This project does not seem to handle request data directly as such no vulnerable execution paths were found.
include
, or for example
via PHP's auto-loading mechanism.
These results are based on our legacy PHP analysis, consider migrating to our new PHP analysis engine instead. Learn more
1 | <?php |
||
2 | |||
3 | namespace LeverTest\Api; |
||
4 | |||
5 | use GuzzleHttp\Client as HttpClient; |
||
6 | use Lever\Api\Client; |
||
7 | use PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase; |
||
8 | use Psr\Http\Message\ResponseInterface; |
||
9 | |||
10 | /** |
||
11 | * LeverTest\Api\ClientTest |
||
12 | */ |
||
13 | class ClientTest extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase |
||
14 | { |
||
15 | /** @var Client */ |
||
16 | protected $client; |
||
17 | |||
18 | /** @var HttpClient | \Prophecy\Prophecy\ObjectProphecy */ |
||
19 | protected $mockClient; |
||
20 | |||
21 | public function setUp() |
||
22 | { |
||
23 | $this->client = new Client( |
||
24 | [ |
||
25 | 'authToken' => 'myToken', |
||
26 | 'httpClient' => $this->mockClient()->reveal(), |
||
27 | ] |
||
28 | ); |
||
29 | } |
||
30 | |||
31 | /** |
||
32 | * @test |
||
33 | */ |
||
34 | public function hasDefaultEndpoint() |
||
35 | { |
||
36 | $this->assertEquals('https://api.lever.co/v1', $this->client->getEndpoint()); |
||
37 | } |
||
38 | |||
39 | /** |
||
40 | * @test |
||
41 | */ |
||
42 | public function canMutateEndpoint() |
||
43 | { |
||
44 | $this->client = new Client(['endpoint' => 'https://test.lever.co/v2/']); |
||
45 | $this->assertEquals('https://test.lever.co/v2', $this->client->getEndpoint()); |
||
46 | } |
||
47 | |||
48 | /** |
||
49 | * @test |
||
50 | */ |
||
51 | View Code Duplication | public function canMakeGetRequests() |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
52 | { |
||
53 | $query = ['foo' => 'bar']; |
||
54 | |||
55 | $this->mockClient()->request( |
||
56 | 'GET', |
||
57 | $this->url('/foo'), |
||
58 | [ |
||
59 | 'auth' => ['myToken', ''], |
||
60 | 'query' => $query, |
||
61 | ] |
||
62 | )->willReturn($this->fooBarResponse()); |
||
63 | |||
64 | $data = $this->client->get('/foo', $query); |
||
65 | |||
66 | $this->assertFooBarResponse($data); |
||
67 | } |
||
68 | |||
69 | /** |
||
70 | * @test |
||
71 | */ |
||
72 | View Code Duplication | public function canMakePostRequests() |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
73 | { |
||
74 | $postData = ['foo' => 'bar']; |
||
75 | |||
76 | $this->mockClient()->request( |
||
77 | 'POST', |
||
78 | $this->url('/foo'), |
||
79 | [ |
||
80 | 'auth' => ['myToken', ''], |
||
81 | 'form_params' => $postData, |
||
82 | ] |
||
83 | )->willReturn($this->fooBarResponse()); |
||
84 | |||
85 | $data = $this->client->post('/foo', $postData); |
||
86 | |||
87 | $this->assertFooBarResponse($data); |
||
88 | } |
||
89 | |||
90 | /** |
||
91 | * @test |
||
92 | */ |
||
93 | View Code Duplication | public function canMakePutRequest() |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
94 | { |
||
95 | $putData = ['foo' => 'bar']; |
||
96 | |||
97 | $this->mockClient()->request( |
||
98 | 'PUT', |
||
99 | $this->url('/foo'), |
||
100 | [ |
||
101 | 'auth' => ['myToken', ''], |
||
102 | 'json' => $putData, |
||
103 | ] |
||
104 | )->willReturn($this->fooBarResponse()); |
||
105 | |||
106 | $data = $this->client->put('/foo', $putData); |
||
107 | |||
108 | $this->assertFooBarResponse($data); |
||
109 | } |
||
110 | |||
111 | /** |
||
112 | * @return \Prophecy\Prophecy\ObjectProphecy |
||
113 | */ |
||
114 | private function mockClient() |
||
115 | { |
||
116 | if ($this->mockClient === null) { |
||
117 | $this->mockClient = $this->prophesize(HttpClient::class); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
It seems like
$this->prophesize(\GuzzleHttp\Client::class) of type object<Prophecy\Prophecy\ObjectProphecy> is incompatible with the declared type object<GuzzleHttp\Client> of property $mockClient .
Our type inference engine has found an assignment to a property that is incompatible with the declared type of that property. Either this assignment is in error or the assigned type should be added to the documentation/type hint for that property.. ![]() |
|||
118 | } |
||
119 | |||
120 | return $this->mockClient; |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The expression
$this->mockClient; of type Prophecy\Prophecy\ObjectProphecy|GuzzleHttp\Client adds the type GuzzleHttp\Client to the return on line 120 which is incompatible with the return type documented by LeverTest\Api\ClientTest::mockClient of type Prophecy\Prophecy\ObjectProphecy .
![]() |
|||
121 | } |
||
122 | |||
123 | /** |
||
124 | * @param string $path |
||
125 | * |
||
126 | * @return string |
||
127 | */ |
||
128 | private function url($path = '/') |
||
129 | { |
||
130 | return 'https://api.lever.co/v1' . $path; |
||
131 | } |
||
132 | |||
133 | private function fooBarResponse() |
||
134 | { |
||
135 | $response = $this->prophesize(ResponseInterface::class); |
||
136 | $response->getBody()->willReturn('{"foo":"bar"}'); |
||
137 | |||
138 | return $response->reveal(); |
||
139 | } |
||
140 | |||
141 | /** |
||
142 | * @param array $data |
||
143 | */ |
||
144 | private function assertFooBarResponse($data) |
||
145 | { |
||
146 | $this->assertEquals(['foo' => 'bar'], $data); |
||
147 | } |
||
148 | } |
||
149 |
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation.
You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository.