UrlStorage   A
last analyzed

Complexity

Total Complexity 6

Size/Duplication

Total Lines 103
Duplicated Lines 0 %

Coupling/Cohesion

Components 1
Dependencies 0

Importance

Changes 0
Metric Value
dl 0
loc 103
rs 10
c 0
b 0
f 0
wmc 6
lcom 1
cbo 0

3 Methods

Rating   Name   Duplication   Size   Complexity  
A __construct() 0 4 1
A route() 0 11 2
A url() 0 16 3
1
<?php
2
3
/**
4
 * This file is part of GitterBot package.
5
 *
6
 * @author Serafim <[email protected]>
7
 * @date 24.09.2015 00:00
8
 *
9
 * For the full copyright and license information, please view the LICENSE
10
 * file that was distributed with this source code.
11
 */
12
13
namespace Interfaces\Gitter\Http;
14
15
/**
16
 * @TODO Перенести в роуты
17
 *
18
 * Class UrlStorage
19
 */
20
class UrlStorage
21
{
22
    /**
23
     * @var string
24
     */
25
    protected $token;
26
27
    /**
28
     * @var array
29
     */
30
    protected static $routes = [
31
        /* ---------------------
32
         *        Streams
33
         * --------------------- */
34
        'events'         => 'https://stream.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}/events',
35
        'messages'       => 'https://stream.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}/chatMessages',
36
37
        /* ---------------------
38
         *       Messages
39
         * --------------------- */
40
        // Additional arguments: limit, afterId, beforeId, skip
41
        'message.list'   => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}/chatMessages',
42
        // POST: {"text": "message text"}
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
56% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
43
        'message.send'   => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}/chatMessages',
44
        // PUT: {"text": "new text"}
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
56% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
45
        'message.update' => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}/chatMessages/{messageId}',
46
47
48
        /* ---------------------
49
         *        Rooms
50
         * --------------------- */
51
        'room.list'      => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/rooms',
52
        'room.info'      => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}',
53
        'room.users'     => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}/users',
54
        'room.channels'  => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}/channels',
55
        // POST: {"uri": "username/repo"}
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
56% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
56
        'room.join'      => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/rooms/{roomId}',
57
58
59
        /* ---------------------
60
         *          User
61
         * --------------------- */
62
        'user'           => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/user/{userId}',
63
        'user.current'   => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/user',
64
        'user.rooms'     => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/user/{userId}/rooms',
65
        'user.orgs'      => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/user/{userId}/orgs',
66
        'user.repos'     => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/user/{userId}/repos',
67
        'user.channels'  => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/user/{userId}/channels',
68
        // POST: {"chat": [chatId, chatId]}
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
50% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
69
        'message.unread' => 'https://api.gitter.im/v1/user/{userId}/rooms/{roomId}/unreadItems',
70
    ];
71
72
73
    /**
74
     * @param string $token
75
     */
76
    public function __construct($token)
77
    {
78
        $this->token = $token;
79
    }
80
81
82
    /**
83
     * @param $name
84
     * @param array $args
85
     * @return mixed|string
86
     * @throws \InvalidArgumentException
87
     */
88
    public function route($name, array $args = []): string
89
    {
90
        if (!array_key_exists($name, static::$routes)) {
91
            $message = sprintf('%s route not found.', $name);
92
            throw new \InvalidArgumentException($message);
93
        }
94
95
        $args['access_token'] = $this->token;
96
97
        return $this->url(static::$routes[$name], $args);
98
    }
99
100
101
    /**
102
     * @param $url
103
     * @param array $args
104
     * @return mixed|string
105
     */
106
    public function url($url, array $args = []): string
107
    {
108
        $url .= '?';
109
110
        foreach ($args as $key => $value) {
111
            $value = urlencode($value);
112
            $search = sprintf('{%s}', $key);
113
114
            if (!str_contains($url, $search)) {
115
                $url .= sprintf('&%s=%s', $key, $value);
116
            }
117
            $url = str_replace($search, $value, $url);
118
        }
119
120
        return $url;
121
    }
122
}
123