The return type of return array(new \Twig_F...($entity); }, $this))); (Twig_Function[]) is incompatible with the return type declared by the interface Twig_ExtensionInterface::getFunctions of type Twig_SimpleFunction[].
If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the
type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method.
This is more formally defined by the
Lizkov substitution principle,
and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance
of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the
SOLID principles
for object oriented design.
Our function my_function expects a Post object, and outputs the author
of the post. The base class Post returns a simple string and outputting a
simple string will work just fine. However, the child class BlogPost which
is a sub-type of Post instead decided to return an object, and is
therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a BlogPost were passed to
my_function, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the
strtoupper call in its body.
Loading history...
40
new \Twig_Function('table_name', \Closure::bind(function($entity) {
The call to Twig_Function::__construct() has too many arguments starting with \Closure::bind(function ...ame($entity); }, $this).
This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions.
If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue.
If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the
check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase
where this has been known to happen is Wordpress.
In this case you can add the @ignorePhpDoc
annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored.
The class Twig_Function has been deprecated with message: since 1.12 (to be removed in 2.0)
This class, trait or interface has been deprecated. The supplier of the file has supplied an explanatory message.
The explanatory message should give you some clue as to whether and when the type will be
removed from the class and what other constant to use instead.
The return type of return array(new \Twig_F...($entity); }, $this))); (Twig_Filter[]) is incompatible with the return type declared by the interface Twig_ExtensionInterface::getFilters of type Twig_SimpleFilter[].
If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the
type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method.
This is more formally defined by the
Lizkov substitution principle,
and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance
of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the
SOLID principles
for object oriented design.
Our function my_function expects a Post object, and outputs the author
of the post. The base class Post returns a simple string and outputting a
simple string will work just fine. However, the child class BlogPost which
is a sub-type of Post instead decided to return an object, and is
therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a BlogPost were passed to
my_function, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the
strtoupper call in its body.
Loading history...
49
new \Twig_Filter('table_name', \Closure::bind(function($entity) {
The call to Twig_Filter::__construct() has too many arguments starting with \Closure::bind(function ...ame($entity); }, $this).
This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions.
If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue.
If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the
check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase
where this has been known to happen is Wordpress.
In this case you can add the @ignorePhpDoc
annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored.
The class Twig_Filter has been deprecated with message: since 1.12 (to be removed in 2.0)
This class, trait or interface has been deprecated. The supplier of the file has supplied an explanatory message.
The explanatory message should give you some clue as to whether and when the type will be
removed from the class and what other constant to use instead.
If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method. This is more formally defined by the Lizkov substitution principle, and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the SOLID principles for object oriented design.
Let’s take a look at an example:
Our function
my_function
expects aPost
object, and outputs the author of the post. The base classPost
returns a simple string and outputting a simple string will work just fine. However, the child classBlogPost
which is a sub-type ofPost
instead decided to return anobject
, and is therefore violating the SOLID principles. If aBlogPost
were passed tomy_function
, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing thestrtoupper
call in its body.