View GitHub Repository Tech_Bench

Schedule Inspection
Subscribe
Completed
Pull Request — master (#70)
by Ron
13:25
created

underscore.js ➔ ... ➔ q   F

↳ Parent: underscore.js ➔ ???

Complexity

Conditions 35
Paths 199

Size

Total Lines 3
Code Lines 3

Duplication

Lines 0
Ratio 0 %

Importance

Changes 0
Metric Value
cc 35
eloc 3
nc 199
nop 3
dl 0
loc 3
rs 0
c 0
b 0
f 0

How to fix   Complexity   

Complexity

Complex classes like underscore.js ➔ ... ➔ q often do a lot of different things. To break such a class down, we need to identify a cohesive component within that class. A common approach to find such a component is to look for fields/methods that share the same prefixes, or suffixes.

Once you have determined the fields that belong together, you can apply the Extract Class refactoring. If the component makes sense as a sub-class, Extract Subclass is also a candidate, and is often faster.

1 
// Underscore.js 1.3.1
2 
// (c) 2009-2012 Jeremy Ashkenas, DocumentCloud Inc.
3 
// Underscore is freely distributable under the MIT license.
4 
// Portions of Underscore are inspired or borrowed from Prototype,
5 
// Oliver Steele's Functional, and John Resig's Micro-Templating.
6 
// For all details and documentation:
7 
// http://documentcloud.github.com/underscore
8 
(function(){function q(a,c,d){if(a===c)return a!==0||1/a==1/c;if(a==null||c==null)return a===c;if(a._chain)a=a._wrapped;if(c._chain)c=c._wrapped;if(a.isEqual&&b.isFunction(a.isEqual))return a.isEqual(c);if(c.isEqual&&b.isFunction(c.isEqual))return c.isEqual(a);var e=l.call(a);if(e!=l.call(c))return false;switch(e){case "[object String]":return a==String(c);case "[object Number]":return a!=+a?c!=+c:a==0?1/a==1/c:a==+c;case "[object Date]":case "[object Boolean]":return+a==+c;case "[object RegExp]":return a.source==
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing c to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
9 
c.source&&a.global==c.global&&a.multiline==c.multiline&&a.ignoreCase==c.ignoreCase}if(typeof a!="object"||typeof c!="object")return false;for(var f=d.length;f--;)if(d[f]==a)return true;d.push(a);var f=0,g=true;if(e=="[object Array]"){if(f=a.length,g=f==c.length)for(;f--;)if(!(g=f in a==f in c&&q(a[f],c[f],d)))break}else{if("constructor"in a!="constructor"in c||a.constructor!=c.constructor)return false;for(var h in a)if(b.has(a,h)&&(f++,!(g=b.has(c,h)&&q(a[h],c[h],d))))break;if(g){for(h in c)if(b.has(c,
0 ignored issues
– show
Complexity Coding Style introduced by
You seem to be assigning a new value to the loop variable f here. Please check if this was indeed your intention. Even if it was, consider using another kind of loop instead.
Loading history...
Comprehensibility introduced by
Usage of the sequence operator is discouraged, since it may lead to obfuscated code.

The sequence or comma operator allows the inclusion of multiple expressions where only is permitted. The result of the sequence is the value of the last expression.

This operator is most often used in for statements.

Used in another places it can make code hard to read, especially when people do not realize it even exists as a seperate operator.

This check looks for usage of the sequence operator in locations where it is not necessary and could be replaced by a series of expressions or statements.

var a,b,c;

a = 1, b = 1,  c= 3;

could just as well be written as:

var a,b,c;

a = 1;
b = 1;
c = 3;

To learn more about the sequence operator, please refer to the MDN.

Loading history...
Comprehensibility Naming Best Practice introduced by
The variable f already seems to be declared on line 9. Consider using another variable name or omitting the var keyword.

This check looks for variables that are declared in multiple lines. There may be several reasons for this.

In the simplest case the variable name was reused by mistake. This may lead to very hard to locate bugs.

If you want to reuse a variable for another purpose, consider declaring it at or near the top of your function and just assigning to it subsequently so it is always declared.

Loading history...
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Complexity introduced by
A for in loop automatically includes the property of any prototype object, consider checking the key using hasOwnProperty.

When iterating over the keys of an object, this includes not only the keys of the object, but also keys contained in the prototype of that object. It is generally a best practice to check for these keys specifically:

var someObject;
for (var key in someObject) {
    if ( ! someObject.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
        continue; // Skip keys from the prototype.
    }

    doSomethingWith(key);
}
Loading history...
10 
h)&&!f--)break;g=!f}}d.pop();return g}var r=this,G=r._,n={},k=Array.prototype,o=Object.prototype,i=k.slice,H=k.unshift,l=o.toString,I=o.hasOwnProperty,w=k.forEach,x=k.map,y=k.reduce,z=k.reduceRight,A=k.filter,B=k.every,C=k.some,p=k.indexOf,D=k.lastIndexOf,o=Array.isArray,J=Object.keys,s=Function.prototype.bind,b=function(a){return new m(a)};if(typeof exports!=="undefined"){if(typeof module!=="undefined"&&module.exports)exports=module.exports=b;exports._=b}else r._=b;b.VERSION="1.3.1";var j=b.each=
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
By convention, constructors like m should be capitalized.
Loading history...
Complexity Coding Style introduced by
You seem to be assigning a new value to the loop variable f here. Please check if this was indeed your intention. Even if it was, consider using another kind of loop instead.
Loading history...
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Comprehensibility Naming Best Practice introduced by
The variable o already seems to be declared on line 10. Consider using another variable name or omitting the var keyword.

This check looks for variables that are declared in multiple lines. There may be several reasons for this.

In the simplest case the variable name was reused by mistake. This may lead to very hard to locate bugs.

If you want to reuse a variable for another purpose, consider declaring it at or near the top of your function and just assigning to it subsequently so it is always declared.

Loading history...
11 
b.forEach=function(a,c,d){if(a!=null)if(w&&a.forEach===w)a.forEach(c,d);else if(a.length===+a.length)for(var e=0,f=a.length;e<f;e++){if(e in a&&c.call(d,a[e],e,a)===n)break}else for(e in a)if(b.has(a,e)&&c.call(d,a[e],e,a)===n)break};b.map=b.collect=function(a,c,b){var e=[];if(a==null)return e;if(x&&a.map===x)return a.map(c,b);j(a,function(a,g,h){e[e.length]=c.call(b,a,g,h)});if(a.length===+a.length)e.length=a.length;return e};b.reduce=b.foldl=b.inject=function(a,c,d,e){var f=arguments.length>2;a==
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a to null using the != operator is not safe. Consider using !== instead.
Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
12 
null&&(a=[]);if(y&&a.reduce===y)return e&&(c=b.bind(c,e)),f?a.reduce(c,d):a.reduce(c);j(a,function(a,b,i){f?d=c.call(e,d,a,b,i):(d=a,f=true)});if(!f)throw new TypeError("Reduce of empty array with no initial value");return d};b.reduceRight=b.foldr=function(a,c,d,e){var f=arguments.length>2;a==null&&(a=[]);if(z&&a.reduceRight===z)return e&&(c=b.bind(c,e)),f?a.reduceRight(c,d):a.reduceRight(c);var g=b.toArray(a).reverse();e&&!f&&(c=b.bind(c,e));return f?b.reduce(g,c,d,e):b.reduce(g,c)};b.find=b.detect=
0 ignored issues
– show
Comprehensibility introduced by
Usage of the sequence operator is discouraged, since it may lead to obfuscated code.

The sequence or comma operator allows the inclusion of multiple expressions where only is permitted. The result of the sequence is the value of the last expression.

This operator is most often used in for statements.

Used in another places it can make code hard to read, especially when people do not realize it even exists as a seperate operator.

This check looks for usage of the sequence operator in locations where it is not necessary and could be replaced by a series of expressions or statements.

var a,b,c;

a = 1, b = 1,  c= 3;

could just as well be written as:

var a,b,c;

a = 1;
b = 1;
c = 3;

To learn more about the sequence operator, please refer to the MDN.

Loading history...
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
13 
function(a,c,b){var e;E(a,function(a,g,h){if(c.call(b,a,g,h))return e=a,true});return e};b.filter=b.select=function(a,c,b){var e=[];if(a==null)return e;if(A&&a.filter===A)return a.filter(c,b);j(a,function(a,g,h){c.call(b,a,g,h)&&(e[e.length]=a)});return e};b.reject=function(a,c,b){var e=[];if(a==null)return e;j(a,function(a,g,h){c.call(b,a,g,h)||(e[e.length]=a)});return e};b.every=b.all=function(a,c,b){var e=true;if(a==null)return e;if(B&&a.every===B)return a.every(c,b);j(a,function(a,g,h){if(!(e=
0 ignored issues
– show
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Complexity Best Practice introduced by
There is no return statement if c.call(b, a, g, h) is false. Are you sure this is correct? If so, consider adding return; explicitly.

This check looks for functions where a return statement is found in some execution paths, but not in all.

Consider this little piece of code

function isBig(a) {
    if (a > 5000) {
        return "yes";
    }
}

console.log(isBig(5001)); //returns yes
console.log(isBig(42)); //returns undefined

The function isBig will only return a specific value when its parameter is bigger than 5000. In any other case, it will implicitly return undefined.

This behaviour may not be what you had intended. In any case, you can add a return undefined to the other execution path to make the return value explicit.

Loading history...
Complexity Best Practice introduced by
There is no return statement if !(e = e && c.call(b, a, g, h)) is false. Are you sure this is correct? If so, consider adding return; explicitly.

This check looks for functions where a return statement is found in some execution paths, but not in all.

Consider this little piece of code

function isBig(a) {
    if (a > 5000) {
        return "yes";
    }
}

console.log(isBig(5001)); //returns yes
console.log(isBig(42)); //returns undefined

The function isBig will only return a specific value when its parameter is bigger than 5000. In any other case, it will implicitly return undefined.

This behaviour may not be what you had intended. In any case, you can add a return undefined to the other execution path to make the return value explicit.

Loading history...
Comprehensibility introduced by
Usage of the sequence operator is discouraged, since it may lead to obfuscated code.

The sequence or comma operator allows the inclusion of multiple expressions where only is permitted. The result of the sequence is the value of the last expression.

This operator is most often used in for statements.

Used in another places it can make code hard to read, especially when people do not realize it even exists as a seperate operator.

This check looks for usage of the sequence operator in locations where it is not necessary and could be replaced by a series of expressions or statements.

var a,b,c;

a = 1, b = 1,  c= 3;

could just as well be written as:

var a,b,c;

a = 1;
b = 1;
c = 3;

To learn more about the sequence operator, please refer to the MDN.

Loading history...
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
14 
e&&c.call(b,a,g,h)))return n});return e};var E=b.some=b.any=function(a,c,d){c||(c=b.identity);var e=false;if(a==null)return e;if(C&&a.some===C)return a.some(c,d);j(a,function(a,b,h){if(e||(e=c.call(d,a,b,h)))return n});return!!e};b.include=b.contains=function(a,c){var b=false;if(a==null)return b;return p&&a.indexOf===p?a.indexOf(c)!=-1:b=E(a,function(a){return a===c})};b.invoke=function(a,c){var d=i.call(arguments,2);return b.map(a,function(a){return(b.isFunction(c)?c||a:a[c]).apply(a,d)})};b.pluck=
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Unused Code introduced by
The assignment to variable b seems to be never used. Consider removing it.
Loading history...
Complexity Best Practice introduced by
There is no return statement if e || e = c.call(d, a, b, h) is false. Are you sure this is correct? If so, consider adding return; explicitly.

This check looks for functions where a return statement is found in some execution paths, but not in all.

Consider this little piece of code

function isBig(a) {
    if (a > 5000) {
        return "yes";
    }
}

console.log(isBig(5001)); //returns yes
console.log(isBig(42)); //returns undefined

The function isBig will only return a specific value when its parameter is bigger than 5000. In any other case, it will implicitly return undefined.

This behaviour may not be what you had intended. In any case, you can add a return undefined to the other execution path to make the return value explicit.

Loading history...
15 View Code Duplication 
function(a,c){return b.map(a,function(a){return a[c]})};b.max=function(a,c,d){if(!c&&b.isArray(a))return Math.max.apply(Math,a);if(!c&&b.isEmpty(a))return-Infinity;var e={computed:-Infinity};j(a,function(a,b,h){b=c?c.call(d,a,b,h):a;b>=e.computed&&(e={value:a,computed:b})});return e.value};b.min=function(a,c,d){if(!c&&b.isArray(a))return Math.min.apply(Math,a);if(!c&&b.isEmpty(a))return Infinity;var e={computed:Infinity};j(a,function(a,b,h){b=c?c.call(d,a,b,h):a;b<e.computed&&(e={value:a,computed:b})});
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Duplication introduced by
This code seems to be duplicated in your project.
Loading history...
Duplication introduced by
This code seems to be duplicated in your project.
Loading history...
16 
return e.value};b.shuffle=function(a){var b=[],d;j(a,function(a,f){f==0?b[0]=a:(d=Math.floor(Math.random()*(f+1)),b[f]=b[d],b[d]=a)});return b};b.sortBy=function(a,c,d){return b.pluck(b.map(a,function(a,b,g){return{value:a,criteria:c.call(d,a,b,g)}}).sort(function(a,b){var c=a.criteria,d=b.criteria;return c<d?-1:c>d?1:0}),"value")};b.groupBy=function(a,c){var d={},e=b.isFunction(c)?c:function(a){return a[c]};j(a,function(a,b){var c=e(a,b);(d[c]||(d[c]=[])).push(a)});return d};b.sortedIndex=function(a,
0 ignored issues
– show
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing f to 0 using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Comprehensibility introduced by
Usage of the sequence operator is discouraged, since it may lead to obfuscated code.

The sequence or comma operator allows the inclusion of multiple expressions where only is permitted. The result of the sequence is the value of the last expression.

This operator is most often used in for statements.

Used in another places it can make code hard to read, especially when people do not realize it even exists as a seperate operator.

This check looks for usage of the sequence operator in locations where it is not necessary and could be replaced by a series of expressions or statements.

var a,b,c;

a = 1, b = 1,  c= 3;

could just as well be written as:

var a,b,c;

a = 1;
b = 1;
c = 3;

To learn more about the sequence operator, please refer to the MDN.

Loading history...
17 
c,d){d||(d=b.identity);for(var e=0,f=a.length;e<f;){var g=e+f>>1;d(a[g])<d(c)?e=g+1:f=g}return e};b.toArray=function(a){return!a?[]:a.toArray?a.toArray():b.isArray(a)?i.call(a):b.isArguments(a)?i.call(a):b.values(a)};b.size=function(a){return b.toArray(a).length};b.first=b.head=function(a,b,d){return b!=null&&!d?i.call(a,0,b):a[0]};b.initial=function(a,b,d){return i.call(a,0,a.length-(b==null||d?1:b))};b.last=function(a,b,d){return b!=null&&!d?i.call(a,Math.max(a.length-b,0)):a[a.length-1]};b.rest=
0 ignored issues
– show
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing b to null using the != operator is not safe. Consider using !== instead.
Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing b to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
18 
b.tail=function(a,b,d){return i.call(a,b==null||d?1:b)};b.compact=function(a){return b.filter(a,function(a){return!!a})};b.flatten=function(a,c){return b.reduce(a,function(a,e){if(b.isArray(e))return a.concat(c?e:b.flatten(e));a[a.length]=e;return a},[])};b.without=function(a){return b.difference(a,i.call(arguments,1))};b.uniq=b.unique=function(a,c,d){var d=d?b.map(a,d):a,e=[];b.reduce(d,function(d,g,h){if(0==h||(c===true?b.last(d)!=g:!b.include(d,g)))d[d.length]=g,e[e.length]=a[h];return d},[]);
0 ignored issues
– show
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing b to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing 0 to h using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Comprehensibility introduced by
Usage of the sequence operator is discouraged, since it may lead to obfuscated code.

The sequence or comma operator allows the inclusion of multiple expressions where only is permitted. The result of the sequence is the value of the last expression.

This operator is most often used in for statements.

Used in another places it can make code hard to read, especially when people do not realize it even exists as a seperate operator.

This check looks for usage of the sequence operator in locations where it is not necessary and could be replaced by a series of expressions or statements.

var a,b,c;

a = 1, b = 1,  c= 3;

could just as well be written as:

var a,b,c;

a = 1;
b = 1;
c = 3;

To learn more about the sequence operator, please refer to the MDN.

Loading history...
19 
return e};b.union=function(){return b.uniq(b.flatten(arguments,true))};b.intersection=b.intersect=function(a){var c=i.call(arguments,1);return b.filter(b.uniq(a),function(a){return b.every(c,function(c){return b.indexOf(c,a)>=0})})};b.difference=function(a){var c=b.flatten(i.call(arguments,1));return b.filter(a,function(a){return!b.include(c,a)})};b.zip=function(){for(var a=i.call(arguments),c=b.max(b.pluck(a,"length")),d=Array(c),e=0;e<c;e++)d[e]=b.pluck(a,""+e);return d};b.indexOf=function(a,c,
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
20 
d){if(a==null)return-1;var e;if(d)return d=b.sortedIndex(a,c),a[d]===c?d:-1;if(p&&a.indexOf===p)return a.indexOf(c);for(d=0,e=a.length;d<e;d++)if(d in a&&a[d]===c)return d;return-1};b.lastIndexOf=function(a,b){if(a==null)return-1;if(D&&a.lastIndexOf===D)return a.lastIndexOf(b);for(var d=a.length;d--;)if(d in a&&a[d]===b)return d;return-1};b.range=function(a,b,d){arguments.length<=1&&(b=a||0,a=0);for(var d=arguments[2]||1,e=Math.max(Math.ceil((b-a)/d),0),f=0,g=Array(e);f<e;)g[f++]=a,a+=d;return g};
0 ignored issues
– show
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Comprehensibility introduced by
Usage of the sequence operator is discouraged, since it may lead to obfuscated code.

The sequence or comma operator allows the inclusion of multiple expressions where only is permitted. The result of the sequence is the value of the last expression.

This operator is most often used in for statements.

Used in another places it can make code hard to read, especially when people do not realize it even exists as a seperate operator.

This check looks for usage of the sequence operator in locations where it is not necessary and could be replaced by a series of expressions or statements.

var a,b,c;

a = 1, b = 1,  c= 3;

could just as well be written as:

var a,b,c;

a = 1;
b = 1;
c = 3;

To learn more about the sequence operator, please refer to the MDN.

Loading history...
21 
var F=function(){};b.bind=function(a,c){var d,e;if(a.bind===s&&s)return s.apply(a,i.call(arguments,1));if(!b.isFunction(a))throw new TypeError;e=i.call(arguments,2);return d=function(){if(!(this instanceof d))return a.apply(c,e.concat(i.call(arguments)));F.prototype=a.prototype;var b=new F,g=a.apply(b,e.concat(i.call(arguments)));return Object(g)===g?g:b}};b.bindAll=function(a){var c=i.call(arguments,1);c.length==0&&(c=b.functions(a));j(c,function(c){a[c]=b.bind(a[c],a)});return a};b.memoize=function(a,
0 ignored issues
– show
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing c.length to 0 using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Comprehensibility introduced by
Are you sure you want to assign to d here, or did you intend to make a comparison like d === function() { if (!...ject(g) === g ? g: b; }?
Loading history...
22 
c){var d={};c||(c=b.identity);return function(){var e=c.apply(this,arguments);return b.has(d,e)?d[e]:d[e]=a.apply(this,arguments)}};b.delay=function(a,b){var d=i.call(arguments,2);return setTimeout(function(){return a.apply(a,d)},b)};b.defer=function(a){return b.delay.apply(b,[a,1].concat(i.call(arguments,1)))};b.throttle=function(a,c){var d,e,f,g,h,i=b.debounce(function(){h=g=false},c);return function(){d=this;e=arguments;var b;f||(f=setTimeout(function(){f=null;h&&a.apply(d,e);i()},c));g?h=true:
0 ignored issues
– show
Unused Code introduced by
The variable b seems to be never used. Consider removing it.
Loading history...
23 
a.apply(d,e);i();g=true}};b.debounce=function(a,b){var d;return function(){var e=this,f=arguments;clearTimeout(d);d=setTimeout(function(){d=null;a.apply(e,f)},b)}};b.once=function(a){var b=false,d;return function(){if(b)return d;b=true;return d=a.apply(this,arguments)}};b.wrap=function(a,b){return function(){var d=[a].concat(i.call(arguments,0));return b.apply(this,d)}};b.compose=function(){var a=arguments;return function(){for(var b=arguments,d=a.length-1;d>=0;d--)b=[a[d].apply(this,b)];return b[0]}};
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
24 
b.after=function(a,b){return a<=0?b():function(){if(--a<1)return b.apply(this,arguments)}};b.keys=J||function(a){if(a!==Object(a))throw new TypeError("Invalid object");var c=[],d;for(d in a)b.has(a,d)&&(c[c.length]=d);return c};b.values=function(a){return b.map(a,b.identity)};b.functions=b.methods=function(a){var c=[],d;for(d in a)b.isFunction(a[d])&&c.push(d);return c.sort()};b.extend=function(a){j(i.call(arguments,1),function(b){for(var d in b)a[d]=b[d]});return a};b.defaults=function(a){j(i.call(arguments,
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Complexity Best Practice introduced by
There is no return statement if --a < 1 is false. Are you sure this is correct? If so, consider adding return; explicitly.

This check looks for functions where a return statement is found in some execution paths, but not in all.

Consider this little piece of code

function isBig(a) {
    if (a > 5000) {
        return "yes";
    }
}

console.log(isBig(5001)); //returns yes
console.log(isBig(42)); //returns undefined

The function isBig will only return a specific value when its parameter is bigger than 5000. In any other case, it will implicitly return undefined.

This behaviour may not be what you had intended. In any case, you can add a return undefined to the other execution path to make the return value explicit.

Loading history...
Complexity introduced by
A for in loop automatically includes the property of any prototype object, consider checking the key using hasOwnProperty.

When iterating over the keys of an object, this includes not only the keys of the object, but also keys contained in the prototype of that object. It is generally a best practice to check for these keys specifically:

var someObject;
for (var key in someObject) {
    if ( ! someObject.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
        continue; // Skip keys from the prototype.
    }

    doSomethingWith(key);
}
Loading history...
25 
1),function(b){for(var d in b)a[d]==null&&(a[d]=b[d])});return a};b.clone=function(a){return!b.isObject(a)?a:b.isArray(a)?a.slice():b.extend({},a)};b.tap=function(a,b){b(a);return a};b.isEqual=function(a,b){return q(a,b,[])};b.isEmpty=function(a){if(b.isArray(a)||b.isString(a))return a.length===0;for(var c in a)if(b.has(a,c))return false;return true};b.isElement=function(a){return!!(a&&a.nodeType==1)};b.isArray=o||function(a){return l.call(a)=="[object Array]"};b.isObject=function(a){return a===Object(a)};
0 ignored issues
– show
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a.nodeType to 1 using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Best Practice introduced by
Comparing a.d to null using the == operator is not safe. Consider using === instead.
Loading history...
Complexity introduced by
A for in loop automatically includes the property of any prototype object, consider checking the key using hasOwnProperty.

When iterating over the keys of an object, this includes not only the keys of the object, but also keys contained in the prototype of that object. It is generally a best practice to check for these keys specifically:

var someObject;
for (var key in someObject) {
    if ( ! someObject.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
        continue; // Skip keys from the prototype.
    }

    doSomethingWith(key);
}
Loading history...
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
26 
b.isArguments=function(a){return l.call(a)=="[object Arguments]"};if(!b.isArguments(arguments))b.isArguments=function(a){return!(!a||!b.has(a,"callee"))};b.isFunction=function(a){return l.call(a)=="[object Function]"};b.isString=function(a){return l.call(a)=="[object String]"};b.isNumber=function(a){return l.call(a)=="[object Number]"};b.isNaN=function(a){return a!==a};b.isBoolean=function(a){return a===true||a===false||l.call(a)=="[object Boolean]"};b.isDate=function(a){return l.call(a)=="[object Date]"};
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
27 
b.isRegExp=function(a){return l.call(a)=="[object RegExp]"};b.isNull=function(a){return a===null};b.isUndefined=function(a){return a===void 0};b.has=function(a,b){return I.call(a,b)};b.noConflict=function(){r._=G;return this};b.identity=function(a){return a};b.times=function(a,b,d){for(var e=0;e<a;e++)b.call(d,e)};b.escape=function(a){return(""+a).replace(/&/g,"&amp;").replace(/</g,"&lt;").replace(/>/g,"&gt;").replace(/"/g,"&quot;").replace(/'/g,"&#x27;").replace(/\//g,"&#x2F;")};b.mixin=function(a){j(b.functions(a),
0 ignored issues
– show
Coding Style Best Practice introduced by
Curly braces around statements make for more readable code and help prevent bugs when you add further statements.

Consider adding curly braces around all statements when they are executed conditionally. This is optional if there is only one statement, but leaving them out can lead to unexpected behaviour if another statement is added later.

Consider:

if (a > 0)
    b = 42;

If you or someone else later decides to put another statement in, only the first statement will be executed.

if (a > 0)
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;

In this case the statement b = 42 will always be executed, while the logging statement will be executed conditionally.

if (a > 0) {
    console.log("a > 0");
    b = 42;
}

ensures that the proper code will be executed conditionally no matter how many statements are added or removed.

Loading history...
Coding Style introduced by
Consider using undefined instead of void(0). It is equivalent and more straightforward to read.
Loading history...
28 
function(c){K(c,b[c]=a[c])})};var L=0;b.uniqueId=function(a){var b=L++;return a?a+b:b};b.templateSettings={evaluate:/<%([\s\S]+?)%>/g,interpolate:/<%=([\s\S]+?)%>/g,escape:/<%-([\s\S]+?)%>/g};var t=/.^/,u=function(a){return a.replace(/\\\\/g,"\\").replace(/\\'/g,"'")};b.template=function(a,c){var d=b.templateSettings,d="var __p=[],print=function(){__p.push.apply(__p,arguments);};with(obj||{}){__p.push('"+a.replace(/\\/g,"\\\\").replace(/'/g,"\\'").replace(d.escape||t,function(a,b){return"',_.escape("+
0 ignored issues
– show
Comprehensibility Naming Best Practice introduced by
The variable d already seems to be declared on line 28. Consider using another variable name or omitting the var keyword.

This check looks for variables that are declared in multiple lines. There may be several reasons for this.

In the simplest case the variable name was reused by mistake. This may lead to very hard to locate bugs.

If you want to reuse a variable for another purpose, consider declaring it at or near the top of your function and just assigning to it subsequently so it is always declared.

Loading history...
29 
u(b)+"),'"}).replace(d.interpolate||t,function(a,b){return"',"+u(b)+",'"}).replace(d.evaluate||t,function(a,b){return"');"+u(b).replace(/[\r\n\t]/g," ")+";__p.push('"}).replace(/\r/g,"\\r").replace(/\n/g,"\\n").replace(/\t/g,"\\t")+"');}return __p.join('');",e=new Function("obj","_",d);return c?e(c,b):function(a){return e.call(this,a,b)}};b.chain=function(a){return b(a).chain()};var m=function(a){this._wrapped=a};b.prototype=m.prototype;var v=function(a,c){return c?b(a).chain():a},K=function(a,c){m.prototype[a]=
0 ignored issues
– show
Performance Best Practice introduced by
Using new Function() to create a function is slow and difficult to debug. Such functions do not create a closure. Consider using another way to define your function.
Loading history...
30 
function(){var a=i.call(arguments);H.call(a,this._wrapped);return v(c.apply(b,a),this._chain)}};b.mixin(b);j("pop,push,reverse,shift,sort,splice,unshift".split(","),function(a){var b=k[a];m.prototype[a]=function(){var d=this._wrapped;b.apply(d,arguments);var e=d.length;(a=="shift"||a=="splice")&&e===0&&delete d[0];return v(d,this._chain)}});j(["concat","join","slice"],function(a){var b=k[a];m.prototype[a]=function(){return v(b.apply(this._wrapped,arguments),this._chain)}});m.prototype.chain=function(){this._chain=
31 
true;return this};m.prototype.value=function(){return this._wrapped}}).call(this);
32