| Conditions | 18 | 
| Total Lines | 151 | 
| Lines | 0 | 
| Ratio | 0 % | 
Small methods make your code easier to understand, in particular if combined with a good name. Besides, if your method is small, finding a good name is usually much easier.
For example, if you find yourself adding comments to a method's body, this is usually a good sign to extract the commented part to a new method, and use the comment as a starting point when coming up with a good name for this new method.
Commonly applied refactorings include:
If many parameters/temporary variables are present:
Complex classes like coalib.bearlib.languages.documentation.extract_documentation_with_docstyle() often do a lot of different things. To break such a class down, we need to identify a cohesive component within that class. A common approach to find such a component is to look for fields/methods that share the same prefixes, or suffixes.
Once you have determined the fields that belong together, you can apply the Extract Class refactoring. If the component makes sense as a sub-class, Extract Subclass is also a candidate, and is often faster.
| 1 | import re | ||
| 25 | def extract_documentation_with_docstyle(content, docstyle_definition): | ||
| 26 | """ | ||
| 27 | Extracts all documentation texts inside the given source-code-string. | ||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | :param content: The source-code-string where to extract | ||
| 30 | documentation from or an iterable with strings | ||
| 31 | where each string is a single line (including | ||
| 32 | ending whitespaces like `\\n`). | ||
| 33 | :param docstyle_definition: The DocstyleDefinition that identifies the | ||
| 34 | documentation comments. | ||
| 35 | :return: An iterator returning each documentation text | ||
| 36 | found in the content. | ||
| 37 | """ | ||
| 38 | if isinstance(content, str): | ||
| 39 | content = content.splitlines(keepends=True) | ||
| 40 | else: | ||
| 41 | content = list(content) | ||
| 42 | |||
| 43 | # Prepare marker-tuple dict that maps a begin pattern to the corresponding | ||
| 44 | # marker_set(s). This makes it faster to retrieve a marker-set from a | ||
| 45 | # begin sequence we initially want to search for in source code. Then | ||
| 46 | # the possible found documentation match is processed further with the | ||
| 47 | # rest markers. | ||
| 48 |     begin_sequence_dict = {} | ||
| 49 | for marker_set in docstyle_definition.markers: | ||
| 50 | if marker_set[0] not in begin_sequence_dict: | ||
| 51 | begin_sequence_dict[marker_set[0]] = [marker_set] | ||
| 52 | else: | ||
| 53 | begin_sequence_dict[marker_set[0]].append(marker_set) | ||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | # Using regexes to perform a variable match is faster than finding each | ||
| 56 | # substring with `str.find()` choosing the lowest match. | ||
| 57 | begin_regex = _compile_multi_match_regex( | ||
| 58 | marker_set[0] for marker_set in docstyle_definition.markers) | ||
| 59 | |||
| 60 | line = 0 | ||
| 61 | line_pos = 0 | ||
| 62 | while line < len(content): | ||
| 63 | begin_match = begin_regex.search(content[line], line_pos) | ||
| 64 | |||
| 65 | if begin_match: | ||
| 66 | begin_match_line = line | ||
| 67 | # Prevents infinite loop when the start marker matches but not the | ||
| 68 | # complete documentation comment. | ||
| 69 | line_pos = begin_match.end() | ||
| 70 | |||
| 71 | # begin_sequence_dict[begin_match.group()] returns the marker set | ||
| 72 | # the begin sequence from before matched. | ||
| 73 | for marker_set in begin_sequence_dict[begin_match.group()]: | ||
| 74 | try: | ||
| 75 | # If the each-line marker and the end marker do equal, | ||
| 76 | # search for the each-line marker until it runs out. | ||
| 77 | if marker_set[1] == marker_set[2]: | ||
| 78 | docstring = content[line][begin_match.end():] | ||
| 79 | |||
| 80 | line2 = line + 1 | ||
| 81 | stripped_content = content[line2].lstrip() | ||
| 82 | |||
| 83 | # Now the each-line marker is no requirement for a | ||
| 84 | # docstring any more, just extract as long as there are | ||
| 85 | # no each-line markers any more. | ||
| 86 | while (stripped_content[:len(marker_set[1])] == | ||
| 87 | marker_set[1]): | ||
| 88 | docstring += stripped_content[len(marker_set[1]):] | ||
| 89 | |||
| 90 | line2 += 1 | ||
| 91 | if line2 >= len(content): | ||
| 92 | # End of content reached, done with | ||
| 93 | # doc-extraction. | ||
| 94 | break | ||
| 95 | |||
| 96 | stripped_content = content[line2].lstrip() | ||
| 97 | |||
| 98 | line = line2 - 1 | ||
| 99 | line_pos = len(content[line]) | ||
| 100 | else: | ||
| 101 | end_marker_pos = content[line].find(marker_set[2], | ||
| 102 | begin_match.end()) | ||
| 103 | |||
| 104 | if end_marker_pos == -1: | ||
| 105 | docstring = content[line][begin_match.end():] | ||
| 106 | |||
| 107 | line2 = line + 1 | ||
| 108 | if line2 >= len(content): | ||
| 109 | continue | ||
| 110 | |||
| 111 | end_marker_pos = content[line2].find(marker_set[2]) | ||
| 112 | |||
| 113 | while end_marker_pos == -1: | ||
| 114 | if marker_set[1] == "": | ||
| 115 | # When no each-line marker is set (i.e. for | ||
| 116 | # Python docstrings), then align the | ||
| 117 | # comment to the start-marker. | ||
| 118 | stripped_content = ( | ||
| 119 | content[line2][begin_match.start():]) | ||
| 120 | else: | ||
| 121 | # Check whether we violate the each-line | ||
| 122 | # marker "rule". | ||
| 123 | current_each_line_marker = (content[line2] | ||
| 124 | [begin_match.start(): | ||
| 125 | begin_match.start() | ||
| 126 | + len(marker_set[1])]) | ||
| 127 | if (current_each_line_marker != | ||
| 128 | marker_set[1]): | ||
| 129 | # Effectively a 'continue' for the | ||
| 130 | # outer for-loop. | ||
| 131 | raise _BreakOut | ||
| 132 | |||
| 133 | stripped_content = ( | ||
| 134 | content[line2][begin_match.start() | ||
| 135 | + len(marker_set[1]):]) | ||
| 136 | |||
| 137 | docstring += stripped_content | ||
| 138 | line2 += 1 | ||
| 139 | |||
| 140 | if line2 >= len(content): | ||
| 141 | # End of content reached, so there's no | ||
| 142 | # closing marker and that's a mismatch. | ||
| 143 | raise _BreakOut | ||
| 144 | |||
| 145 | end_marker_pos = content[line2].find( | ||
| 146 | marker_set[2]) | ||
| 147 | |||
| 148 | docstring += (content[line2] | ||
| 149 | [begin_match.start():end_marker_pos]) | ||
| 150 | line = line2 | ||
| 151 | else: | ||
| 152 | docstring = (content[line] | ||
| 153 | [begin_match.end():end_marker_pos]) | ||
| 154 | |||
| 155 | line_pos = end_marker_pos + len(marker_set[2]) | ||
| 156 | |||
| 157 | rng = TextRange.from_values(begin_match_line + 1, | ||
| 158 | begin_match.start() + 1, | ||
| 159 | line + 1, | ||
| 160 | line_pos + 1) | ||
| 161 | |||
| 162 | yield DocumentationComment(docstring, | ||
| 163 | docstyle_definition, | ||
| 164 | marker_set, | ||
| 165 | rng) | ||
| 166 | |||
| 167 | break | ||
| 168 | |||
| 169 | except _BreakOut: | ||
| 170 | # Continues the marker_set loop. | ||
| 171 | pass | ||
| 172 | |||
| 173 | else: | ||
| 174 | line += 1 | ||
| 175 | line_pos = 0 | ||
| 176 | |||
| 205 |