldNames = []) |
||
91 | { |
||
92 | $result = $this->preDehydrate($fieldNames); |
||
93 | if (false === $result) |
||
94 | { |
||
95 | //@codeCoverageIgnoreStart |
||
96 | throw new ResourceException('Dehydration has been stopped'); |
||
97 | //@codeCoverageIgnoreEnd |
||
98 | } |
||
99 | |||
100 | if (is_array($result)) |
||
101 | { |
||
102 | $fieldNames = $result; |
||
103 | } |
||
104 | |||
105 | $data = []; |
||
106 | if ([] === $fieldNames) |
||
107 | { |
||
108 | $data = $this->data; |
||
109 | } |
||
110 | else |
||
111 | { |
||
112 | View Code Duplication | foreach ($fieldNames as $fieldName) |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This code seems to be duplicated across your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
113 | { |
||
114 | $getter = sprintf('get%s', ucfirst(Inflector::camelize($fieldName))); |
||
115 | $data[$fieldName] = method_exists($this, $getter) ? $this->$getter() : $this->data[$fieldName]; |
||
116 | } |
||
117 | } |
||
118 | |||
119 | $this->postDehydrate($data); |
||
120 | |||
121 | return $data; |
||
122 | } |
||
123 | |||
124 | /** |
||
125 | * @param string $name |
||
126 | * |
||
127 | * @return bool |
||
128 | */ |
||
129 | View Code Duplication | public function __isset($name) |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
130 | { |
||
131 | $issetter = sprintf('isset%s', ucfirst(Inflector::camelize($name))); |
||
132 | if (method_exists($this, $issetter)) |
||
133 | { |
||
134 | return $this->$issetter(); |
||
135 | } |
||
136 | |||
137 | $key = Inflector::tableize($name); |
||
138 | if (array_key_exists($key, $this->data)) |
||
139 | { |
||
140 | return true; |
||
141 | } |
||
142 | |||
143 | return isset($this->$name); |
||
144 | } |
||
145 | |||
146 | /** |
||
147 | * @param string $name |
||
148 | * |
||
149 | * @return mixed |
||
150 | */ |
||
151 | View Code Duplication | public function __get($name) |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
152 | { |
||
153 | $getter = sprintf('get%s', ucfirst(Inflector::camelize($name))); |
||
154 | if (method_exists($this, $getter)) |
||
155 | { |
||
156 | return $this->$getter(); |
||
157 | } |
||
158 | |||
159 | $key = Inflector::tableize($name); |
||
160 | if (array_key_exists($key, $this->data)) |
||
161 | { |
||
162 | return $this->data[$key]; |
||
163 | } |
||
164 | |||
165 | return $this->$name; |
||
166 | } |
||
167 | |||
168 | /** |
||
169 | * @param string $name |
||
170 | * @param mixed $value |
||
171 | */ |
||
172 | public function __set($name, $value) |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The return type could not be reliably inferred; please add a
@return annotation.
Our type inference engine in quite powerful, but sometimes the code does not
provide enough clues to go by. In these cases we request you to add a ![]() |
|||
173 | { |
||
174 | $setter = sprintf('set%s', ucfirst(Inflector::camelize($name))); |
||
175 | if (method_exists($this, $setter)) |
||
176 | { |
||
177 | return $this->$setter($value); |
||
178 | } |
||
179 | |||
180 | $key = Inflector::tableize($name); |
||
181 | $this->data[$key] = $value; |
||
182 | } |
||
183 | |||
184 | /** |
||
185 | * @param array $data |
||
186 | * |
||
187 | * @codeCoverageIgnore |
||
188 | */ |
||
189 | protected function postHydrate(array $data) |
||
190 | { |
||
191 | |||
192 | } |
||
193 | |||
194 | /** |
||
195 | * @param array $fieldNames |
||
196 | * |
||
197 | * @return array|bool False: stop dehydration, array: new field names |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Should the return type not be
array|boolean|null ? Also, consider making the array more specific, something like array<String> , or String[] .
This check compares the return type specified in the If the return type contains the type array, this check recommends the use of
a more specific type like ![]() |
|||
198 | * |
||
199 | * @codeCoverageIgnore |
||
200 | */ |
||
201 | protected function preDehydrate(array $fieldNames) |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
202 | { |
||
203 | |||
204 | } |
||
205 | |||
206 | /** |
||
207 | * @param array $data |
||
208 | * |
||
209 | * @codeCoverageIgnore |
||
210 | */ |
||
211 | protected function postDehydrate(array &$data) |
||
212 | { |
||
213 | |||
214 | } |
||
215 | } |
||
216 |
This check looks for
@param
annotations where the type inferred by our type inference engine differs from the declared type.It makes a suggestion as to what type it considers more descriptive.
Most often this is a case of a parameter that can be null in addition to its declared types.