Conditions | 16 |
Paths | 37 |
Total Lines | 66 |
Code Lines | 41 |
Lines | 0 |
Ratio | 0 % |
Changes | 1 | ||
Bugs | 0 | Features | 0 |
Small methods make your code easier to understand, in particular if combined with a good name. Besides, if your method is small, finding a good name is usually much easier.
For example, if you find yourself adding comments to a method's body, this is usually a good sign to extract the commented part to a new method, and use the comment as a starting point when coming up with a good name for this new method.
Commonly applied refactorings include:
If many parameters/temporary variables are present:
1 | <?php |
||
53 | public function handle(ServerRequestInterface $request): ResponseInterface |
||
54 | { |
||
55 | $this->layout = 'layouts/administration'; |
||
56 | |||
57 | $tree = $request->getAttribute('tree'); |
||
58 | assert($tree instanceof Tree); |
||
59 | |||
60 | $xref1 = $request->getQueryParams()['xref1'] ?? ''; |
||
61 | $xref2 = $request->getQueryParams()['xref2'] ?? ''; |
||
62 | |||
63 | $title = I18N::translate('Merge records') . ' — ' . e($tree->title()); |
||
64 | |||
65 | $record1 = GedcomRecord::getInstance($xref1, $tree); |
||
66 | $record2 = GedcomRecord::getInstance($xref2, $tree); |
||
67 | |||
68 | if ( |
||
69 | $record1 === null || |
||
70 | $record2 === null || |
||
71 | $record1 === $record2 || |
||
72 | $record1::RECORD_TYPE !== $record2::RECORD_TYPE || |
||
73 | $record1->isPendingDeletion() || |
||
74 | $record2->isPendingDeletion() |
||
75 | ) { |
||
76 | return redirect(route(MergeRecordsPage::class, [ |
||
77 | 'tree' => $tree->name(), |
||
78 | 'xref1' => $xref1, |
||
79 | 'xref2' => $xref2, |
||
80 | ])); |
||
81 | } |
||
82 | |||
83 | // Facts found both records |
||
84 | $facts = []; |
||
85 | |||
86 | // Facts found in only one record |
||
87 | $facts1 = []; |
||
88 | $facts2 = []; |
||
89 | |||
90 | foreach ($record1->facts() as $fact) { |
||
91 | if (!$fact->isPendingDeletion() && $fact->getTag() !== 'CHAN') { |
||
92 | $facts1[$fact->id()] = $fact; |
||
93 | } |
||
94 | } |
||
95 | |||
96 | foreach ($record2->facts() as $fact) { |
||
97 | if (!$fact->isPendingDeletion() && $fact->getTag() !== 'CHAN') { |
||
98 | $facts2[$fact->id()] = $fact; |
||
99 | } |
||
100 | } |
||
101 | |||
102 | foreach ($facts1 as $id1 => $fact1) { |
||
103 | foreach ($facts2 as $id2 => $fact2) { |
||
104 | if ($fact1->id() === $fact2->id()) { |
||
105 | $facts[] = $fact1; |
||
106 | unset($facts1[$id1], $facts2[$id2]); |
||
107 | } |
||
108 | } |
||
109 | } |
||
110 | |||
111 | return $this->viewResponse('admin/merge-records-step-2', [ |
||
112 | 'facts' => $facts, |
||
113 | 'facts1' => $facts1, |
||
114 | 'facts2' => $facts2, |
||
115 | 'record1' => $record1, |
||
116 | 'record2' => $record2, |
||
117 | 'title' => $title, |
||
118 | 'tree' => $tree, |
||
119 | ]); |
||
122 |