Completed
Push — master ( e7435a...ed4f51 )
by Francesco
03:00
created

RepositoryResponse::setResponse()   A

Complexity

Conditions 1
Paths 1

Size

Total Lines 4
Code Lines 2

Duplication

Lines 0
Ratio 0 %

Importance

Changes 1
Bugs 0 Features 0
Metric Value
c 1
b 0
f 0
dl 0
loc 4
rs 10
cc 1
eloc 2
nc 1
nop 1
1
<?php
2
3
namespace Audiens\AppnexusClient\repository;
4
5
use GuzzleHttp\Psr7\Response;
6
7
/**
8
 * Class RepositoryResponse
9
 */
10
class RepositoryResponse
11
{
12
13
    // OK RESPONSE {"response":{"status":"OK","count":1,"start_element":0,"num_elements":100,"id":4959394,"segment":{"id":4959394,"active":true,"description":null,"member_id":3847,"code":null,"provider":"","price":0,"short_name":"Test segment4996","expire_minutes":null,"category":null,"enable_rm_piggyback":false,"last_activity":"2016-03-23 11:21:48","max_usersync_pixels":null,"parent_segment_id":null,"querystring_mapping":null,"querystring_mapping_key_value":null},"dbg":{"instance":"41.api.prod.ams1","slave_hit":false,"db":"master","user::reads":0,"user::read_limit":100,"user::read_limit_seconds":60,"user::writes":2,"user::write_limit":60,"user::write_limit_seconds":60,"reads":0,"read_limit":1073741824,"read_limit_seconds":60,"writes":2,"write_limit":1073741824,"write_limit_seconds":60,"parent_dbg_info":{"instance":"44.bm-api.prod.nym2","slave_hit":false,"db":"master","user::reads":0,"user::read_limit":100,"user::read_limit_seconds":60,"user::writes":2,"user::write_limit":60,"user::write_limit_seconds":60,"reads":0,"read_limit":1073741824,"read_limit_seconds":60,"writes":2,"write_limit":1073741824,"write_limit_seconds":60,"time":88.721990585327,"version":"1.16.497","warnings":["Field `member_id` is not available"],"slave_lag":0,"start_microtime":1458732108.3462},"time":347.10383415222,"version":"1.16.497","warnings":[],"slave_lag":0,"start_microtime":1458732108.1427}}}
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
99% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
14
    // OK DELETE "{"response":{"status":"OK","count":1,"start_element":0,"num_elements":100,"id":"4967144","dbg":{"instance":"41.api.prod.ams1","slave_hit":true,"db":"10.2.78.139","user::reads":1,"user::read_limit":100,"user::read_limit_seconds":60,"user::writes":5,"user::write_limit":60,"user::write_limit_seconds":60,"reads":1,"read_limit":1073741824,"read_limit_seconds":60,"writes":5,"write_limit":1073741824,"write_limit_seconds":60,"parent_dbg_info":{"instance":"45.bm-api.prod.nym2","slave_hit":true,"db":"10.3.81.15",
15
    // KO RESPONSE {"response":{"error_id":"SYNTAX","error":"Invalid path \/segment - member is required","error_description":null,"error_code":null,"service":"segment","method":"POST","dbg":{"instance":"40.api.prod.ams1","slave_hit":false,"db":"master","user::reads":0,"user::read_limit":100,"user::read_limit_seconds":60,"user::writes":1,"user::write_limit":60,"user::write_limit_seconds":60,"reads":0,"read_limit":1073741824,"read_limit_seconds":60,"writes":1,"write_limit":1073741824,"write_limit_seconds":60,"parent_dbg_info":{"instance":"44.bm-api.prod.nym2","slave_hit":false,"db":"master","user::reads":0,"user::read_limit":100,"user::read_limit_seconds":60,"user::writes":1,"user::write_limit":60,"user::write_limit_seconds":60,"reads":0,"read_limit":1073741824,"read_limit_seconds":60,"writes":1,"write_limit":1073741824,"write_limit_seconds":60,"time":48.772096633911,"version":"1.16.497","warnings":[],"slave_lag":0,"start_microtime":1458732144.0725},"time":278.25713157654,"version":"1.16.497","warnings":[],"slave_lag":0,"start_microtime":1458732143.8902}}}
0 ignored issues
show
Unused Code Comprehensibility introduced by
98% of this comment could be valid code. Did you maybe forget this after debugging?

Sometimes obsolete code just ends up commented out instead of removed. In this case it is better to remove the code once you have checked you do not need it.

The code might also have been commented out for debugging purposes. In this case it is vital that someone uncomments it again or your project may behave in very unexpected ways in production.

This check looks for comments that seem to be mostly valid code and reports them.

Loading history...
16
17
    const STATUS_SUCCESS = 'OK';
18
19
    /** @var bool */
20
    protected $successful = true;
21
22
    /** @var  string */
23
    protected $response;
24
25
    /**
26
     * @return mixed
27
     */
28
    public function getResponse()
29
    {
30
        return $this->response;
31
    }
32
33
    /**
34
     * @param mixed $response
35
     */
36
    public function setResponse($response)
37
    {
38
        $this->response = $response;
39
    }
40
41
    /**
42
     * @return boolean
43
     */
44
    public function isSuccessful()
45
    {
46
        return $this->successful;
47
    }
48
49
    /**
50
     * @param boolean $successful
51
     */
52
    public function setSuccessful($successful)
53
    {
54
        $this->successful = $successful;
55
    }
56
57
    /**
58
     * @param Response $response
59
     *
60
     * @return RepositoryResponse
61
     */
62
    public static function fromResponse(Response $response)
63
    {
64
        $self = new self();
65
66
        $responseBody = $response->getBody()->getContents();
67
        $response->getBody()->rewind();
68
69
        $self->setResponse($responseBody);
70
71
        $responseArray = json_decode($responseBody, true);
72
73
        if (isset ($responseArray['response']['status'])) {
74
            $self->setSuccessful($responseArray['response']['status'] == self::STATUS_SUCCESS);
75
        }
76
77
        return $self;
78
79
    }
80
81
}
82