QuantityFormatterTest::getQuantityFormatter() - Code Metrics - Inspection of "[WIP] Factor BoundedQuantityValue out of QuantityV..." - DataValues/Number - Measure and Improve Code Quality continuously with Scrutinizer

Completed

Push — BoundedQuantityValue ( 1533af )

by Daniel

created 2016-06-23 15:21 UTC

QuantityFormatterTest::getQuantityFormatter() A

↳ Parent: QuantityFormatterTest

Complexity

Conditions	2
Paths	1

Size

Total Lines	18
Code Lines	13

Duplication

Lines	0
Ratio	0 %

Importance

Changes	1
Bugs	0	Features	1

Metric	Value
c	1
b	0
f	1
dl	0
loc	18
rs	9.4285
cc	2
eloc	13
nc	1
nop	2

<?php

namespace ValueFormatters\Test;

use DataValues\QuantityValue;
use ValueFormatters\DecimalFormatter;
use ValueFormatters\FormatterOptions;
use ValueFormatters\QuantityFormatter;

/**
 * @covers ValueFormatters\QuantityFormatter
 *
 * @group ValueFormatters
 * @group DataValueExtensions
 *
 * @license GPL-2.0+
 * @author Daniel Kinzler
 */
class QuantityFormatterTest extends ValueFormatterTestBase {

	/**
	 * @deprecated since DataValues Interfaces 0.2, just use getInstance.
	 */
	protected function getFormatterClass() {
		throw new \LogicException( 'Should not be called, use getInstance' );
	}

	/**
	 * @see ValueFormatterTestBase::getInstance
	 *
	 * @param FormatterOptions|null $options
	 *
	 * @return QuantityFormatter
	 */
	protected function getInstance( FormatterOptions $options = null ) {
		return $this->getQuantityFormatter( $options );
	}

	/**
	 * @param FormatterOptions|null $options
	 * @param string|null $quantityWithUnitFormat
	 *
	 * @return QuantityFormatter
	 */
	private function getQuantityFormatter(
		FormatterOptions $options = null,
		$quantityWithUnitFormat = null
	) {
		$vocabularyUriFormatter = $this->getMock( 'ValueFormatters\ValueFormatter' );
		$vocabularyUriFormatter->expects( $this->any() )
			->method( 'format' )
			->will( $this->returnCallback( function( $unit ) {
				return $unit === '1' ? null : $unit;
			} ) );

		return new QuantityFormatter(
			$options,
			new DecimalFormatter( $options ),
			$vocabularyUriFormatter,
			$quantityWithUnitFormat
		);
	}

	/**
	 * @see ValueFormatterTestBase::validProvider
	 */
	public function validProvider() {
		$noMargin = new FormatterOptions( array(
			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => false
		) );

		$withMargin = new FormatterOptions( array(
			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => true
		) );

		$noRounding = new FormatterOptions( array(
			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => true,
			QuantityFormatter::OPT_APPLY_ROUNDING => false
		) );

		$exactRounding = new FormatterOptions( array(
			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => true,
			QuantityFormatter::OPT_APPLY_ROUNDING => -2
		) );

		$forceSign = new FormatterOptions( array(
			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => false,
			DecimalFormatter::OPT_FORCE_SIGN => true,
		) );

		$noUnit = new FormatterOptions( array(
			QuantityFormatter::OPT_APPLY_UNIT => false,
		) );

		return array(
class Author {
    private $name;

    public function __construct($name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }

    public function getName() {
        return $this->name;
    }
}

abstract class Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return 'Johannes';
    }
}

class BlogPost extends Post {
    public function getAuthor() {
        return new Author('Johannes');
    }
}

class ForumPost extends Post { /* ... */ }

function my_function(Post $post) {
    echo strtoupper($post->getAuthor());
}
			'+0/nm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0', '1', '+0', '+0' ), '0', $noMargin ),

			'+0/wm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0', '1', '+0', '+0' ), '0', $withMargin ),


			'+0.0/nm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0.0', '°', '+0.1', '-0.1' ), '0.0 °', $noMargin ),

			'+0.0/wm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0.0', '°', '+0.1', '-0.1' ), '0.0±0.1 °', $withMargin ),

			'+0.0/xr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0.0', '°', '+0.1', '-0.1' ), '0.00±0.10 °', $exactRounding ),


			'-1205/nm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1200 m', $noMargin ),

			'-1205/wm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1200±100 m', $withMargin ),

			'-1205/nr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1205±100 m', $noRounding ),

			'-1205/xr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1205.00±100.00 m', $exactRounding ),

			'-1205/nu' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1200±100', $noUnit ),


			'+3.025/nm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.025', '1', '+3.02744', '+3.0211' ), '3.025', $noMargin ),

			'+3.025/wm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.025', '1', '+3.02744', '+3.0211' ), '3.025±0.004', $withMargin ),

			'+3.025/xr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.025', '1', '+3.02744', '+3.0211' ), '3.03', $exactRounding ), // TODO: never round to 0! See bug #56892


			'+3.125/nr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.125', '1', '+3.2', '+3.0' ), '3.125±0.125', $noRounding ),

			'+3.125/xr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.125', '1', '+3.2', '+3.0' ), '3.13±0.13', $exactRounding ),


			'+3.125/fs' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.125', '1', '+3.2', '+3.0' ), '+3.13', $forceSign ),

		);
	}

	public function testFormatWithFormatString() {
		$formatter = $this->getQuantityFormatter( null, '<$2>$1' );
		$value = QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+5', 'USD' );
		$formatted = $formatter->format( $value );
		$this->assertSame( '<USD>5', $formatted );
	}

}


1			<?php
2
3			namespace ValueFormatters\Test;
4
5			use DataValues\QuantityValue;
6			use ValueFormatters\DecimalFormatter;
7			use ValueFormatters\FormatterOptions;
8			use ValueFormatters\QuantityFormatter;
9
10			/**
11			* @covers ValueFormatters\QuantityFormatter
12			*
13			* @group ValueFormatters
14			* @group DataValueExtensions
15			*
16			* @license GPL-2.0+
17			* @author Daniel Kinzler
18			*/
19			class QuantityFormatterTest extends ValueFormatterTestBase {
20
21			/**
22			* @deprecated since DataValues Interfaces 0.2, just use getInstance.
23			*/
24			protected function getFormatterClass() {
25			throw new \LogicException( 'Should not be called, use getInstance' );
26			}
27
28			/**
29			* @see ValueFormatterTestBase::getInstance
30			*
31			* @param FormatterOptions\|null $options
32			*
33			* @return QuantityFormatter
34			*/
35			protected function getInstance( FormatterOptions $options = null ) {
36			return $this->getQuantityFormatter( $options );
37			}
38
39			/**
40			* @param FormatterOptions\|null $options
41			* @param string\|null $quantityWithUnitFormat
42			*
43			* @return QuantityFormatter
44			*/
45			private function getQuantityFormatter(
46			FormatterOptions $options = null,
47			$quantityWithUnitFormat = null
48			) {
49			$vocabularyUriFormatter = $this->getMock( 'ValueFormatters\ValueFormatter' );
50			$vocabularyUriFormatter->expects( $this->any() )
51			->method( 'format' )
52			->will( $this->returnCallback( function( $unit ) {
53			return $unit === '1' ? null : $unit;
54			} ) );
55
56			return new QuantityFormatter(
57			$options,
58			new DecimalFormatter( $options ),
59			$vocabularyUriFormatter,
60			$quantityWithUnitFormat
61			);
62			}
63
64			/**
65			* @see ValueFormatterTestBase::validProvider
66			*/
67			public function validProvider() {
68			$noMargin = new FormatterOptions( array(
69			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => false
70			) );
71
72			$withMargin = new FormatterOptions( array(
73			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => true
74			) );
75
76			$noRounding = new FormatterOptions( array(
77			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => true,
78			QuantityFormatter::OPT_APPLY_ROUNDING => false
79			) );
80
81			$exactRounding = new FormatterOptions( array(
82			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => true,
83			QuantityFormatter::OPT_APPLY_ROUNDING => -2
84			) );
85
86			$forceSign = new FormatterOptions( array(
87			QuantityFormatter::OPT_SHOW_UNCERTAINTY_MARGIN => false,
88			DecimalFormatter::OPT_FORCE_SIGN => true,
89			) );
90
91			$noUnit = new FormatterOptions( array(
92			QuantityFormatter::OPT_APPLY_UNIT => false,
93			) );
94
95			return array(
			0 ignored issues – show Bug Best Practice introduced 2016-02-23 14:41 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The return type of `return array('+0/nm' => ... '+3.13', $forceSign));` (`array<string,array<strin...ters\FormatterOptions>>`) is incompatible with the return type declared by the abstract method `ValueFormatters\Test\Val...TestBase::validProvider` of type `array[]`. If you return a value from a function or method, it should be a sub-type of the type that is given by the parent type f.e. an interface, or abstract method. This is more formally defined by the Lizkov substitution principle, and guarantees that classes that depend on the parent type can use any instance of a child type interchangably. This principle also belongs to the SOLID principles for object oriented design. Let’s take a look at an example: class Author { private $name; public function __construct($name) { $this->name = $name; } public function getName() { return $this->name; } } abstract class Post { public function getAuthor() { return 'Johannes'; } } class BlogPost extends Post { public function getAuthor() { return new Author('Johannes'); } } class ForumPost extends Post { /* ... */ } function my_function(Post $post) { echo strtoupper($post->getAuthor()); } Our function `my_function` expects a `Post` object, and outputs the author of the post. The base class `Post` returns a simple string and outputting a simple string will work just fine. However, the child class `BlogPost` which is a sub-type of `Post` instead decided to return an `object`, and is therefore violating the SOLID principles. If a `BlogPost` were passed to `my_function`, PHP would not complain, but ultimately fail when executing the `strtoupper` call in its body. Loading history...
96			'+0/nm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0', '1', '+0', '+0' ), '0', $noMargin ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+0'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
97			'+0/wm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0', '1', '+0', '+0' ), '0', $withMargin ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+0'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
98
99			'+0.0/nm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0.0', '°', '+0.1', '-0.1' ), '0.0 °', $noMargin ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+0.1'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
100			'+0.0/wm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0.0', '°', '+0.1', '-0.1' ), '0.0±0.1 °', $withMargin ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+0.1'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
101			'+0.0/xr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+0.0', '°', '+0.1', '-0.1' ), '0.00±0.10 °', $exactRounding ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+0.1'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
102
103			'-1205/nm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1200 m', $noMargin ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'-1105'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
104			'-1205/wm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1200±100 m', $withMargin ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'-1105'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
105			'-1205/nr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1205±100 m', $noRounding ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'-1105'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
106			'-1205/xr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1205.00±100.00 m', $exactRounding ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'-1105'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
107			'-1205/nu' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '-1205', 'm', '-1105', '-1305' ), '-1200±100', $noUnit ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'-1105'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
108
109			'+3.025/nm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.025', '1', '+3.02744', '+3.0211' ), '3.025', $noMargin ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+3.02744'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
110			'+3.025/wm' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.025', '1', '+3.02744', '+3.0211' ), '3.025±0.004', $withMargin ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+3.02744'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
111			'+3.025/xr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.025', '1', '+3.02744', '+3.0211' ), '3.03', $exactRounding ), // TODO: never round to 0! See bug #56892
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+3.02744'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
112
113			'+3.125/nr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.125', '1', '+3.2', '+3.0' ), '3.125±0.125', $noRounding ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+3.2'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
114			'+3.125/xr' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.125', '1', '+3.2', '+3.0' ), '3.13±0.13', $exactRounding ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+3.2'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
115
116			'+3.125/fs' => array( QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+3.125', '1', '+3.2', '+3.0' ), '+3.13', $forceSign ),
			0 ignored issues – show Unused Code introduced 2016-06-23 15:23 UTC by Report Bug Copy Issue Report The call to `QuantityValue::newFromNumber()` has too many arguments starting with `'+3.2'`. This check compares calls to functions or methods with their respective definitions. If the call has more arguments than are defined, it raises an issue. If a function is defined several times with a different number of parameters, the check may pick up the wrong definition and report false positives. One codebase where this has been known to happen is Wordpress. In this case you can add the `@ignore` PhpDoc annotation to the duplicate definition and it will be ignored. Loading history...
117			);
118			}
119
120			public function testFormatWithFormatString() {
121			$formatter = $this->getQuantityFormatter( null, '<$2>$1' );
122			$value = QuantityValue::newFromNumber( '+5', 'USD' );
123			$formatted = $formatter->format( $value );
124			$this->assertSame( '<USD>5', $formatted );
125			}
126
127			}
128

DataValues / Number

Push — BoundedQuantityValue ( 1533af )

QuantityFormatterTest::getQuantityFormatter() A

Complexity

Size

Duplication

Importance

Duplication Side-by-Side

Filter issues like