StatusParser::parse() - Code Metrics - Inspection of "disable php >= 7 for now" - eduVPN/vpn-server-api - Measure and Improve Code Quality continuously with Scrutinizer

Completed

Push — master ( d7e253...55763c )

by François

created 2016-09-13 08:05 UTC

StatusParser::parse() C

↳ Parent: StatusParser

Complexity

Conditions	7
Paths	27

Size

Total Lines	50
Code Lines	19

Duplication

Lines	0
Ratio	0 %

Importance

Changes

Metric	Value
dl	0
loc	50
rs	6.7272
c	0
b	0
f	0
cc	7
eloc	19
nc	27
nop	1

<?php
/**
 *  Copyright (C) 2016 SURFnet.
 *
 *  This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 *  it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
 *  published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
 *  License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 *  This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 *  but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 *  MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 *  GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
 *
 *  You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
 *  along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
 */
namespace SURFnet\VPN\Server\OpenVpn;

/**
 * Parses the response from the OpenVPN `status 2` command.
 *
 * NOTE: The OpenVPN instance MUST NOT have --duplicate-cn in the configuration
 * as we do not deal with multiple connections with the same CN, due to bugs in
 * udp6 status report where the client port is not mentioned in the
 * 'Real Address' column
 */
class StatusParser
{
    public static function parse(array $statusData)
    {
        //TITLE,OpenVPN 2.3.9 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [EPOLL] [PKCS11] [MH] [IPv6] built on Dec 16 2015

        //TIME,Wed Dec 23 12:52:08 2015,1450875128

        //HEADER,CLIENT_LIST,Common Name,Real Address,Virtual Address,Bytes Received,Bytes Sent,Connected Since,Connected Since (time_t),Username
        //CLIENT_LIST,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,10.42.42.2,127707,127903,Wed Dec 23 12:49:15 2015,1450874955,UNDEF

        //CLIENT_LIST,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,10.42.42.3,127229,180419,Wed Dec 23 12:05:28 2015,1450872328,UNDEF

        //HEADER,ROUTING_TABLE,Virtual Address,Common Name,Real Address,Last Ref,Last Ref (time_t)
        //ROUTING_TABLE,10.42.42.2,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,Wed Dec 23 12:52:07 2015,1450875127

        //ROUTING_TABLE,fd00:4242:4242::1000,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,Wed Dec 23 12:50:42 2015,1450875042

        //ROUTING_TABLE,fd00:4242:4242::1001,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,Wed Dec 23 12:28:53 2015,1450873733

        //ROUTING_TABLE,10.42.42.3,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,Wed Dec 23 12:50:46 2015,1450875046

        //GLOBAL_STATS,Max bcast/mcast queue length,0
        //END

        // for now, we log all statusData to get a good corpus for writing
        // tests

        //error_log(json_encode($statusData));


        $clientListStart = 0;
        $routingTableStart = 0;
        $globalStatsStart = 0;

        for ($i = 0; $i < sizeof($statusData); ++$i) {
for ($i=0; $i<count($array); $i++) { // calls count() on each iteration
}

// Better
for ($i=0, $c=count($array); $i<$c; $i++) { // calls count() just once
}
            if (0 === strpos($statusData[$i], 'HEADER,CLIENT_LIST')) {
                $clientListStart = $i;
            }
            if (0 === strpos($statusData[$i], 'HEADER,ROUTING_TABLE')) {
                $routingTableStart = $i;
            }
            if (0 === strpos($statusData[$i], 'GLOBAL_STATS')) {
                $globalStatsStart = $i;
            }
        }

        $parsedClientList = self::parseClientList(array_slice($statusData, $clientListStart, $routingTableStart - $clientListStart));
        $parsedRoutingTable = self::parseRoutingTable(array_slice($statusData, $routingTableStart, $globalStatsStart - $routingTableStart));

        // merge routing table in client list
        foreach ($parsedClientList as $key => $value) {
            if (!array_key_exists($key, $parsedRoutingTable)) {
                $parsedClientList[$key]['virtual_address'] = array();
            } else {
                $parsedClientList[$key]['virtual_address'] = $parsedRoutingTable[$key];
            }
        }

        return array_values($parsedClientList);
    }

    private static function parseClientList(array $clientList)
    {
        //HEADER,CLIENT_LIST,Common Name,Real Address,Virtual Address,Bytes Received,Bytes Sent,Connected Since,Connected Since (time_t),Username
        //CLIENT_LIST,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,10.42.42.2,127707,127903,Wed Dec 23 12:49:15 2015,1450874955,UNDEF

        //CLIENT_LIST,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,10.42.42.3,127229,180419,Wed Dec 23 12:05:28 2015,1450872328,UNDEF

        $parsedClientList = array();
        for ($i = 1; $i < sizeof($clientList); ++$i) {
for ($i=0; $i<count($array); $i++) { // calls count() on each iteration
}

// Better
for ($i=0, $c=count($array); $i<$c; $i++) { // calls count() just once
}
            $parsedClient = str_getcsv($clientList[$i]);
            $commonName = $parsedClient[1];
            if (array_key_exists($commonName, $parsedClientList)) {
if (rand(1, 6) > 3) {
//print "Check failed";
} else {
    print "Check succeeded";
}
                //syslog(LOG_ERR('duplicate common name, possibly --duplicate-cn enabled in server configuration'));

            }
            $parsedClientList[$commonName] = array(
                'common_name' => $commonName,
                'user_id' => explode('_', $commonName, 2)[0],
                'name' => explode('_', $commonName, 2)[1],
                'real_address' => $parsedClient[2],
                //'virtual_address' => $parsedClient[3],

                'bytes_in' => intval($parsedClient[4]),
                'bytes_out' => intval($parsedClient[5]),
                'connected_since' => intval($parsedClient[7]),
            );
        }

        return $parsedClientList;
    }

    private static function parseRoutingTable(array $routingTable)
    {
        //HEADER,ROUTING_TABLE,Virtual Address,Common Name,Real Address,Last Ref,Last Ref (time_t)
        //ROUTING_TABLE,10.42.42.2,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,Wed Dec 23 12:52:07 2015,1450875127

        //ROUTING_TABLE,fd00:4242:4242::1000,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,Wed Dec 23 12:50:42 2015,1450875042

        //ROUTING_TABLE,fd00:4242:4242::1001,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,Wed Dec 23 12:28:53 2015,1450873733

        //ROUTING_TABLE,10.42.42.3,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,Wed Dec 23 12:50:46 2015,1450875046

        $parsedRoutingTable = array();
        for ($i = 1; $i < sizeof($routingTable); ++$i) {
for ($i=0; $i<count($array); $i++) { // calls count() on each iteration
}

// Better
for ($i=0, $c=count($array); $i<$c; $i++) { // calls count() just once
}
            $parsedRoute = str_getcsv($routingTable[$i]);
            $commonName = $parsedRoute[2];
            if (!array_key_exists($commonName, $parsedRoutingTable)) {
                $parsedRoutingTable[$commonName] = array();
            }
            $parsedRoutingTable[$commonName][] = $parsedRoute[1];
        }

        return $parsedRoutingTable;
    }
}


1			<?php
2			/**
3			* Copyright (C) 2016 SURFnet.
4			*
5			* This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
6			* it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
7			* published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
8			* License, or (at your option) any later version.
9			*
10			* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11			* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12			* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
13			* GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
14			*
15			* You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
16			* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
17			*/
18			namespace SURFnet\VPN\Server\OpenVpn;
19
20			/**
21			* Parses the response from the OpenVPN `status 2` command.
22			*
23			* NOTE: The OpenVPN instance MUST NOT have --duplicate-cn in the configuration
24			* as we do not deal with multiple connections with the same CN, due to bugs in
25			* udp6 status report where the client port is not mentioned in the
26			* 'Real Address' column
27			*/
28			class StatusParser
29			{
30			public static function parse(array $statusData)
31			{
32			//TITLE,OpenVPN 2.3.9 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [EPOLL] [PKCS11] [MH] [IPv6] built on Dec 16 2015
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `37%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
33			//TIME,Wed Dec 23 12:52:08 2015,1450875128
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `59%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
34			//HEADER,CLIENT_LIST,Common Name,Real Address,Virtual Address,Bytes Received,Bytes Sent,Connected Since,Connected Since (time_t),Username
35			//CLIENT_LIST,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,10.42.42.2,127707,127903,Wed Dec 23 12:49:15 2015,1450874955,UNDEF
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `73%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
36			//CLIENT_LIST,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,10.42.42.3,127229,180419,Wed Dec 23 12:05:28 2015,1450872328,UNDEF
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `73%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
37			//HEADER,ROUTING_TABLE,Virtual Address,Common Name,Real Address,Last Ref,Last Ref (time_t)
38			//ROUTING_TABLE,10.42.42.2,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,Wed Dec 23 12:52:07 2015,1450875127
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `70%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
39			//ROUTING_TABLE,fd00:4242:4242::1000,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,Wed Dec 23 12:50:42 2015,1450875042
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `67%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
40			//ROUTING_TABLE,fd00:4242:4242::1001,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,Wed Dec 23 12:28:53 2015,1450873733
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-08-19 12:28 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `67%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
41			//ROUTING_TABLE,10.42.42.3,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,Wed Dec 23 12:50:46 2015,1450875046
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-08-19 12:28 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `70%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
42			//GLOBAL_STATS,Max bcast/mcast queue length,0
43			//END
44
45			// for now, we log all statusData to get a good corpus for writing
46			// tests
47
48			//error_log(json_encode($statusData));
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `75%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
49
50			$clientListStart = 0;
51			$routingTableStart = 0;
52			$globalStatsStart = 0;
53
54			for ($i = 0; $i < sizeof($statusData); ++$i) {
			0 ignored issues – show Performance Best Practice introduced 2015-12-27 23:56 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report It seems like you are calling the size function `sizeof()` as part of the test condition. You might want to compute the size beforehand, and not on each iteration. If the size of the collection does not change during the iteration, it is generally a good practice to compute it beforehand, and not on each iteration: for ($i=0; $i<count($array); $i++) { // calls count() on each iteration } // Better for ($i=0, $c=count($array); $i<$c; $i++) { // calls count() just once } Loading history...
55			if (0 === strpos($statusData[$i], 'HEADER,CLIENT_LIST')) {
56			$clientListStart = $i;
57			}
58			if (0 === strpos($statusData[$i], 'HEADER,ROUTING_TABLE')) {
59			$routingTableStart = $i;
60			}
61			if (0 === strpos($statusData[$i], 'GLOBAL_STATS')) {
62			$globalStatsStart = $i;
63			}
64			}
65
66			$parsedClientList = self::parseClientList(array_slice($statusData, $clientListStart, $routingTableStart - $clientListStart));
67			$parsedRoutingTable = self::parseRoutingTable(array_slice($statusData, $routingTableStart, $globalStatsStart - $routingTableStart));
68
69			// merge routing table in client list
70			foreach ($parsedClientList as $key => $value) {
71			if (!array_key_exists($key, $parsedRoutingTable)) {
72			$parsedClientList[$key]['virtual_address'] = array();
73			} else {
74			$parsedClientList[$key]['virtual_address'] = $parsedRoutingTable[$key];
75			}
76			}
77
78			return array_values($parsedClientList);
79			}
80
81			private static function parseClientList(array $clientList)
82			{
83			//HEADER,CLIENT_LIST,Common Name,Real Address,Virtual Address,Bytes Received,Bytes Sent,Connected Since,Connected Since (time_t),Username
84			//CLIENT_LIST,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,10.42.42.2,127707,127903,Wed Dec 23 12:49:15 2015,1450874955,UNDEF
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-08-19 12:28 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `73%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
85			//CLIENT_LIST,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,10.42.42.3,127229,180419,Wed Dec 23 12:05:28 2015,1450872328,UNDEF
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-08-19 12:28 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `73%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
86			$parsedClientList = array();
87			for ($i = 1; $i < sizeof($clientList); ++$i) {
			0 ignored issues – show Performance Best Practice introduced 2015-12-27 23:56 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report It seems like you are calling the size function `sizeof()` as part of the test condition. You might want to compute the size beforehand, and not on each iteration. If the size of the collection does not change during the iteration, it is generally a good practice to compute it beforehand, and not on each iteration: for ($i=0; $i<count($array); $i++) { // calls count() on each iteration } // Better for ($i=0, $c=count($array); $i<$c; $i++) { // calls count() just once } Loading history...
88			$parsedClient = str_getcsv($clientList[$i]);
89			$commonName = $parsedClient[1];
90			if (array_key_exists($commonName, $parsedClientList)) {
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-02-22 11:11 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report This `if` statement is empty and can be removed. This check looks for the bodies of `if` statements that have no statements or where all statements have been commented out. This may be the result of changes for debugging or the code may simply be obsolete. These `if` bodies can be removed. If you have an empty if but statements in the `else` branch, consider inverting the condition. if (rand(1, 6) > 3) { //print "Check failed"; } else { print "Check succeeded"; } could be turned into if (rand(1, 6) <= 3) { print "Check succeeded"; } This is much more concise to read. Loading history...
91			//syslog(LOG_ERR('duplicate common name, possibly --duplicate-cn enabled in server configuration'));
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-22 11:11 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `75%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
92			}
93			$parsedClientList[$commonName] = array(
94			'common_name' => $commonName,
95			'user_id' => explode('_', $commonName, 2)[0],
96			'name' => explode('_', $commonName, 2)[1],
97			'real_address' => $parsedClient[2],
98			//'virtual_address' => $parsedClient[3],
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `78%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
99			'bytes_in' => intval($parsedClient[4]),
100			'bytes_out' => intval($parsedClient[5]),
101			'connected_since' => intval($parsedClient[7]),
102			);
103			}
104
105			return $parsedClientList;
106			}
107
108			private static function parseRoutingTable(array $routingTable)
109			{
110			//HEADER,ROUTING_TABLE,Virtual Address,Common Name,Real Address,Last Ref,Last Ref (time_t)
111			//ROUTING_TABLE,10.42.42.2,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,Wed Dec 23 12:52:07 2015,1450875127
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-08-19 12:28 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `70%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
112			//ROUTING_TABLE,fd00:4242:4242::1000,fkooman_ziptest,::ffff:91.64.87.183,Wed Dec 23 12:50:42 2015,1450875042
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-08-19 12:28 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `67%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
113			//ROUTING_TABLE,fd00:4242:4242::1001,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,Wed Dec 23 12:28:53 2015,1450873733
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `67%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
114			//ROUTING_TABLE,10.42.42.3,sebas_tuxed_SGS6,::ffff:83.83.194.107,Wed Dec 23 12:50:46 2015,1450875046
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2016-02-11 12:27 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report `70%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
115			$parsedRoutingTable = array();
116			for ($i = 1; $i < sizeof($routingTable); ++$i) {
			0 ignored issues – show Performance Best Practice introduced 2015-12-27 23:56 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report It seems like you are calling the size function `sizeof()` as part of the test condition. You might want to compute the size beforehand, and not on each iteration. If the size of the collection does not change during the iteration, it is generally a good practice to compute it beforehand, and not on each iteration: for ($i=0; $i<count($array); $i++) { // calls count() on each iteration } // Better for ($i=0, $c=count($array); $i<$c; $i++) { // calls count() just once } Loading history...
117			$parsedRoute = str_getcsv($routingTable[$i]);
118			$commonName = $parsedRoute[2];
119			if (!array_key_exists($commonName, $parsedRoutingTable)) {
120			$parsedRoutingTable[$commonName] = array();
121			}
122			$parsedRoutingTable[$commonName][] = $parsedRoute[1];
123			}
124
125			return $parsedRoutingTable;
126			}
127			}
128

eduVPN / vpn-server-api

GitHub Access Token became invalid

Push — master ( d7e253...55763c )

StatusParser::parse() C

Complexity

Size

Duplication

Importance

Duplication Side-by-Side

Filter issues like