This project does not seem to handle request data directly as such no vulnerable execution paths were found.
include
, or for example
via PHP's auto-loading mechanism.
These results are based on our legacy PHP analysis, consider migrating to our new PHP analysis engine instead. Learn more
1 | <?php |
||
2 | |||
3 | use einfach\operation\Railway; |
||
4 | use einfach\operation\Result; |
||
5 | use function einfach\operation\response\ok; |
||
6 | use function einfach\operation\response\error; |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
7 | |||
8 | class UpdateOperation implements \einfach\operation\IOperation |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Comprehensibility
Best Practice
introduced
by
The type
UpdateOperation has been defined more than once; this definition is ignored, only the first definition in examples/crud/UpdateOperation.php (L7-29) is considered.
This check looks for classes that have been defined more than once. If you can, we would recommend to use standard object-oriented programming techniques. For example, to avoid multiple types, it might make sense to create a common interface, and then multiple, different implementations for that interface. This also has the side-effect of providing you with better IDE auto-completion, static analysis and also better OPCode caching from PHP. ![]() PSR1 recommends that each class must be in a namespace of at least one level to avoid collisions.
You can fix this by adding a namespace to your class: namespace YourVendor;
class YourClass { }
When choosing a vendor namespace, try to pick something that is not too generic to avoid conflicts with other libraries. ![]() |
|||
9 | { |
||
10 | public function railway() : Railway |
||
11 | { |
||
12 | return (new Railway) |
||
13 | ->step(function ($params) { |
||
14 | echo "Hey {$params['name']}. Say hello to anonymous function!"; |
||
15 | //return error($params, 'Early fail'); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
70% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
16 | return ok($params, ['newParam' => 'newValue']); |
||
17 | }, ['name' => 'First']) |
||
18 | ->step([$this, 'nestedRailway']) |
||
19 | ->step([$this, 'castRequest'], ['name' => 'CastReq']) |
||
20 | ->step([$this, 'validateRequest']) |
||
21 | ->step(function ($params) { |
||
22 | return ok($params); |
||
23 | //return error($params, 'AAA!!!'); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
70% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
24 | }, ['failFast' => true]) |
||
25 | ->step([$this, 'findUser']) |
||
26 | ->step([$this, 'updateDB']) |
||
27 | ->removeStep('CastReq') |
||
28 | ->tryCatch([$this, 'sendNotification']) |
||
29 | ->always([$this, 'writeLog']) |
||
30 | ->failure([$this, 'notifyAdmin'], ['name' => 'Last']) |
||
31 | ->step(function ($params) { |
||
32 | return ok($params, ['a' => 'b']); |
||
33 | }, ['after' => 'First', 'name' => 'FinalCheck']); |
||
34 | } |
||
35 | |||
36 | public function __invoke(array $params) : Result |
||
37 | { |
||
38 | return $this->railway()->runWithParams($params); |
||
39 | } |
||
40 | |||
41 | public function nestedRailway($params) |
||
42 | { |
||
43 | return (new Railway) |
||
44 | ->step(function ($params) { |
||
45 | //return error($params, 'Nested Railway failed!'); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
70% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
46 | return ok($params, ['nestedRwParam' => 'nestedRwValue']); |
||
47 | }) |
||
48 | ->runWithParams($params); |
||
49 | } |
||
50 | |||
51 | public function castRequest($params) |
||
52 | { |
||
53 | return ok($params); |
||
54 | } |
||
55 | |||
56 | public function validateRequest($params) |
||
57 | { |
||
58 | return ok($params); |
||
59 | } |
||
60 | |||
61 | public function findUser($params) |
||
62 | { |
||
63 | // pretend I am doing a query |
||
64 | // $user = DB::findById($params['id']); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
60% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
65 | $user = (object) ['id' => 123, 'name' => 'Eugene', 'phone' => '111111']; |
||
66 | //return error($params, 'User not found!'); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
70% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
67 | return ok($params, ['model' => $user]); |
||
68 | } |
||
69 | |||
70 | public function updateDB($params) |
||
71 | { |
||
72 | return ok($params); |
||
73 | } |
||
74 | |||
75 | public function sendNotification($params) |
||
76 | { |
||
77 | //throw new \Exception("Hey there, Exception!"); |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
67% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
78 | return ok($params); |
||
79 | } |
||
80 | |||
81 | public function writeLog($params) |
||
82 | { |
||
83 | return ok($params); |
||
84 | } |
||
85 | |||
86 | public function notifyAdmin($params) |
||
87 | { |
||
88 | return ok($params); |
||
89 | } |
||
90 | } |
||
91 | |||
92 | |||
93 | /* |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
53% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
94 | |||
95 | $castRequest = castRequest($request); // always success (one-way track) // Success |
||
96 | $validRequest = validateRequest($castRequest); // true or false (two ways tracks) // Step |
||
97 | $dbResult = updateDB($validRequest); // does not return (dead-end track) // Step |
||
98 | sendNotification($dbResult, $validRequest); // try catch // TryCatch |
||
99 | writeLog($dbResult, $validRequest); // supervisory (do smth for both tracks) // Proxy |
||
100 | render($dbResult, $validRequest); |
||
101 | |||
102 | */ |
||
103 | |||
104 | // WRAPPER EXAMPLE WITH TRANSACTIONS |
||
0 ignored issues
–
show
Unused Code
Comprehensibility
introduced
by
58% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?
Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. ![]() |
|||
105 | //->step(function ($params) use ($dbConn) { |
||
106 | // /** @var $pipe Pipe */ |
||
107 | // $params['dbConn'] = $dbConn; |
||
108 | // |
||
109 | // return Pipe::with($params) |
||
110 | // ->tryCatch(function ($params) { |
||
111 | // return $params['dbConn']->beginTransaction(); |
||
112 | // }) |
||
113 | // ->step(function ($params) { |
||
114 | // return $params['dbConn']->createCommand('SQL #1')->execute(); |
||
115 | // }) |
||
116 | // ->step(function ($params) { |
||
117 | // return $params['dbConn']->createCommand('SQL #2')->execute(); |
||
118 | // }) |
||
119 | // ->tryCatch(function ($params) { |
||
120 | // return $params['transaction']->commit(); |
||
121 | // }) |
||
122 | // ->fail(function ($params) { |
||
123 | // return $params['transaction']->rollBack(); |
||
124 | // }) |
||
125 | // ->run(); |
||
126 | //}) |
||
127 |
Let’s assume that you have a directory layout like this:
and let’s assume the following content of
Bar.php
:If both files
OtherDir/Foo.php
andSomeDir/Foo.php
are loaded in the same runtime, you will see a PHP error such as the following:PHP Fatal error: Cannot use SomeDir\Foo as Foo because the name is already in use in OtherDir/Foo.php
However, as
OtherDir/Foo.php
does not necessarily have to be loaded and the error is only triggered if it is loaded beforeOtherDir/Bar.php
, this problem might go unnoticed for a while. In order to prevent this error from surfacing, you must import the namespace with a different alias: