amarkal /
amarkal-settings
These results are based on our legacy PHP analysis, consider migrating to our new PHP analysis engine instead. Learn more
| 1 | <?php |
||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | namespace Amarkal\Settings; |
||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | class RequestHandler |
||
| 6 | { |
||
| 7 | /** |
||
| 8 | * @var Singleton The reference to *Singleton* instance of this class |
||
| 9 | */ |
||
| 10 | private static $instance; |
||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | private $request_data = array(); |
||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | const NONCE_ACTION = 'amarkal_settings'; |
||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | /** |
||
| 17 | * Returns the *Singleton* instance of this class. |
||
| 18 | * |
||
| 19 | * @return Singleton The *Singleton* instance. |
||
| 20 | */ |
||
| 21 | public static function get_instance() |
||
| 22 | { |
||
| 23 | if( null === static::$instance ) |
||
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
|
|||
| 24 | { |
||
| 25 | static::$instance = new static(); |
||
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
It seems like
new static() of type this<Amarkal\Settings\RequestHandler> is incompatible with the declared type object<Amarkal\Settings\Singleton> of property $instance.
Our type inference engine has found an assignment to a property that is incompatible with the declared type of that property. Either this assignment is in error or the assigned type should be added to the documentation/type hint for that property.. Loading history...
Since
$instance is declared private, accessing it with static will lead to errors in possible sub-classes; consider using self, or increasing the visibility of $instance to at least protected.
Let’s assume you have a class which uses late-static binding: class YourClass
{
private static $someVariable;
public static function getSomeVariable()
{
return static::$someVariable;
}
}
The code above will run fine in your PHP runtime. However, if you now create a
sub-class and call the class YourSubClass extends YourClass { }
YourSubClass::getSomeVariable(); // Will cause an access error.
In the case above, it makes sense to update class SomeClass
{
private static $someVariable;
public static function getSomeVariable()
{
return self::$someVariable; // self works fine with private.
}
}
Loading history...
|
|||
| 26 | } |
||
| 27 | return static::$instance; |
||
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
Since
$instance is declared private, accessing it with static will lead to errors in possible sub-classes; consider using self, or increasing the visibility of $instance to at least protected.
Let’s assume you have a class which uses late-static binding: class YourClass
{
private static $someVariable;
public static function getSomeVariable()
{
return static::$someVariable;
}
}
The code above will run fine in your PHP runtime. However, if you now create a
sub-class and call the class YourSubClass extends YourClass { }
YourSubClass::getSomeVariable(); // Will cause an access error.
In the case above, it makes sense to update class SomeClass
{
private static $someVariable;
public static function getSomeVariable()
{
return self::$someVariable; // self works fine with private.
}
}
Loading history...
The expression
static::$instance; of type Amarkal\Settings\Request...rkal\Settings\Singleton adds the type Amarkal\Settings\RequestHandler to the return on line 27 which is incompatible with the return type documented by Amarkal\Settings\RequestHandler::get_instance of type Amarkal\Settings\Singleton.
Loading history...
|
|||
| 28 | } |
||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | public function init() |
||
| 31 | { |
||
| 32 | \add_action('wp_ajax_amarkal_settings_save', array( $this, 'action_save')); |
||
| 33 | \add_action('wp_ajax_amarkal_settings_reset_all', array( $this, 'action_reset_all')); |
||
| 34 | \add_action('wp_ajax_amarkal_settings_reset_section', array( $this, 'action_reset_section')); |
||
| 35 | } |
||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | public function action_save() |
||
| 38 | { |
||
| 39 | $this->set_request_data(); |
||
| 40 | $settings_page = $this->get_request_settings_page(); |
||
| 41 | |||
| 42 | \wp_send_json($settings_page->update($this->request_data)); |
||
| 43 | } |
||
| 44 | |||
| 45 | public function action_reset_all() |
||
| 46 | { |
||
| 47 | $this->set_request_data(); |
||
| 48 | $settings_page = $this->get_request_settings_page(); |
||
| 49 | |||
| 50 | \wp_send_json($settings_page->reset()); |
||
| 51 | } |
||
| 52 | |||
| 53 | public function action_reset_section() |
||
| 54 | { |
||
| 55 | $this->set_request_data(); |
||
| 56 | $settings_page = $this->get_request_settings_page(); |
||
| 57 | $section = $this->request_data['_amarkal_settings_section']; |
||
| 58 | |||
| 59 | \wp_send_json($settings_page->reset_section($section)); |
||
| 60 | } |
||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | private function get_request_settings_page() |
||
| 63 | { |
||
| 64 | $manager = Manager::get_instance(); |
||
| 65 | $slug = $this->request_data['_amarkal_settings_slug']; |
||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | return $manager->get_settings_page($slug); |
||
| 68 | } |
||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | private function set_request_data() |
||
| 71 | { |
||
| 72 | $this->request_data = filter_input(INPUT_POST,'data',FILTER_DEFAULT,FILTER_REQUIRE_ARRAY); |
||
|
0 ignored issues
–
show
It seems like
filter_input(INPUT_POST,..., FILTER_REQUIRE_ARRAY) of type * is incompatible with the declared type array of property $request_data.
Our type inference engine has found an assignment to a property that is incompatible with the declared type of that property. Either this assignment is in error or the assigned type should be added to the documentation/type hint for that property.. Loading history...
|
|||
| 73 | $nonce = $this->request_data['_amarkal_settings_nonce']; |
||
| 74 | |||
| 75 | if( !isset( $nonce ) || |
||
| 76 | !\wp_verify_nonce($nonce, self::NONCE_ACTION) ) |
||
| 77 | { |
||
| 78 | \wp_send_json(array( |
||
| 79 | 'values' => array(), |
||
| 80 | 'errors' => array( |
||
| 81 | 'Your nonce did not verify' |
||
| 82 | ) |
||
| 83 | )); |
||
| 84 | } |
||
| 85 | } |
||
| 86 | } |
Let’s assume you have a class which uses late-static binding:
The code above will run fine in your PHP runtime. However, if you now create a sub-class and call the
getSomeVariable()on that sub-class, you will receive a runtime error:In the case above, it makes sense to update
SomeClassto useselfinstead: