|
1
|
|
|
"""Module to test the Path class.""" |
|
2
|
|
|
import sys |
|
3
|
|
|
from unittest import TestCase |
|
4
|
|
|
from unittest.mock import patch, Mock |
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
from kytos.core.common import EntityStatus |
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
# pylint: disable=wrong-import-position |
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
sys.path.insert(0, "/var/lib/kytos/napps/..") |
|
11
|
|
|
# pylint: enable=wrong-import-position |
|
12
|
|
|
from napps.kytos.mef_eline.exceptions import InvalidPath # NOQA pycodestyle |
|
13
|
|
|
from napps.kytos.mef_eline.models import Path # NOQA pycodestyle |
|
14
|
|
|
from napps.kytos.mef_eline.tests.helpers import ( |
|
15
|
|
|
MockResponse, |
|
16
|
|
|
get_link_mocked, |
|
17
|
|
|
get_mocked_requests, |
|
18
|
|
|
) # NOQA pycodestyle |
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
class TestPath(TestCase): |
|
22
|
|
|
"""Class to test path methods.""" |
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
def test_is_affected_by_link_1(self): |
|
25
|
|
|
"""Test method is affected by link.""" |
|
26
|
|
|
path = Path() |
|
27
|
|
|
self.assertIs(path.is_affected_by_link(), False) |
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
def test_link_affected_by_interface_1(self): |
|
30
|
|
|
"""Test method to get the link using an interface.""" |
|
31
|
|
|
link1 = Mock() |
|
32
|
|
|
link1.endpoint_a = "a" |
|
33
|
|
|
link1.endpoint_b = "b" |
|
34
|
|
|
link2 = Mock() |
|
35
|
|
|
link2.endpoint_a = "c" |
|
36
|
|
|
link2.endpoint_b = "d" |
|
37
|
|
|
path = Path([link1, link2]) |
|
38
|
|
|
self.assertIsNone(path.link_affected_by_interface()) |
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
def test_link_affected_by_interface_2(self): |
|
41
|
|
|
"""Test method to get the link using an interface.""" |
|
42
|
|
|
link1 = Mock() |
|
43
|
|
|
link1.endpoint_a = "a" |
|
44
|
|
|
link1.endpoint_b = "b" |
|
45
|
|
|
link2 = Mock() |
|
46
|
|
|
link2.endpoint_a = "c" |
|
47
|
|
|
link2.endpoint_b = "d" |
|
48
|
|
|
path = Path([link1, link2]) |
|
49
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(path.link_affected_by_interface("a"), link1) |
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
def test_status_case_1(self): |
|
52
|
|
|
"""Test if empty link is DISABLED.""" |
|
53
|
|
|
current_path = Path() |
|
54
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(current_path.status, EntityStatus.DISABLED) |
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
@patch("requests.get", side_effect=get_mocked_requests) |
|
57
|
|
|
def test_status_case_2(self, requests_mocked): |
|
58
|
|
|
# pylint: disable=unused-argument |
|
59
|
|
|
"""Test if link status is DOWN.""" |
|
60
|
|
|
link1 = get_link_mocked() |
|
61
|
|
|
link2 = get_link_mocked() |
|
62
|
|
|
link1.id = "def" |
|
63
|
|
|
link2.id = "abc" |
|
64
|
|
|
links = [link1, link2] |
|
65
|
|
|
current_path = Path(links) |
|
66
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(current_path.status, EntityStatus.DOWN) |
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
def test_status_case_3(self): |
|
69
|
|
|
"""Test if link status is DISABLED.""" |
|
70
|
|
|
links = [] |
|
71
|
|
|
current_path = Path(links) |
|
72
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(current_path.status, EntityStatus.DISABLED) |
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
# This method will be used by the mock to replace requests.get |
|
75
|
|
|
def _mocked_requests_get_status_case_4(self): |
|
76
|
|
|
# pylint: disable=no-self-use |
|
77
|
|
|
return MockResponse( |
|
78
|
|
|
{ |
|
79
|
|
|
"links": { |
|
80
|
|
|
"abc": {"active": True, "enabled": True}, |
|
81
|
|
|
"def": {"active": True, "enabled": True}, |
|
82
|
|
|
} |
|
83
|
|
|
}, |
|
84
|
|
|
200, |
|
85
|
|
|
) |
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
@patch("requests.get", side_effect=_mocked_requests_get_status_case_4) |
|
88
|
|
|
def test_status_case_4(self, requests_mocked): |
|
89
|
|
|
# pylint: disable=unused-argument |
|
90
|
|
|
"""Test if link status is UP.""" |
|
91
|
|
|
link1 = get_link_mocked() |
|
92
|
|
|
link2 = get_link_mocked() |
|
93
|
|
|
link1.id = "def" |
|
94
|
|
|
link2.id = "abc" |
|
95
|
|
|
links = [link1, link2] |
|
96
|
|
|
current_path = Path(links) |
|
97
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(current_path.status, EntityStatus.UP) |
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
# This method will be used by the mock to replace requests.get |
|
100
|
|
|
def _mocked_requests_get_status_case_5(self): |
|
101
|
|
|
# pylint: disable=no-self-use |
|
102
|
|
|
return MockResponse( |
|
103
|
|
|
{ |
|
104
|
|
|
"links": { |
|
105
|
|
|
"abc": {"active": True, "enabled": True}, |
|
106
|
|
|
"def": {"active": False, "enabled": False}, |
|
107
|
|
|
} |
|
108
|
|
|
}, |
|
109
|
|
|
200, |
|
110
|
|
|
) |
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
@patch("requests.get", side_effect=_mocked_requests_get_status_case_5) |
|
113
|
|
|
def test_status_case_5(self, requests_mocked): |
|
114
|
|
|
# pylint: disable=unused-argument |
|
115
|
|
|
"""Test if link status is UP.""" |
|
116
|
|
|
link1 = get_link_mocked() |
|
117
|
|
|
link2 = get_link_mocked() |
|
118
|
|
|
link1.id = "def" |
|
119
|
|
|
link2.id = "abc" |
|
120
|
|
|
links = [link1, link2] |
|
121
|
|
|
current_path = Path(links) |
|
122
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(current_path.status, EntityStatus.DISABLED) |
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
# This method will be used by the mock to replace requests.get |
|
125
|
|
|
def _mocked_requests_get_status_case_6(self): |
|
126
|
|
|
# pylint: disable=no-self-use |
|
127
|
|
|
return MockResponse( |
|
128
|
|
|
{ |
|
129
|
|
|
"links": { |
|
130
|
|
|
"abc": {"active": False, "enabled": False}, |
|
131
|
|
|
"def": {"active": False, "enabled": True}, |
|
132
|
|
|
} |
|
133
|
|
|
}, |
|
134
|
|
|
200, |
|
135
|
|
|
) |
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
@patch("requests.get", side_effect=_mocked_requests_get_status_case_6) |
|
138
|
|
|
def test_status_case_6(self, requests_mocked): |
|
139
|
|
|
# pylint: disable=unused-argument |
|
140
|
|
|
"""Test if link status is UP.""" |
|
141
|
|
|
link1 = get_link_mocked() |
|
142
|
|
|
link2 = get_link_mocked() |
|
143
|
|
|
link1.id = "def" |
|
144
|
|
|
link2.id = "abc" |
|
145
|
|
|
links = [link1, link2] |
|
146
|
|
|
current_path = Path(links) |
|
147
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(current_path.status, EntityStatus.DISABLED) |
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
def test_compare_same_paths(self): |
|
150
|
|
|
"""Test compare paths with same links.""" |
|
151
|
|
|
links = [ |
|
152
|
|
|
get_link_mocked( |
|
153
|
|
|
endpoint_a_port=9, endpoint_b_port=10, metadata={"s_vlan": 5} |
|
154
|
|
|
), |
|
155
|
|
|
get_link_mocked( |
|
156
|
|
|
endpoint_a_port=11, endpoint_b_port=12, metadata={"s_vlan": 6} |
|
157
|
|
|
), |
|
158
|
|
|
] |
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
path_1 = Path(links) |
|
161
|
|
|
path_2 = Path(links) |
|
162
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(path_1, path_2) |
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
def test_compare_different_paths(self): |
|
165
|
|
|
"""Test compare paths with different links.""" |
|
166
|
|
|
links_1 = [ |
|
167
|
|
|
get_link_mocked( |
|
168
|
|
|
endpoint_a_port=9, endpoint_b_port=10, metadata={"s_vlan": 5} |
|
169
|
|
|
), |
|
170
|
|
|
get_link_mocked( |
|
171
|
|
|
endpoint_a_port=11, endpoint_b_port=12, metadata={"s_vlan": 6} |
|
172
|
|
|
), |
|
173
|
|
|
] |
|
174
|
|
|
links_2 = [ |
|
175
|
|
|
get_link_mocked( |
|
176
|
|
|
endpoint_a_port=12, endpoint_b_port=11, metadata={"s_vlan": 5} |
|
177
|
|
|
), |
|
178
|
|
|
get_link_mocked( |
|
179
|
|
|
endpoint_a_port=14, endpoint_b_port=16, metadata={"s_vlan": 11} |
|
180
|
|
|
), |
|
181
|
|
|
] |
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
path_1 = Path(links_1) |
|
184
|
|
|
path_2 = Path(links_2) |
|
185
|
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(path_1, path_2) |
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
def test_as_dict(self): |
|
188
|
|
|
"""Test path as dict.""" |
|
189
|
|
|
links = [ |
|
190
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(link_dict={"id": 3}), |
|
191
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(link_dict={"id": 2}), |
|
192
|
|
|
] |
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
current_path = Path(links) |
|
195
|
|
|
expected_dict = [{"id": 3}, {"id": 2}] |
|
196
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(expected_dict, current_path.as_dict()) |
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
def test_is_valid(self): |
|
199
|
|
|
"""Test is_valid method.""" |
|
200
|
|
|
switch1 = "00:00:00:00:00:00:00:01" |
|
201
|
|
|
switch2 = "00:00:00:00:00:00:00:02" |
|
202
|
|
|
switch3 = "00:00:00:00:00:00:00:03" |
|
203
|
|
|
switch4 = "00:00:00:00:00:00:00:04" |
|
204
|
|
|
switch5 = "00:00:00:00:00:00:00:05" |
|
205
|
|
|
switch6 = "00:00:00:00:00:00:00:06" |
|
206
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
links1 = [ |
|
208
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(switch_a=switch1, switch_b=switch2), |
|
209
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(switch_a=switch2, switch_b=switch3), |
|
210
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(switch_a=switch3, switch_b=switch4), |
|
211
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(switch_a=switch4, switch_b=switch5), |
|
212
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(switch_a=switch5, switch_b=switch6), |
|
213
|
|
|
] |
|
214
|
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
links2 = [ |
|
216
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(switch_a=switch1, switch_b=switch2), |
|
217
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(switch_a=switch3, switch_b=switch2), |
|
218
|
|
|
get_link_mocked(switch_a=switch3, switch_b=switch4), |
|
219
|
|
|
] |
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
for links, switch_a, switch_z, expected in ( |
|
222
|
|
|
(links1, switch1, switch6, True), |
|
223
|
|
|
(links2, switch1, switch4, False), |
|
224
|
|
|
(links1, switch2, switch6, False), |
|
225
|
|
|
): |
|
226
|
|
|
with self.subTest( |
|
227
|
|
|
links=links, |
|
228
|
|
|
switch_a=switch_a, |
|
229
|
|
|
switch_z=switch_z, |
|
230
|
|
|
expected=expected, |
|
231
|
|
|
): |
|
232
|
|
|
path = Path(links) |
|
233
|
|
|
if expected: |
|
234
|
|
|
self.assertEqual( |
|
235
|
|
|
path.is_valid(switch_a, switch_z), expected |
|
236
|
|
|
) |
|
237
|
|
|
else: |
|
238
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(InvalidPath): |
|
239
|
|
|
path.is_valid(switch_a, switch_z) |
|
240
|
|
|
|