Passed
Push — master ( b847d6...d6d54c )
by Michael
09:34 queued 05:00
created

TreeHandler::__construct()   A

Complexity

Conditions 1
Paths 1

Size

Total Lines 3
Code Lines 1

Duplication

Lines 0
Ratio 0 %

Importance

Changes 2
Bugs 0 Features 0
Metric Value
cc 1
eloc 1
c 2
b 0
f 0
nc 1
nop 1
dl 0
loc 3
rs 10
1
<?php namespace XoopsModules\Pedigree;
0 ignored issues
show
Coding Style Compatibility introduced by
For compatibility and reusability of your code, PSR1 recommends that a file should introduce either new symbols (like classes, functions, etc.) or have side-effects (like outputting something, or including other files), but not both at the same time. The first symbol is defined on line 28 and the first side effect is on line 23.

The PSR-1: Basic Coding Standard recommends that a file should either introduce new symbols, that is classes, functions, constants or similar, or have side effects. Side effects are anything that executes logic, like for example printing output, changing ini settings or writing to a file.

The idea behind this recommendation is that merely auto-loading a class should not change the state of an application. It also promotes a cleaner style of programming and makes your code less prone to errors, because the logic is not spread out all over the place.

To learn more about the PSR-1, please see the PHP-FIG site on the PSR-1.

Loading history...
2
/*
3
 You may not change or alter any portion of this comment or credits
4
 of supporting developers from this source code or any supporting source code
5
 which is considered copyrighted (c) material of the original comment or credit authors.
6
7
 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
8
 but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
9
 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
10
*/
11
/**
12
 * Pedigree module for XOOPS
13
 *
14
 * @copyright       {@link http://sourceforge.net/projects/xoops/ The XOOPS Project}
15
 * @license         GPL 2.0 or later
16
 * @package         pedigree
17
 * @since           2.5.x
18
 * @author          XOOPS Module Dev Team (https://xoops.org)
19
 */
20
21
use XoopsModules\Pedigree;
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
This use statement conflicts with another class in this namespace, XoopsModules\Pedigree\Pedigree. Consider defining an alias.

Let?s assume that you have a directory layout like this:

.
|-- OtherDir
|   |-- Bar.php
|   `-- Foo.php
`-- SomeDir
    `-- Foo.php

and let?s assume the following content of Bar.php:

// Bar.php
namespace OtherDir;

use SomeDir\Foo; // This now conflicts the class OtherDir\Foo

If both files OtherDir/Foo.php and SomeDir/Foo.php are loaded in the same runtime, you will see a PHP error such as the following:

PHP Fatal error:  Cannot use SomeDir\Foo as Foo because the name is already in use in OtherDir/Foo.php

However, as OtherDir/Foo.php does not necessarily have to be loaded and the error is only triggered if it is loaded before OtherDir/Bar.php, this problem might go unnoticed for a while. In order to prevent this error from surfacing, you must import the namespace with a different alias:

// Bar.php
namespace OtherDir;

use SomeDir\Foo as SomeDirFoo; // There is no conflict anymore.
Loading history...
22
23
defined('XOOPS_ROOT_PATH') || die('Restricted access');
24
25
/**
26
 * Class Pedigree\TreeHandler
27
 */
28
class TreeHandler extends \XoopsPersistableObjectHandler
29
{
30
    /**
31
     * @param null|object|\XoopsDatabase $db
32
     */
33
    public function __construct(\XoopsDatabase $db)
34
    {
35
        parent::__construct($db, 'pedigree_tree', Tree::class, 'id', 'naam');
36
    }
37
38
    /**
39
     * Get criteria for active animals
40
     *
41
     * @param null $roft
0 ignored issues
show
Documentation Bug introduced by
Are you sure the doc-type for parameter $roft is correct as it would always require null to be passed?
Loading history...
42
     * @return \CriteriaCompo
43
     */
44
    public function getActiveCriteria($roft = null)
45
    {
46
        $grouppermHandler = xoops_getHandler('groupperm');
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code introduced by
The assignment to $grouppermHandler is dead and can be removed.
Loading history...
47
48
        //        $criteria = new \CriteriaCompo(new \Criteria('offline', false));
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
60% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
49
        //        $criteria->add(new \Criteria('published', 0, '>'));
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
69% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
50
        //        $criteria->add(new \Criteria('published', time(), '<='));
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
69% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
51
        //        $expiredCriteria = new \CriteriaCompo(new \Criteria('expired', 0));
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
58% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
52
        //        $expiredCriteria->add(new \Criteria('expired', time(), '>='), 'OR');
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
68% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
53
        //        $criteria->add($expiredCriteria);
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
75% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
54
55
        // add criteria for categories that the user has permissions for
56
        //        $groups                   = is_object($GLOBALS['xoopsUser']) ? $GLOBALS['xoopsUser']->getGroups() : array(0 => XOOPS_GROUP_ANONYMOUS);
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
62% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
57
        //mb        $allowedDownCategoriesIds = $grouppermHandler->getItemIds('WFDownCatPerm', $groups, $this->wfdownloads->getModule()->mid());
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
63% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
58
        //mb        $criteria->add(new \Criteria('cid', '(' . implode(',', $allowedDownCategoriesIds) . ')', 'IN'));
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
58% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
59
60
        $criteria = new \CriteriaCompo();
61
        if (null !== $roft) {
0 ignored issues
show
introduced by
The condition null !== $roft is always false.
Loading history...
62
            $criteria->add(new \Criteria('roft', $roft));
63
        }
64
        $criteria->setSort('naam ASC');
65
        $criteria->setOrder('ASC');
66
67
        return $criteria;
68
    }
69
}
70