Issues (32)

Security Analysis    no request data  

This project does not seem to handle request data directly as such no vulnerable execution paths were found.

  Cross-Site Scripting
Cross-Site Scripting enables an attacker to inject code into the response of a web-request that is viewed by other users. It can for example be used to bypass access controls, or even to take over other users' accounts.
  File Exposure
File Exposure allows an attacker to gain access to local files that he should not be able to access. These files can for example include database credentials, or other configuration files.
  File Manipulation
File Manipulation enables an attacker to write custom data to files. This potentially leads to injection of arbitrary code on the server.
  Object Injection
Object Injection enables an attacker to inject an object into PHP code, and can lead to arbitrary code execution, file exposure, or file manipulation attacks.
  Code Injection
Code Injection enables an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.
  Response Splitting
Response Splitting can be used to send arbitrary responses.
  File Inclusion
File Inclusion enables an attacker to inject custom files into PHP's file loading mechanism, either explicitly passed to include, or for example via PHP's auto-loading mechanism.
  Command Injection
Command Injection enables an attacker to inject a shell command that is execute with the privileges of the web-server. This can be used to expose sensitive data, or gain access of your server.
  SQL Injection
SQL Injection enables an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL code on your database server gaining access to user data, or manipulating user data.
  XPath Injection
XPath Injection enables an attacker to modify the parts of XML document that are read. If that XML document is for example used for authentication, this can lead to further vulnerabilities similar to SQL Injection.
  LDAP Injection
LDAP Injection enables an attacker to inject LDAP statements potentially granting permission to run unauthorized queries, or modify content inside the LDAP tree.
  Header Injection
  Other Vulnerability
This category comprises other attack vectors such as manipulating the PHP runtime, loading custom extensions, freezing the runtime, or similar.
  Regex Injection
Regex Injection enables an attacker to execute arbitrary code in your PHP process.
  XML Injection
XML Injection enables an attacker to read files on your local filesystem including configuration files, or can be abused to freeze your web-server process.
  Variable Injection
Variable Injection enables an attacker to overwrite program variables with custom data, and can lead to further vulnerabilities.
Unfortunately, the security analysis is currently not available for your project. If you are a non-commercial open-source project, please contact support to gain access.

src/Model/Message.php (5 issues)

Upgrade to new PHP Analysis Engine

These results are based on our legacy PHP analysis, consider migrating to our new PHP analysis engine instead. Learn more

1
<?php
2
3
/*
4
 * This file is part of the PHP Translation package.
5
 *
6
 * (c) PHP Translation team <[email protected]>
7
 *
8
 * For the full copyright and license information, please view the LICENSE
9
 * file that was distributed with this source code.
10
 */
11
12
namespace Translation\Common\Model;
13
14
final class Message implements MessageInterface
15
{
16
    /**
17
     * @var string
18
     *
19
     * The domain the message belongs to
20
     */
21
    private $domain;
22
23
    /**
24
     * @var string
25
     *
26
     * The key/phrase you write in the source code
27
     */
28
    private $key;
29
30
    /**
31
     * @var string
32
     *
33
     * The locale the translations is on
34
     */
35
    private $locale;
36
37
    /**
38
     * @var string
39
     *
40
     * The translated string. This is the preview of the message. Ie no placeholders is visible.
41
     */
42
    private $translation;
43
44
    /**
45
     * Key value array with metadata.
46
     *
47
     * @var array
48
     */
49
    private $meta = [];
50
51 11
    public function __construct(string $key, string $domain = '', string $locale = '', string $translation = '', array $meta = [])
52
    {
53 11
        $this->key = $key;
54 11
        $this->domain = $domain;
55 11
        $this->locale = $locale;
56 11
        $this->translation = $translation;
57 11
        $this->meta = $meta;
58 11
    }
59
60
    /**
61
     * {@inheritdoc}
62
     */
63 5
    public function getDomain(): string
64
    {
65 5
        return $this->domain;
66
    }
67
68
    /**
69
     * {@inheritdoc}
70
     */
71 2
    public function withDomain(string $domain): MessageInterface
72
    {
73 2
        $new = clone $this;
74 2
        $new->domain = $domain;
75
76 2
        return $new;
0 ignored issues
show
Bug Best Practice introduced by
The return type of return $new; (Translation\Common\Model\Message) is incompatible with the return type declared by the interface Translation\Common\Model...geInterface::withDomain of type self.

If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method. This is more formally defined by the Lizkov substitution principle, and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the SOLID principles for object oriented design.

Let’s take a look at an example:

class Author {
    private $name;

    public function __construct($name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }

    public function getName() {
        return $this->name;
    }
}

abstract class Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return 'Johannes';
    }
}

class BlogPost extends Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return new Author('Johannes');
    }
}

class ForumPost extends Post { /* ... */ }

function my_function(Post $post) {
    echo strtoupper($post->getAuthor());
}

Our function my_function expects a Post object, and outputs the author of the post. The base class Post returns a simple string and outputting a simple string will work just fine. However, the child class BlogPost which is a sub-type of Post instead decided to return an object, and is therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a BlogPost were passed to my_function, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the strtoupper call in its body.

Loading history...
77
    }
78
79
    /**
80
     * {@inheritdoc}
81
     */
82 5
    public function getKey(): string
83
    {
84 5
        return $this->key;
85
    }
86
87
    /**
88
     * {@inheritdoc}
89
     */
90 5
    public function getLocale(): string
91
    {
92 5
        return $this->locale;
93
    }
94
95
    /**
96
     * {@inheritdoc}
97
     */
98 2
    public function withLocale(string $locale): MessageInterface
99
    {
100 2
        $new = clone $this;
101 2
        $new->locale = $locale;
102
103 2
        return $new;
0 ignored issues
show
Bug Best Practice introduced by
The return type of return $new; (Translation\Common\Model\Message) is incompatible with the return type declared by the interface Translation\Common\Model...geInterface::withLocale of type self.

If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method. This is more formally defined by the Lizkov substitution principle, and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the SOLID principles for object oriented design.

Let’s take a look at an example:

class Author {
    private $name;

    public function __construct($name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }

    public function getName() {
        return $this->name;
    }
}

abstract class Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return 'Johannes';
    }
}

class BlogPost extends Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return new Author('Johannes');
    }
}

class ForumPost extends Post { /* ... */ }

function my_function(Post $post) {
    echo strtoupper($post->getAuthor());
}

Our function my_function expects a Post object, and outputs the author of the post. The base class Post returns a simple string and outputting a simple string will work just fine. However, the child class BlogPost which is a sub-type of Post instead decided to return an object, and is therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a BlogPost were passed to my_function, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the strtoupper call in its body.

Loading history...
104
    }
105
106
    /**
107
     * {@inheritdoc}
108
     */
109 6
    public function getTranslation(): string
110
    {
111 6
        return $this->translation;
112
    }
113
114
    /**
115
     * {@inheritdoc}
116
     */
117 2
    public function withTranslation(string $translation): MessageInterface
118
    {
119 2
        $new = clone $this;
120 2
        $new->translation = $translation;
121
122 2
        return $new;
0 ignored issues
show
Bug Best Practice introduced by
The return type of return $new; (Translation\Common\Model\Message) is incompatible with the return type declared by the interface Translation\Common\Model...erface::withTranslation of type self.

If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method. This is more formally defined by the Lizkov substitution principle, and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the SOLID principles for object oriented design.

Let’s take a look at an example:

class Author {
    private $name;

    public function __construct($name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }

    public function getName() {
        return $this->name;
    }
}

abstract class Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return 'Johannes';
    }
}

class BlogPost extends Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return new Author('Johannes');
    }
}

class ForumPost extends Post { /* ... */ }

function my_function(Post $post) {
    echo strtoupper($post->getAuthor());
}

Our function my_function expects a Post object, and outputs the author of the post. The base class Post returns a simple string and outputting a simple string will work just fine. However, the child class BlogPost which is a sub-type of Post instead decided to return an object, and is therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a BlogPost were passed to my_function, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the strtoupper call in its body.

Loading history...
123
    }
124
125
    /**
126
     * {@inheritdoc}
127
     */
128 2
    public function getAllMeta(): array
129
    {
130 2
        return $this->meta;
131
    }
132
133
    /**
134
     * {@inheritdoc}
135
     */
136 2
    public function withMeta(array $meta): MessageInterface
137
    {
138 2
        $new = clone $this;
139 2
        $new->meta = $meta;
140
141 2
        return $new;
0 ignored issues
show
Bug Best Practice introduced by
The return type of return $new; (Translation\Common\Model\Message) is incompatible with the return type declared by the interface Translation\Common\Model...sageInterface::withMeta of type self.

If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method. This is more formally defined by the Lizkov substitution principle, and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the SOLID principles for object oriented design.

Let’s take a look at an example:

class Author {
    private $name;

    public function __construct($name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }

    public function getName() {
        return $this->name;
    }
}

abstract class Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return 'Johannes';
    }
}

class BlogPost extends Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return new Author('Johannes');
    }
}

class ForumPost extends Post { /* ... */ }

function my_function(Post $post) {
    echo strtoupper($post->getAuthor());
}

Our function my_function expects a Post object, and outputs the author of the post. The base class Post returns a simple string and outputting a simple string will work just fine. However, the child class BlogPost which is a sub-type of Post instead decided to return an object, and is therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a BlogPost were passed to my_function, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the strtoupper call in its body.

Loading history...
142
    }
143
144
    /**
145
     * {@inheritdoc}
146
     */
147 2
    public function withAddedMeta(string $key, string $value): MessageInterface
148
    {
149 2
        $new = clone $this;
150 2
        $new->meta[$key] = $value;
151
152 2
        return $new;
0 ignored issues
show
Bug Best Practice introduced by
The return type of return $new; (Translation\Common\Model\Message) is incompatible with the return type declared by the interface Translation\Common\Model...nterface::withAddedMeta of type self.

If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method. This is more formally defined by the Lizkov substitution principle, and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the SOLID principles for object oriented design.

Let’s take a look at an example:

class Author {
    private $name;

    public function __construct($name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }

    public function getName() {
        return $this->name;
    }
}

abstract class Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return 'Johannes';
    }
}

class BlogPost extends Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return new Author('Johannes');
    }
}

class ForumPost extends Post { /* ... */ }

function my_function(Post $post) {
    echo strtoupper($post->getAuthor());
}

Our function my_function expects a Post object, and outputs the author of the post. The base class Post returns a simple string and outputting a simple string will work just fine. However, the child class BlogPost which is a sub-type of Post instead decided to return an object, and is therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a BlogPost were passed to my_function, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the strtoupper call in its body.

Loading history...
153
    }
154
155
    /**
156
     * {@inheritdoc}
157
     */
158 1
    public function getMeta(string $key, $default = null)
159
    {
160 1
        if (\array_key_exists($key, $this->meta)) {
161 1
            return $this->meta[$key];
162
        }
163
164 1
        return $default;
165
    }
166
}
167