59% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have
checked you do not need it.
The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that
someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.
This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.
The method user() does not seem to exist on object<Illuminate\Contracts\Auth\Factory>.
This check looks for calls to methods that do not seem to exist on a given type.
It looks for the method on the type itself as well as in inherited classes or
implemented interfaces.
This is most likely a typographical error or the method has been renamed.
The method share does only exist in Illuminate\Contracts\View\Factory, but not in Illuminate\View\View.
It seems like the method you are trying to call exists only in some of the
possible types.
Let’s take a look at an example:
classA{publicfunctionfoo(){}}classBextendsA{publicfunctionbar(){}}/** * @param A|B $x */functionsomeFunction($x){$x->foo();// This call is fine as the method exists in A and B.$x->bar();// This method only exists in B and might cause an error.}
librenms /
librenmsv2
Loading history...
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.
The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.
This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.