This project does not seem to handle request data directly as such no vulnerable execution paths were found.
include
, or for example
via PHP's auto-loading mechanism.
These results are based on our legacy PHP analysis, consider migrating to our new PHP analysis engine instead. Learn more
1 | <?php |
||
2 | |||
3 | namespace App\Itil\Controllers; |
||
4 | |||
5 | use App\Itil\Controllers\BaseServiceDeskController; |
||
6 | use App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChanges; |
||
7 | use App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChangestatus; |
||
8 | use App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChangepriorities; |
||
9 | use App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChangetypes; |
||
10 | use App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdImpacttypes; |
||
11 | use App\Itil\Models\Releases\SdLocations; |
||
12 | use App\Itil\Requests\CreateChangesRequest; |
||
13 | use App\User; |
||
14 | use App\Itil\Models\Common\Cab; |
||
15 | use Exception; |
||
16 | use App\Itil\Requests\CreateReleaseRequest; |
||
17 | use Illuminate\Http\Request; |
||
18 | |||
19 | class ChangesController extends BaseServiceDeskController { |
||
20 | |||
21 | public function __construct() { |
||
22 | $this->middleware('auth'); |
||
23 | } |
||
24 | |||
25 | public function changesindex() { |
||
26 | try { |
||
27 | return view('itil::changes.index'); |
||
28 | } catch (Exception $ex) { |
||
29 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
30 | } |
||
31 | } |
||
32 | |||
33 | View Code Duplication | public function getChanges() { |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
34 | try { |
||
35 | $change = new SdChanges(); |
||
36 | $changes = $change->select('id', 'description', 'subject', 'status_id', 'priority_id', 'change_type_id', 'impact_id', 'location_id', 'approval_id')->get(); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The method
select does not exist on object<App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChanges> ? Since you implemented __call , maybe consider adding a @method annotation.
If you implement This is often the case, when class ParentClass {
private $data = array();
public function __call($method, array $args) {
if (0 === strpos($method, 'get')) {
return $this->data[strtolower(substr($method, 3))];
}
throw new \LogicException(sprintf('Unsupported method: %s', $method));
}
}
/**
* If this class knows which fields exist, you can specify the methods here:
*
* @method string getName()
*/
class SomeClass extends ParentClass { }
![]() |
|||
37 | return \Datatable::Collection($changes) |
||
38 | ->showColumns('subject', 'reason') |
||
39 | ->addColumn('action', function($model) { |
||
40 | $url = url('service-desk/changes/' . $model->id . '/delete'); |
||
41 | $delete = \App\Itil\Controllers\UtilityController::deletePopUp($model->id, $url, "Delete $model->subject"); |
||
42 | //dd($delete); |
||
43 | return "<a href=" . url('service-desk/changes/' . $model->id . '/edit') . " class='btn btn-info btn-sm'>Edit</a> " |
||
44 | . $delete |
||
45 | . " <a href=" . url('service-desk/changes/' . $model->id . '/show') . " class='btn btn-primary btn-sm'>View</a>"; |
||
46 | }) |
||
47 | ->searchColumns('description') |
||
48 | ->orderColumns('description', 'subject', 'reason', 'status_id', 'priority_id', 'change_type_id', 'impact_id', 'location_id', 'approval_id') |
||
49 | ->make(); |
||
50 | } catch (Exception $ex) { |
||
51 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
52 | } |
||
53 | } |
||
54 | |||
55 | public function changescreate() { |
||
56 | try { |
||
57 | $statuses = SdChangestatus::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
58 | $sd_changes_priorities = SdChangepriorities::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
59 | $sd_changes_types = SdChangetypes::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
60 | $sd_impact_types = SdImpacttypes::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
61 | $sd_locations = SdLocations::lists('title', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
62 | $users = Cab::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
63 | // $assets = SdAssets::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
58% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
64 | $requester = User::where('role', 'agent')->orWhere('role', 'admin')->lists('email', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
65 | |||
66 | return view('itil::changes.create', compact('statuses', 'sd_changes_priorities', 'sd_changes_types', 'sd_impact_types', 'sd_locations', 'users', 'requester')); |
||
67 | } catch (Exception $ex) { |
||
68 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
69 | } |
||
70 | } |
||
71 | |||
72 | public function changeshandleCreate(CreateChangesRequest $request, $attach = false) { |
||
73 | // dd($request->all()); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
70% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
74 | try { |
||
75 | $sd_changes = new SdChanges; |
||
76 | $sd_changes->fill($request->input())->save(); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
It seems like
$request->input() targeting Illuminate\Http\Request::input() can also be of type string ; however, Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model::fill() does only seem to accept array , maybe add an additional type check?
This check looks at variables that are passed out again to other methods. If the outgoing method call has stricter type requirements than the method itself, an issue is raised. An additional type check may prevent trouble. ![]() |
|||
77 | \App\Itil\Controllers\UtilityController::attachment($sd_changes->id, 'sd_changes', $request->file('attachments')); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The property
id does not exist on object<App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChanges> . Since you implemented __get , maybe consider adding a @property annotation.
Since your code implements the magic getter <?php
/**
* @property int $x
* @property int $y
* @property string $text
*/
class MyLabel
{
private $properties;
private $allowedProperties = array('x', 'y', 'text');
public function __get($name)
{
if (isset($properties[$name]) && in_array($name, $this->allowedProperties)) {
return $properties[$name];
} else {
return null;
}
}
public function __set($name, $value)
{
if (in_array($name, $this->allowedProperties)) {
$properties[$name] = $value;
} else {
throw new \LogicException("Property $name is not defined.");
}
}
}
If the property has read access only, you can use the @property-read annotation instead. Of course, you may also just have mistyped another name, in which case you should fix the error. See also the PhpDoc documentation for @property. ![]() |
|||
78 | if (isAsset() == true) { |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
79 | \App\Itil\Controllers\UtilityController::storeAssetRelation('sd_changes', $sd_changes->id, $request->input('asset')); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The property
id does not exist on object<App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChanges> . Since you implemented __get , maybe consider adding a @property annotation.
Since your code implements the magic getter <?php
/**
* @property int $x
* @property int $y
* @property string $text
*/
class MyLabel
{
private $properties;
private $allowedProperties = array('x', 'y', 'text');
public function __get($name)
{
if (isset($properties[$name]) && in_array($name, $this->allowedProperties)) {
return $properties[$name];
} else {
return null;
}
}
public function __set($name, $value)
{
if (in_array($name, $this->allowedProperties)) {
$properties[$name] = $value;
} else {
throw new \LogicException("Property $name is not defined.");
}
}
}
If the property has read access only, you can use the @property-read annotation instead. Of course, you may also just have mistyped another name, in which case you should fix the error. See also the PhpDoc documentation for @property. ![]() It seems like
$request->input('asset') targeting Illuminate\Http\Request::input() can also be of type string ; however, App\Itil\Controllers\Uti...r::storeAssetRelation() does only seem to accept array , maybe add an additional type check?
This check looks at variables that are passed out again to other methods. If the outgoing method call has stricter type requirements than the method itself, an issue is raised. An additional type check may prevent trouble. ![]() |
|||
80 | } |
||
81 | if ($attach == false) { |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
82 | return \Redirect::route('service-desk.changes.index')->with('message', 'Changes successfull !!!'); |
||
83 | } |
||
84 | return $sd_changes; |
||
85 | } catch (Exception $ex) { |
||
86 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
87 | } |
||
88 | } |
||
89 | |||
90 | public function changesedit($id) { |
||
91 | try { |
||
92 | |||
93 | $change = SdChanges::findOrFail($id); |
||
94 | $statuses = SdChangestatus::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
95 | $sd_changes_status = ""; |
||
96 | $sd_changes_priorities = SdChangepriorities::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
97 | $sd_changes_types = SdChangetypes::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
98 | $sd_impact_types = SdImpacttypes::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
99 | $sd_locations = SdLocations::lists('title', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
100 | $users = Cab::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
101 | // $assets = SdAssets::lists('name', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
58% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
102 | $requester = User::where('role', 'agent')->orWhere('role', 'admin')->lists('email', 'id')->toArray(); |
||
103 | return view('itil::changes.edit', compact('sd_changes_status', 'change', 'statuses', 'sd_changes_priorities', 'sd_changes_types', 'sd_impact_types', 'sd_locations', 'users', 'requester')); |
||
104 | } catch (Exception $ex) { |
||
105 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
106 | } |
||
107 | } |
||
108 | |||
109 | public function changeshandleEdit($id, CreateChangesRequest $request) { |
||
110 | try { |
||
111 | |||
112 | $sd_changes = SdChanges::findOrFail($id); |
||
113 | $sd_changes->fill($request->input())->save(); |
||
114 | \App\Itil\Controllers\UtilityController::attachment($sd_changes->id, 'sd_changes', $request->file('attachments')); |
||
115 | if (isAsset() == true) { |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
116 | \App\Itil\Controllers\UtilityController::storeAssetRelation('sd_changes', $sd_changes->id, $request->input('asset')); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
It seems like
$request->input('asset') targeting Illuminate\Http\Request::input() can also be of type string ; however, App\Itil\Controllers\Uti...r::storeAssetRelation() does only seem to accept array , maybe add an additional type check?
This check looks at variables that are passed out again to other methods. If the outgoing method call has stricter type requirements than the method itself, an issue is raised. An additional type check may prevent trouble. ![]() |
|||
117 | } |
||
118 | return \Redirect::route('service-desk.changes.index')->with('message', 'Changes successfully Edit !!!'); |
||
119 | } catch (Exception $ex) { |
||
120 | dd($ex); |
||
121 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
122 | } |
||
123 | } |
||
124 | |||
125 | public function changesHandledelete($id) { |
||
126 | try { |
||
127 | $sd_changes = SdChanges::findOrFail($id); |
||
128 | $sd_changes->delete(); |
||
129 | return \Redirect::route('service-desk.changes.index')->with('message', 'Changes successfully Delete !!!'); |
||
130 | } catch (Exception $ex) { |
||
131 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
132 | } |
||
133 | } |
||
134 | |||
135 | View Code Duplication | public function show($id) { |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
136 | try { |
||
137 | $changes = new SdChanges(); |
||
138 | $change = $changes->find($id); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The method
find does not exist on object<App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChanges> ? Since you implemented __call , maybe consider adding a @method annotation.
If you implement This is often the case, when class ParentClass {
private $data = array();
public function __call($method, array $args) {
if (0 === strpos($method, 'get')) {
return $this->data[strtolower(substr($method, 3))];
}
throw new \LogicException(sprintf('Unsupported method: %s', $method));
}
}
/**
* If this class knows which fields exist, you can specify the methods here:
*
* @method string getName()
*/
class SomeClass extends ParentClass { }
![]() |
|||
139 | if ($change) { |
||
140 | return view('itil::changes.show', compact('change')); |
||
141 | } else { |
||
142 | throw new \Exception('Sorry we can not find your request'); |
||
143 | } |
||
144 | } catch (Exception $ex) { |
||
145 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
146 | } |
||
147 | } |
||
148 | |||
149 | public function close($id) { |
||
150 | try { |
||
151 | $changes = new SdChanges(); |
||
152 | $change = $changes->find($id); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The method
find does not exist on object<App\Itil\Models\Changes\SdChanges> ? Since you implemented __call , maybe consider adding a @method annotation.
If you implement This is often the case, when class ParentClass {
private $data = array();
public function __call($method, array $args) {
if (0 === strpos($method, 'get')) {
return $this->data[strtolower(substr($method, 3))];
}
throw new \LogicException(sprintf('Unsupported method: %s', $method));
}
}
/**
* If this class knows which fields exist, you can specify the methods here:
*
* @method string getName()
*/
class SomeClass extends ParentClass { }
![]() |
|||
153 | if ($change) { |
||
154 | $change->status_id = 6; |
||
155 | $change->save(); |
||
156 | return redirect()->back()->with('success', 'Updated'); |
||
157 | } else { |
||
158 | throw new \Exception('Sorry we can not find your request'); |
||
159 | } |
||
160 | } catch (\Exception $ex) { |
||
161 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
162 | } |
||
163 | } |
||
164 | |||
165 | View Code Duplication | public function getReleases() { |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
166 | $release = new \App\Itil\Models\Releases\SdReleases(); |
||
167 | $releases = $release->select('id', 'subject')->get(); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The method
select does not exist on object<App\Itil\Models\Releases\SdReleases> ? Since you implemented __call , maybe consider adding a @method annotation.
If you implement This is often the case, when class ParentClass {
private $data = array();
public function __call($method, array $args) {
if (0 === strpos($method, 'get')) {
return $this->data[strtolower(substr($method, 3))];
}
throw new \LogicException(sprintf('Unsupported method: %s', $method));
}
}
/**
* If this class knows which fields exist, you can specify the methods here:
*
* @method string getName()
*/
class SomeClass extends ParentClass { }
![]() |
|||
168 | return \Datatable::Collection($releases) |
||
169 | ->addColumn('id', function($model) { |
||
170 | return "<input type='radio' name='release' value='" . $model->id . "'>"; |
||
171 | }) |
||
172 | ->addColumn('subject', function($model) { |
||
173 | return str_limit($model->subject, 20); |
||
174 | }) |
||
175 | ->orderColumns('subject') |
||
176 | ->searchColumns('subject') |
||
177 | ->make(); |
||
178 | } |
||
179 | |||
180 | View Code Duplication | public function attachNewRelease($id, CreateReleaseRequest $request) { |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
181 | try { |
||
182 | $release_controller = new RelesesController(); |
||
183 | $release = $release_controller->releaseshandleCreate($request, true); |
||
184 | $this->releaseAttach($id, $release->id); |
||
185 | if ($release) { |
||
186 | return redirect()->back()->with('success', 'Updated'); |
||
187 | } |
||
188 | } catch (\Exception $ex) { |
||
189 | dd($ex); |
||
190 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
191 | } |
||
192 | } |
||
193 | |||
194 | public function attachExistingRelease($id, Request $request) { |
||
195 | try { |
||
196 | $releaseid = $request->input('release'); |
||
197 | $store = $this->releaseAttach($id, $releaseid); |
||
198 | if ($store) { |
||
199 | return redirect()->back()->with('success', 'Updated'); |
||
200 | } |
||
201 | } catch (\Exception $ex) { |
||
202 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
203 | } |
||
204 | } |
||
205 | |||
206 | View Code Duplication | public function releaseAttach($changeid, $releaseid) { |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
207 | $relation = new \App\Itil\Models\Changes\ChangeReleaseRelation(); |
||
208 | $relations = $relation->where('change_id', $changeid)->first(); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The method
where does not exist on object<App\Itil\Models\C...\ChangeReleaseRelation> ? Since you implemented __call , maybe consider adding a @method annotation.
If you implement This is often the case, when class ParentClass {
private $data = array();
public function __call($method, array $args) {
if (0 === strpos($method, 'get')) {
return $this->data[strtolower(substr($method, 3))];
}
throw new \LogicException(sprintf('Unsupported method: %s', $method));
}
}
/**
* If this class knows which fields exist, you can specify the methods here:
*
* @method string getName()
*/
class SomeClass extends ParentClass { }
![]() |
|||
209 | if ($relations) { |
||
210 | $relations->delete(); |
||
211 | } |
||
212 | |||
213 | return $relation->create([ |
||
214 | 'release_id' => $releaseid, |
||
215 | 'change_id' => $changeid, |
||
216 | ]); |
||
217 | } |
||
218 | |||
219 | View Code Duplication | public function detachRelease($changeid) { |
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
This method seems to be duplicated in your project.
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. ![]() |
|||
220 | try { |
||
221 | $relations = new \App\Itil\Models\Changes\ChangeReleaseRelation(); |
||
222 | $relation = $relations->where('change_id', $changeid)->first(); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
The method
where does not exist on object<App\Itil\Models\C...\ChangeReleaseRelation> ? Since you implemented __call , maybe consider adding a @method annotation.
If you implement This is often the case, when class ParentClass {
private $data = array();
public function __call($method, array $args) {
if (0 === strpos($method, 'get')) {
return $this->data[strtolower(substr($method, 3))];
}
throw new \LogicException(sprintf('Unsupported method: %s', $method));
}
}
/**
* If this class knows which fields exist, you can specify the methods here:
*
* @method string getName()
*/
class SomeClass extends ParentClass { }
![]() |
|||
223 | if ($relation) { |
||
224 | $relation->delete(); |
||
225 | } |
||
226 | return redirect()->back()->with('success', 'Updated'); |
||
227 | } catch (\Exception $ex) { |
||
228 | return redirect()->back()->with('fails', $ex->getMessage()); |
||
229 | } |
||
230 | } |
||
231 | |||
232 | } |
||
233 |
Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation.
You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository.