GitHub Access Token became invalid

It seems like the GitHub access token used for retrieving details about this repository from GitHub became invalid. This might prevent certain types of inspections from being run (in particular, everything related to pull requests).
Please ask an admin of your repository to re-new the access token on this website.

RejectedPromise   A
last analyzed

Complexity

Total Complexity 11

Size/Duplication

Total Lines 85
Duplicated Lines 0 %

Coupling/Cohesion

Components 1
Dependencies 2

Importance

Changes 2
Bugs 0 Features 0
Metric Value
wmc 11
c 2
b 0
f 0
lcom 1
cbo 2
dl 0
loc 85
rs 10

5 Methods

Rating   Name   Duplication   Size   Complexity  
A __construct() 0 10 2
B then() 0 25 5
A resolve() 0 8 1
A reject() 0 11 2
A currentState() 0 4 1
1
<?php
2
3
namespace Gandung\Promise;
4
5
/**
6
 * @author Paulus Gandung Prakosa <[email protected]>
7
 */
8
class RejectedPromise implements PromiseInterface
9
{
10
    /**
11
     * @var mixed
12
     */
13
    private $reason;
14
15
    /**
16
     * {@inheritdoc}
17
     */
18
    public function __construct($reason)
19
    {
20
        if (method_exists($reason, 'then')) {
21
            throw new \InvalidArgumentException(
22
                sprintf("Unable to get instance of %s with promise as constructor parameter.", __CLASS__)
23
            );
24
        }
25
26
        $this->reason = $reason;
27
    }
28
29
    /**
30
     * {@inheritdoc}
31
     */
32
    public function then($onFulfilled = null, $onRejected = null)
33
    {
34
        if (!$onRejected) {
35
            return $this;
0 ignored issues
show
Bug Best Practice introduced by
The return type of return $this; (Gandung\Promise\RejectedPromise) is incompatible with the return type declared by the interface Gandung\Promise\PromiseInterface::then of type Gandung\Promise\Promise.

If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method. This is more formally defined by the Lizkov substitution principle, and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the SOLID principles for object oriented design.

Let’s take a look at an example:

class Author {
    private $name;

    public function __construct($name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }

    public function getName() {
        return $this->name;
    }
}

abstract class Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return 'Johannes';
    }
}

class BlogPost extends Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return new Author('Johannes');
    }
}

class ForumPost extends Post { /* ... */ }

function my_function(Post $post) {
    echo strtoupper($post->getAuthor());
}

Our function my_function expects a Post object, and outputs the author of the post. The base class Post returns a simple string and outputting a simple string will work just fine. However, the child class BlogPost which is a sub-type of Post instead decided to return an object, and is therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a BlogPost were passed to my_function, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the strtoupper call in its body.

Loading history...
36
        }
37
38
        $q = new Promise();
39
        $reason = $this->reason;
40
41
        Context\ContextStack::create()->store(static function () use ($q, $reason, $onRejected) {
42
            if ($q->currentState() === self::STATE_PENDING) {
43
                try {
44
                    $q->resolve($onRejected($reason));
45
                } catch (\Throwable $e) {
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
The class Throwable does not exist. Did you forget a USE statement, or did you not list all dependencies?

Scrutinizer analyzes your composer.json/composer.lock file if available to determine the classes, and functions that are defined by your dependencies.

It seems like the listed class was neither found in your dependencies, nor was it found in the analyzed files in your repository. If you are using some other form of dependency management, you might want to disable this analysis.

Loading history...
46
                    $q->reject($e);
47
                } catch (\Exception $e) {
48
                    $q->reject($e);
49
                }
50
            }
51
        });
52
53
        Context\ContextStack::getQueueHandler()->run();
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
The method run cannot be called on \Gandung\Promise\Context...tack::getQueueHandler() (of type array).

Methods can only be called on objects. This check looks for methods being called on variables that have been inferred to never be objects.

Loading history...
54
55
        return $q;
56
    }
57
58
    /**
59
     * {@inheritdoc}
60
     */
61
    public function resolve($value)
62
    {
63
        throw new \LogicException(
64
            sprintf(
65
                "Cannot resolving a promise from context '%s'", __CLASS__
66
            )
67
        );
68
    }
69
70
    /**
71
     * {@inheritdoc}
72
     */
73
    public function reject($reason)
74
    {
75
        if ($reason !== $this->reason) {
76
            throw new \LogicException(
77
                sprintf(
78
                    "Supplied value does not strictly equal to current value." .
79
                    "Cannot reject promise from context '%s'", __CLASS__
80
                )
81
            );
82
        }
83
    }
84
85
    /**
86
     * {@inheritdoc}
87
     */
88
    public function currentState()
89
    {
90
        return self::STATE_REJECTED;
91
    }
92
}
93