Error::description()   A
last analyzed

Complexity

Conditions 2
Paths 2

Size

Total Lines 4
Code Lines 2

Duplication

Lines 0
Ratio 0 %

Code Coverage

Tests 0
CRAP Score 6

Importance

Changes 0
Metric Value
dl 0
loc 4
ccs 0
cts 4
cp 0
rs 10
c 0
b 0
f 0
cc 2
eloc 2
nc 2
nop 0
crap 6
1
<?php
2
3
/**
4
 *
5
 * This file is part of the Apix Project.
6
 *
7
 * (c) Franck Cassedanne <franck at ouarz.net>
8
 *
9
 * @license     http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause  New BSD License
10
 *
11
 */
12
13
namespace Apix\View\ViewModel;
14
15
use Apix\View\ViewModel,
16
    Apix\Response;
17
18
class Error extends Common
19
{
20
    protected $_layout = 'man_error';
21
22
    public function title()
23
    {
24
        return 'Error '
25
                . $this->code
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
The property code does not exist. Did you maybe forget to declare it?

In PHP it is possible to write to properties without declaring them. For example, the following is perfectly valid PHP code:

class MyClass { }

$x = new MyClass();
$x->foo = true;

Generally, it is a good practice to explictly declare properties to avoid accidental typos and provide IDE auto-completion:

class MyClass {
    public $foo;
}

$x = new MyClass();
$x->foo = true;
Loading history...
26
                . ' - ' . Response::getStatusPrases($this->code, false);
27
    }
28
29
    public function description()
30
    {
31
        return $this->message ?: Response::getStatusPrases($this->code, true);
0 ignored issues
show
Bug introduced by
The property message does not exist. Did you maybe forget to declare it?

In PHP it is possible to write to properties without declaring them. For example, the following is perfectly valid PHP code:

class MyClass { }

$x = new MyClass();
$x->foo = true;

Generally, it is a good practice to explictly declare properties to avoid accidental typos and provide IDE auto-completion:

class MyClass {
    public $foo;
}

$x = new MyClass();
$x->foo = true;
Loading history...
32
    }
33
34
    // // deals with groups definitions
35
    // public function groups()
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
50% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
36
    // {
37
    //     $titles = array(
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
43% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
38
    //         'message'    => 'Message',
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
58% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
39
    //         'code'       => 'Code'
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
50% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
40
    //     );
41
    //     $groups = array();
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
56% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
42
    //     foreach ($titles as $key => $title) {
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
57% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
43
    //         if (isset($this->{$key})) {
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
80% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
44
    //             $groups[] = array('title' => $title, 'items' => (array) $this->{$key});
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
66% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
45
    //         }
46
    //     }
47
48
    //     return $groups;
49
    // }
50
51
}
52