Issues in BlogController.php (master) - Issues in master - bantenprov/vue-blog - Measure and Improve Code Quality continuously with Scrutinizer

Issues (43)

Security Analysis no request data

Cross-Site Scripting

Cross-Site Scripting enables an attacker to inject code into the response of a web-request that is viewed by other users. It can for example be used to bypass access controls, or even to take over other users' accounts.

File Exposure

File Exposure allows an attacker to gain access to local files that he should not be able to access. These files can for example include database credentials, or other configuration files.

File Manipulation

File Manipulation enables an attacker to write custom data to files. This potentially leads to injection of arbitrary code on the server.

Object Injection

Object Injection enables an attacker to inject an object into PHP code, and can lead to arbitrary code execution, file exposure, or file manipulation attacks.

Code Injection

Code Injection enables an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the server.

Response Splitting

Response Splitting can be used to send arbitrary responses.

File Inclusion

File Inclusion enables an attacker to inject custom files into PHP's file loading mechanism, either explicitly passed to include, or for example via PHP's auto-loading mechanism.

Command Injection

Command Injection enables an attacker to inject a shell command that is execute with the privileges of the web-server. This can be used to expose sensitive data, or gain access of your server.

SQL Injection

SQL Injection enables an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL code on your database server gaining access to user data, or manipulating user data.

XPath Injection

XPath Injection enables an attacker to modify the parts of XML document that are read. If that XML document is for example used for authentication, this can lead to further vulnerabilities similar to SQL Injection.

LDAP Injection

LDAP Injection enables an attacker to inject LDAP statements potentially granting permission to run unauthorized queries, or modify content inside the LDAP tree.

Header Injection

Other Vulnerability

This category comprises other attack vectors such as manipulating the PHP runtime, loading custom extensions, freezing the runtime, or similar.

Regex Injection

Regex Injection enables an attacker to execute arbitrary code in your PHP process.

XML Injection

XML Injection enables an attacker to read files on your local filesystem including configuration files, or can be abused to freeze your web-server process.

Variable Injection

Variable Injection enables an attacker to overwrite program variables with custom data, and can lead to further vulnerabilities.

Unfortunately, the security analysis is currently not available for your project. If you are a non-commercial open-source project, please contact support to gain access.

src/Controllers/BlogController.php (31 issues)

Labels

Severity

Upgrade to new PHP Analysis Engine

These results are based on our legacy PHP analysis, consider migrating to our new PHP analysis engine instead. Learn more

<?php

namespace Bantenprov\VueBlog\Controllers;

use App\Http\Controllers\Controller;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Auth;
use Illuminate\Http\Request;
use Bantenprov\VueBlog\Models\Blog;
use Bantenprov\VueBlog\Requests\StoreBlogPost;
use Bantenprov\VueBlog\Requests\UpdateBlogPost;

class BlogController extends Controller
{
    public function index()
    {
        $articles = Blog::with('user')->latest('updated_at')->whereNull('deleted_at')->get();
        $current_user = Auth::user();
        return view('view::index', compact('articles', 'current_user'));
    }

    public function create()
    {
        $tags = NULL;
        // return response()->json([

        //     'tags' => $tags

        // ]);
        return view('view::create', compact('tags'));
    }

    public function store(StoreBlogPost $request)
    {
        $request['slug'] = str_slug($request->title, '-');
        $post = new Blog();
        $post->title = $request->title;
        $post->content = $request->content;
        $post->excerpt = $request->excerpt;
        $post->slug = str_slug($request->title, '-');
        $user = Auth::user();
        $user->posts()->save($post);


        // return response()->json([

        //     'title' => 'Success',

        //     'type'  => 'success',

        //     'message' => 'Your article has been created.'

        // ]);
        \Session::flash('flash_message', 'Your article has been created');
        return response()->json($user);
        //return redirect()->route('blog.index');

    }

    public function show(Blog $blog)

    {
        $article = $blog;
        $current_user = Auth::user();
        $id_blog  = $article->id;
        // return response()->json([

        //     'articles' => $article,

        //     'current_user' => $current_user

        // ]);
        return view('view::show', compact('article', 'current_user', 'id_blog'));
    }

    public function edit($id)

    {
        $tags = NULL;
        $article = Blog::findOrFail($id);
        $id_blog  = $id;
        // return response()->json([

        //     'articles' => $article,

        //     'tags' => $tags

        // ]);
        return view('view::edit', compact('article', 'tags', 'id_blog'));
    }

    public function update(UpdateBlogPost $request, $id)
    {
        $article = Blog::findOrFail($id);
        $article->update($request->all());
        $this->syncTags($article, $request->input('tag_list'));
        $article->save();

        // return response()->json([

        //     'title' => 'Success',

        //     'type'  => 'success',

        //     'message' => 'Your article has been updated.',

        //     'id'  => $id

        // ]);
        return response()->json($article);
        //return redirect()->route('blog.show', $id);

    }

    public function destroy($id)
    {
        // Blog::find($id)->delete();

        // return response()->json([

        //     'title' => 'Error',

        //     'type'  => 'error',

        //     'message' => 'Data deleted successfully'

        // ]);
        $hapus = Blog::destroy($id);
        // return redirect()->route('blog.index');

        return response()->json($hapus);
    }

    private function syncTags(Blog $article, $tags = [])
    {
        if (empty($tags)) {
            return;
        }

        $article->tags()->sync($tags);
    }

    private function createPost(StoreBlogPost $request)

    {
        $request['slug'] = str_slug($request->title, '-');
        $article = Auth::user()

        ->posts()
        ->save(new Blog($request->all()));
        //return response()->json($article);

        return $article;
    }

    public function getData(Request $request)
    {
        $cari = $request->get('cari');
        $id = $request->get('id');
        $current_user = Auth::user();
        if($cari){
          if($id){
            $articles = Blog::with('user')
                            ->latest('updated_at')
                            ->where('id', $id)
                            ->where('title', 'LIKE','%'.$cari.'%')
                            ->whereNull('deleted_at')
                            ->paginate(5)
                            ->appends($request->only('cari'));
          }else {
            $articles = Blog::with('user')
                            ->latest('updated_at')
                            ->where('title', 'LIKE','%'.$cari.'%')
                            ->whereNull('deleted_at')
                            ->paginate(5)
                            ->appends($request->only('cari'));
          }
        } else {
          if($id){
            $articles = Blog::with('user')
                            ->latest('updated_at')
                            ->where('id', $id)
                            ->whereNull('deleted_at')
                            ->paginate(5);
          }else {
            $articles = Blog::with('user')
                            ->latest('updated_at')
                            ->whereNull('deleted_at')
                            ->paginate(5);
          }
        }
        return response()->json([
            'articles' => $articles,
            'current_user' => $current_user
        ]);
    }
}


1		<?php
2
3		namespace Bantenprov\VueBlog\Controllers;
4
5		use App\Http\Controllers\Controller;
6		use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Auth;
7		use Illuminate\Http\Request;
8		use Bantenprov\VueBlog\Models\Blog;
9		use Bantenprov\VueBlog\Requests\StoreBlogPost;
10		use Bantenprov\VueBlog\Requests\UpdateBlogPost;
11
12		class BlogController extends Controller
13		{
14		public function index()
15		{
16		$articles = Blog::with('user')->latest('updated_at')->whereNull('deleted_at')->get();
17		$current_user = Auth::user();
18		return view('view::index', compact('articles', 'current_user'));
19		}
20
21		public function create()
22		{
23		$tags = NULL;
24		// return response()->json([
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `60%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
25		// 'tags' => $tags
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `50%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
26		// ]);
27		return view('view::create', compact('tags'));
28		}
29
30		public function store(StoreBlogPost $request)
31		{
32		$request['slug'] = str_slug($request->title, '-');
33		$post = new Blog();
34		$post->title = $request->title;
35		$post->content = $request->content;
36		$post->excerpt = $request->excerpt;
37		$post->slug = str_slug($request->title, '-');
38		$user = Auth::user();
39		$user->posts()->save($post);
		0 ignored issues – show Bug introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this The method `posts()` does not seem to exist on `object<Illuminate\Contracts\Auth\Authenticatable>`. This check looks for calls to methods that do not seem to exist on a given type. It looks for the method on the type itself as well as in inherited classes or implemented interfaces. This is most likely a typographical error or the method has been renamed. Loading history...
40
41		// return response()->json([
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `60%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
42		// 'title' => 'Success',
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
43		// 'type' => 'success',
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
44		// 'message' => 'Your article has been created.'
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `50%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
45		// ]);
46		\Session::flash('flash_message', 'Your article has been created');
47		return response()->json($user);
48		//return redirect()->route('blog.index');
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `73%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
49		}
50
51	View Code Duplication	public function show(Blog $blog)
		0 ignored issues – show Duplication introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this This method seems to be duplicated in your project. Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. Loading history...
52		{
53		$article = $blog;
54		$current_user = Auth::user();
55		$id_blog = $article->id;
56		// return response()->json([
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `60%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
57		// 'articles' => $article,
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
58		// 'current_user' => $current_user
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `50%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
59		// ]);
60		return view('view::show', compact('article', 'current_user', 'id_blog'));
61		}
62
63	View Code Duplication	public function edit($id)
		0 ignored issues – show Duplication introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this This method seems to be duplicated in your project. Duplicated code is one of the most pungent code smells. If you need to duplicate the same code in three or more different places, we strongly encourage you to look into extracting the code into a single class or operation. You can also find more detailed suggestions in the “Code” section of your repository. Loading history...
64		{
65		$tags = NULL;
66		$article = Blog::findOrFail($id);
67		$id_blog = $id;
68		// return response()->json([
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `60%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
69		// 'articles' => $article,
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
70		// 'tags' => $tags
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `50%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
71		// ]);
72		return view('view::edit', compact('article', 'tags', 'id_blog'));
73		}
74
75		public function update(UpdateBlogPost $request, $id)
76		{
77		$article = Blog::findOrFail($id);
78		$article->update($request->all());
79		$this->syncTags($article, $request->input('tag_list'));
80		$article->save();
81
82		// return response()->json([
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `60%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
83		// 'title' => 'Success',
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
84		// 'type' => 'success',
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
85		// 'message' => 'Your article has been updated.',
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
86		// 'id' => $id
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `50%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
87		// ]);
88		return response()->json($article);
89		//return redirect()->route('blog.show', $id);
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `72%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
90		}
91
92		public function destroy($id)
93		{
94		// Blog::find($id)->delete();
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `67%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
95		// return response()->json([
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `60%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
96		// 'title' => 'Error',
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
97		// 'type' => 'error',
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `58%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
98		// 'message' => 'Data deleted successfully'
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `50%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
99		// ]);
100		$hapus = Blog::destroy($id);
101		// return redirect()->route('blog.index');
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `67%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
102		return response()->json($hapus);
103		}
104
105		private function syncTags(Blog $article, $tags = [])
106		{
107		if (empty($tags)) {
108		return;
109		}
110
111		$article->tags()->sync($tags);
112		}
113
114		private function createPost(StoreBlogPost $request)
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this This method is not used, and could be removed. Loading history...
115		{
116		$request['slug'] = str_slug($request->title, '-');
117		$article = Auth::user()
		0 ignored issues – show Bug introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this The method `posts()` does not seem to exist on `object<Illuminate\Contracts\Auth\Authenticatable>`. This check looks for calls to methods that do not seem to exist on a given type. It looks for the method on the type itself as well as in inherited classes or implemented interfaces. This is most likely a typographical error or the method has been renamed. Loading history...
118		->posts()
119		->save(new Blog($request->all()));
120		//return response()->json($article);
		0 ignored issues – show Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced 2018-03-01 18:09 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report Show Similar Issues like this `73%` of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging? Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it. The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production. This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them. Loading history...
121		return $article;
122		}
123
124		public function getData(Request $request)
125		{
126		$cari = $request->get('cari');
127		$id = $request->get('id');
128		$current_user = Auth::user();
129		if($cari){
130		if($id){
131		$articles = Blog::with('user')
132		->latest('updated_at')
133		->where('id', $id)
134		->where('title', 'LIKE','%'.$cari.'%')
135		->whereNull('deleted_at')
136		->paginate(5)
137		->appends($request->only('cari'));
138		}else {
139		$articles = Blog::with('user')
140		->latest('updated_at')
141		->where('title', 'LIKE','%'.$cari.'%')
142		->whereNull('deleted_at')
143		->paginate(5)
144		->appends($request->only('cari'));
145		}
146		} else {
147		if($id){
148		$articles = Blog::with('user')
149		->latest('updated_at')
150		->where('id', $id)
151		->whereNull('deleted_at')
152		->paginate(5);
153		}else {
154		$articles = Blog::with('user')
155		->latest('updated_at')
156		->whereNull('deleted_at')
157		->paginate(5);
158		}
159		}
160		return response()->json([
161		'articles' => $articles,
162		'current_user' => $current_user
163		]);
164		}
165		}
166

bantenprov / vue-blog

Issues (43)

Security Analysis no request data

src/Controllers/BlogController.php (31 issues)

Labels

Severity

Introduced By

Upgrade to new PHP Analysis Engine

Duplication Side-by-Side

Filter issues like