| Conditions | 15 |
| Total Lines | 59 |
| Code Lines | 40 |
| Lines | 0 |
| Ratio | 0 % |
| Changes | 0 | ||
Small methods make your code easier to understand, in particular if combined with a good name. Besides, if your method is small, finding a good name is usually much easier.
For example, if you find yourself adding comments to a method's body, this is usually a good sign to extract the commented part to a new method, and use the comment as a starting point when coming up with a good name for this new method.
Commonly applied refactorings include:
If many parameters/temporary variables are present:
Complex classes like dynamodb.CreateTableRequest.ToInput often do a lot of different things. To break such a class down, we need to identify a cohesive component within that class. A common approach to find such a component is to look for fields/methods that share the same prefixes, or suffixes.
Once you have determined the fields that belong together, you can apply the Extract Class refactoring. If the component makes sense as a sub-class, Extract Subclass is also a candidate, and is often faster.
| 1 | package dynamodb |
||
| 43 | func (r CreateTableRequest) ToInput() *SDK.CreateTableInput { |
||
| 44 | in := &SDK.CreateTableInput{} |
||
| 45 | |||
| 46 | if r.TableName != "" { |
||
| 47 | in.TableName = pointers.String(r.TableName) |
||
| 48 | } |
||
| 49 | if len(r.AttributeDefinitions) != 0 { |
||
| 50 | list := make([]SDK.AttributeDefinition, len(r.AttributeDefinitions)) |
||
| 51 | for i, v := range r.AttributeDefinitions { |
||
| 52 | list[i] = v.ToSDK() |
||
| 53 | } |
||
| 54 | in.AttributeDefinitions = list |
||
| 55 | } |
||
| 56 | if len(r.KeySchema) != 0 { |
||
| 57 | list := make([]SDK.KeySchemaElement, len(r.KeySchema)) |
||
| 58 | for i, v := range r.KeySchema { |
||
| 59 | list[i] = v.ToSDK() |
||
| 60 | } |
||
| 61 | in.KeySchema = list |
||
| 62 | } |
||
| 63 | |||
| 64 | in.BillingMode = SDK.BillingMode(r.BillingMode) |
||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | if len(r.GlobalSecondaryIndexes) != 0 { |
||
| 67 | list := make([]SDK.GlobalSecondaryIndex, len(r.GlobalSecondaryIndexes)) |
||
| 68 | for i, v := range r.GlobalSecondaryIndexes { |
||
| 69 | list[i] = v.ToSDK() |
||
| 70 | } |
||
| 71 | in.GlobalSecondaryIndexes = list |
||
| 72 | } |
||
| 73 | if len(r.LocalSecondaryIndexes) != 0 { |
||
| 74 | list := make([]SDK.LocalSecondaryIndex, len(r.LocalSecondaryIndexes)) |
||
| 75 | for i, v := range r.LocalSecondaryIndexes { |
||
| 76 | list[i] = v.ToSDK() |
||
| 77 | } |
||
| 78 | in.LocalSecondaryIndexes = list |
||
| 79 | } |
||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | if r.ProvisionedThroughput.hasValue() { |
||
| 82 | v := r.ProvisionedThroughput.ToSDK() |
||
| 83 | in.ProvisionedThroughput = &v |
||
| 84 | } |
||
| 85 | if r.SSESpecification.hasValue() { |
||
| 86 | v := r.SSESpecification.ToSDK() |
||
| 87 | in.SSESpecification = &v |
||
| 88 | } |
||
| 89 | if r.StreamSpecification.hasValue() { |
||
| 90 | v := r.StreamSpecification.ToSDK() |
||
| 91 | in.StreamSpecification = &v |
||
| 92 | } |
||
| 93 | |||
| 94 | if len(r.Tags) != 0 { |
||
| 95 | list := make([]SDK.Tag, len(r.Tags)) |
||
| 96 | for i, v := range r.Tags { |
||
| 97 | list[i] = v.ToSDK() |
||
| 98 | } |
||
| 99 | in.Tags = list |
||
| 100 | } |
||
| 101 | return in |
||
| 102 | } |
||
| 120 |